Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lookzine Лукзин

Channel

Lookzine Лукзин

@lookziner

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,173subscribers

+168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002442941173
TypeChannel
Username@lookziner
DescriptionПодборка крутых дизайнеров для коллабораций и нетворкинга. DM @vitalyrynsky для поста, рекламы и коллаб
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lookziner

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,0056,1746,089.56 August 2026 — 6,005 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,006 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,013 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,027 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,033 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,043 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,059 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,064 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,071 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,074 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,076 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,091 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,101 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,106 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,113 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,108 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,126 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,161 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,169 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,166 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,171 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,170 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,174 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,173 subscribers6,1736 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net +168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,980–6,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 14:566,173-1
28 Oct 2026, 17:276,174+4
25 Oct 2026, 14:176,170-1
22 Oct 2026, 10:496,171+5
18 Oct 2026, 21:356,166-3
16 Oct 2026, 06:556,169+8
12 Oct 2026, 22:056,161+35
6 Oct 2026, 16:226,126+18
30 Sept 2026, 01:376,108-5
19 Sept 2026, 10:566,113+7
15 Sept 2026, 08:196,106+5
12 Sept 2026, 02:396,101+10
7 Sept 2026, 19:176,091+15
2 Sept 2026, 20:356,076+2
30 Aug 2026, 18:356,074+3
27 Aug 2026, 11:056,071+7
24 Aug 2026, 20:446,064+5
21 Aug 2026, 13:036,059+16
18 Aug 2026, 14:356,043+10
15 Aug 2026, 16:076,033first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.4%
avg views ÷ 6,173 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held43 (24 June 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total32,980
Reactions total428
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
416
Videos
12
Links
373

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3h 59m
Average length
59m 58s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,405 reactions across 39 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥71851.1%
❤46032.7%
custom 5310126401737732242674.77%
☃604.27%
💔362.56%
👀312.21%
💘271.92%
🐳60.427%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,413 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
94
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 40 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
82
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lookziner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (30.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,060 views35 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ekaterina Demeshko Lookzine page Moscow, Russia • English, Russian #Branding #GraphicDesign #DesignSystem #WebDesign #Creative ● Career — Art Director at Pixies Studio — Ex-Brand Design Lead at Pragmatica — Ex-Art Director at Cofix ● Achievements — 10+ years of experience in Branding — Work with Wildberries, VK, Yandex, hh.ru, DoDo Pizza — Gold and Silver at the Tagline Awards — Rebuilt Cofix’s visual identity fro…

❤‍🔥18❤11💘4custom 53101264017377322422

1 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,240 views56 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Обновление Lookzine — Открыл доступ к фильтру из подписки — Добавил разделы Agencies, Teams, Vacancies — Слегка обновил дизайн → lookzine.com

❤‍🔥39custom 53101264017377322429☃7💘1

31 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,380 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

November #opentowork Давно не было, но время такое, что вот. Если ищите работу — пишите о себе в посте

❤14☃6

30 Oct 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,480 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Lookzine ╳ Sasha Zagorsky Open Call 2. Recap 29 октября Выкладываю запись стрима Спасибо всем, кто был с нами на стриме, за вопросы. Отдельно кайф-кайф ребятам, чьи портфели были на разборе, — за то что были примером. Лаф лаф → Обсуждаем внутри

❤13❤‍🔥6☃4

30 Oct 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,350 views10 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @pdigestPhoto

Восьмой год я провожу исследование: какие дизайн-команды в отечественных продуктовых компаниях самые сильные? Такой рейтинг будет полезен рынку. Дизайнерам — лучше понимать, где есть хорошие вызовы и комфортная среда для профессионального роста. Компаниям и дизайн-командам — видеть, что нужно докачать. Буду благодарен, если вы пройдёте опрос. Результаты исследования опубликую в январе. Вы найдёте отчёт в крупных ди…

❤‍🔥6☃3👀1

29 Oct 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,640 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Lookzine ╳ Sasha Zagorsky Пау пау пау, сегодня в 20:00 (мск) Open call 2 Обсуждение на стыке карьерной консультации и разговора о личном опыте. Саша разберёт ситуации участников: — Дины Харитоновой — Егора Липикина — Алины Рыбальченко На каждого примерно 10-15 мин, присоединяйтесь на разбор. Ближе к 20:00 я запощу линку, в этот раз не в тг будет

❤8☃4🐳4

28 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,690 views19 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Как будет выглядеть цифровой продукт через 10 лет? → https://t.me/rdclr_home/1280

custom 53101264017377322428❤‍🔥6☃3❤1💘1

26 Oct 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,950 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Vladislav Kassin Lookzine page Tyumen, Russia • Russian, English #WebDesign #Branding #GraphicDesign #Typography #Lettering ● Career — Independent Designer — Ex-Designer at Naau ● Achievements — 5+ years of experience in multidisciplinary design — Produced the creation of clothing and accessories — Created a custom decorative Cyrillic typeface, Dipz — Received 10+ awards Behance & Dprofile ● Open to — Web-design …

❤‍🔥11❤2👀2

23 Oct 2026, 15:43 UTC≈2,040 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Открываем Open Call 2 в рамках коллаборации Lookzine и Саши Загорского 29 октября (Чт) в 20:00 по Мск пройдёт вторая трансляция: разговор с Сашей про следующий карьерный шаг. Она для тех, кто: — уже умеет, но следующий уровень пока не складывается сам собой; — чувствует, что застрял между «я уже не джун» и «я ещё не лид». Это формат на стыке карьерной консультации и разговора о личном опыте. Саша выберет 2–3 участ…

❤16☃4❤‍🔥2custom 53101264017377322422

23 Oct 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,360 views39 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Lookzine ╳ Sasha Zagorsky Open Call 1. Recap 22 октября Выкладываю запись стрима Спасибо всем, кто был с нами на стриме, и тем, кто задавал вопросы. Отдельное спасибо ребятам, чьи работы были на разборе, — за то, что не побоялись показать себя. Это был кайф! → Обсуждаем внутри

❤‍🔥26☃5❤4💘3custom 53101264017377322421

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @lookziner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Oct 2026, 06:14 UTCAnonymous Poll460 voters

На сколько ты считаешь строгий отбор в Lookzine?

  1. Нужно жёстче, нужна элита, бро21%
  2. Йеп, все хорошо, так и должно быть, всё — стиль40%
  3. Слишком строго, много высокогрейдовых и мало мидлов15%
  4. Не важен уровень, интересно узнавать новых людей24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lookzine Лукзин” (@lookziner), 6,173 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lookziner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.