Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net +159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,522–10,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 21:56
10,716
+5
6 Nov 2026, 22:46
10,711
+4
5 Nov 2026, 23:20
10,707
-4
5 Nov 2026, 01:58
10,711
+4
4 Nov 2026, 05:15
10,707
-5
3 Nov 2026, 03:07
10,712
+4
2 Nov 2026, 00:05
10,708
+4
30 Oct 2026, 19:48
10,704
+1
29 Oct 2026, 22:40
10,703
+8
29 Oct 2026, 00:28
10,695
+8
28 Oct 2026, 01:16
10,687
+12
26 Oct 2026, 21:46
10,675
+6
26 Oct 2026, 00:26
10,669
-2
24 Oct 2026, 21:21
10,671
+1
23 Oct 2026, 23:45
10,670
-6
22 Oct 2026, 23:49
10,676
+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:46
10,675
+10
20 Oct 2026, 17:05
10,665
+6
18 Oct 2026, 15:57
10,659
-1
17 Oct 2026, 15:00
10,660
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 10,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,860
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
57 (28 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
35,280
Reactions total
2,026
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,780
Videos
≈50
Links
≈558
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,749 reactions across 57 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5417861790887340169
1,855
23.9%
custom 5420299403871153783
1,825
23.6%
🔥
1,560
20.1%
🥰
761
9.82%
😁
579
7.47%
🎉
393
5.07%
😍
215
2.77%
💔
202
2.61%
👏
131
1.69%
🕊
86
1.11%
🏆
51
0.658%
😢
33
0.426%
💅
24
0.31%
🤯
17
0.219%
🤔
8
0.103%
🤬
5
0.065%
🤡
4
0.052%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,749 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.75%
1 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,990
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,310
over 56 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHgC6vd
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вчера отгремела открытая запись в Санкт-Петербурге, а впереди лайв в Москве. Но что делать, если вы живёте в другом городе, за пределами России или по каким-то другим причинам не можете попасть на наши живые выступления в столицах?
Подключайтесь на нашу следующую онлайн-трансляцию, которая пройдёт уже 26 ноября (это четверг). Мы будем вести стрим прямо с рабочей смены «Дневников Лоры Палны», и он продлится около чет…
Гайд по выживанию ⚰️
Большая часть аудитории контента о реальных преступлениях — женщины. Они воспринимают тру-крайм как своеобразный инструктаж. Девушки изучают логику и поведение преступников, чтобы в будущем знать, как себя защитить.
Мы наткнулись на тред*, где женщины рассказывали о правилах, которые они выработали для себя благодаря потреблению криминальных историй. Делимся полезными советами в карточках. И жд…
Уже традиционно — про входы и выходы. Их в «Космонавте» два:
🔴 слева для VIP-зоны (второго этажа);
🔴 справа для партера.
На первом входе выдают специальные браслетики, которые позволяют тусоваться на VIP-местах. Поэтому если вы приобрели билет в эту зону, то лучше зайти через него.
Двигайтесь по указателям на улице — точно не заблудитесь 🖤
Где купить мерч «Дневников»?
На открытых записях подкаста 😄
Да, ещё один повод прийти на лайвы — это затариться штучками-дрючками, которые наша команда создаёт для вас. В карточках показываем ништяки, которые вы найдёте на грядущих выступлениях.
Мы встречаемся в Санкт-Петербурге уже сегодня — ждём вас в клубе «Космонавт» в 19:00. Сначала Маша и Митя расскажут парочку криминальных историй, а потом ответят на ваши в…
Среда праздничная, настроение рабочее! Ведь уже завтра мы встречаемся с питерскими лорапалнерами (билеты все еще есть и их все еще можно брать)
И пусть #ахахаихихи будет немножко в тему!
P.S. в комментах делимся, у кого на завтра прям хорошее предчувствие!)
😍44🔥19custom 542029940387115378319
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @lorapalnapodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
У Холмов Есть Подкаст @uholmov · 25,558 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов @zakat_podcast · 31,385 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневники Лоры Палны” (@lorapalnapodcast), 10,716 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorapalnapodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
