Channel
@lotus_writer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
584subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002507049763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lotus_writer |
| Created | Between 1 February 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lotus_writer |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 584 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 583 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 584 | +9 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 02:15 | 575 | -1 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 576 | +16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 560 | +10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:23 | 550 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 550 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 553 | +15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 538 | +11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 527 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 514 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 513 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
از همون ساعتی که خوابم برد و بیدار شدم، تا همین حالا هزاران گندکاری کردم! می‌تونم اعتراف کنم که امروز به هرچی دست زدم، نابود شد. غذا درست کردم، سوخت! قهوه خوردم، لیوان توی دستم شکست! خواستم گلدون قدیمی رو گردگیری کنم، از دستم افتاد و هزار تیکه شد. خواستم چای بریزم، آب‌جوش روی دستم ریخت. پنجره باز کردم، باد اومد و گلدون رو انداخت و سانسوریا دورطلایی‌م افتاد و شکست. گلی که سه سال براش زحمت کشیدم تا بزرگ شه و بچه‌دار شه…
Signed ئافڕت
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ئافڕت
Him and I 🎸
Signed ئافڕت
«غیر از کتاب چی؟ بگو دیگر چی می‌خواهی؟» «جز کتاب؟» ساکت ماند، به سه‌کنج دیوار خیره شد: «خودت. خودت و حضورت.» «تا به حال کجا بودی؟ نورسا.» و نتوانست جلو گریه‌اش را بگیرد: «من خوشبختی نمی‌خواهم، فقط تو را می‌خواهم...» — نام تمام مردگان یحیی‌ست، عباس معروفی
Signed ئافڕت
File, posted without a caption
Signed ئافڕت
File, posted without a caption
Signed ئافڕت
File, posted without a caption
Signed ئافڕت
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed ئافڕت
تو روانشناسی یه مفهومی هست به اسم #تداوم‌پیوند. یعنی مرگِ یک آدم به معنی تمام شدن رابطه با اون آدم نیست. رابطه از شکل بیرونی و دوطرفه‌ش خارج می‌شه، اما می‌تونه به شکل خاطره، دلبستگی، ارزش، عادت و اثری که اون آدم روی هویت و نگاه ما گذاشته، در زندگی‌مون ادامه پیدا کنه. و شاید بخش سختِ ماجرا هم همین باشه. آدم باید با نبودنِ واقعیِ یک نفر کنار بیاد، در حالی که بازنماییِ ذهنی و عاطفیِ اون آدم هنوز کاملاً زنده‌ست.. یعنی …
Signed ئافڕت
بعد از تموم کردن کتاب ربکا، کتاب "نام تمام مردگان یحی‌ست" رو توی سال‌روز درگذشتِ عباس معروفی شروع کردم. این کتاب، بیش از این‌که در رابطه با مرگ باشه، در رابطه با آدم‌هاییِ که بعد از رفتن‌شون هنوز توی زندگی انسان‌ها، ادامه پیدا میکنن و بودن‌شون جریان داره.
Signed ئافڕت
هیچکس نحوست و نکبت را از یاد نبرد. سال بلوا|عباس معروفی
https://open.spotify.com/show/4wPPAqnBUZhFpQotCilNSm?si=bPlMWIlvR42eUba5hilu3A&utm_source=native-share-menu
Signed ئافڕت
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lotus_writer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐀𝐅𝐑𝐀𝐓🪷” (@lotus_writer), 584 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lotus_writer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.