#网友投稿 #恋爱陷阱 发这篇笔记没有别的目的,就是希望把我的真实经历发出来,让大家看清一些网络交友的套路,千万不要再有下一个受害者了。 我和这位女网友一开始聊天非常投缘,对方表现得温柔大方,甚至让我觉得遇到了对的人。 但随后,对方就开始以各种理由和借口向我索取钱,现在这个人还在亚太,可能去会所了,钱也没多少才2千U,对我这样的有钱人来说只沧海一粟,只是想着被骗心里不舒服,有什么困难直接跟我说就好了,我不是那种差事的人! PS:在一声声哥哥中,迷失了自己😂 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun

Channel
海外国际曝光社
@love3r
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33,807subscribers
+18,218 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002207897322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @bh96666 @love3r |
| Description | 全网发布最新曝光频道 #缅甸 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #迪拜 #东南亚 #老挝 #阿富汗 #阿联酋 #马来西亚 本频道只负责曝光 真假自行甄别 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 ☎️吃瓜群众聯盟: @chigua6664 #东南亚 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #交流群 #曝料 #吃瓜 #大事件曝光 #头条 #热点 #资讯 #新闻 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/love3r |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 33,807 | -4 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 33,811 | -1,240 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 35,051 | -9 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 35,060 | -491 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 35,551 | -78 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 35,629 | -435 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 36,064 | -28 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 36,092 | -222 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 36,314 | -121 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 36,435 | -268 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 36,703 | -113 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 36,816 | -500 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 37,316 | +1,234 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 36,082 | +23,691 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 12,391 | -149 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 12,540 | -385 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 12,925 | -134 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 13,059 | -260 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 13,319 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 13,332 | first reading |
Engagement
252 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.679%
- avg views ÷ 33,807 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 230
- 125 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.392%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 125
- of 252 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 125 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 252 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,704 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,500
- Videos
- ≈2,320
- Links
- ≈1,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 51m 27s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 71 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 53 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 54.7% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 252 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友投稿 假借广告名义实施盗U诈骗的骗子实在可恨!这类骗子手段狡诈,得手后就会更换账号名字继续四处行骗,千万不要抱有侥幸心理,说不定下一个被骗的就是你。 2026年09月23日,在此提醒所有网友警惕假借广告名义盗U的诈骗团伙。这类骗子利用广告合作作为幌子实施盗窃,一旦落入圈套,资产就会遭受损失,实在让人深恶痛绝。 骗子十分狡猾,在作案之后,会迅速更改账号昵称,换一副伪装继续在各个平台寻找目标,不断物色新的受害者。很多人以为自己不会中招,可骗子的套路层出不穷,稍不留意就会踩坑,下一个受害的很可能就是你。 请广大网友提高防范意识,凡是涉及资产转账、授权操作的一定要再三核实,不要轻易相信陌生广告邀约,守住自己的财产安全,谨防上当受骗。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
柬埔寨新钞上线!5万、10万瑞尔长这样 柬埔寨央行正式发行新版5万和10万瑞尔纸币,由首相洪玛奈批准,新旧版并行流通。 新版10万瑞尔:绿灰主调,国母亮相 依据2026年9月25日第206号次级法令发行。尺寸170×75毫米,主色绿灰。正面印有西哈努克太皇与莫尼列王太后肖像、国徽及九头蛇神图案。多处标有“100000”字样,下边缘印有“伪造纸币者将依法受到惩罚”警示语,并含行长签名。 新版5万瑞尔:棕褐色调,设安全线 同依上述法令发行。尺寸155×72毫米,主色棕褐。正面为西哈努克太皇肖像,配有胜利剑杯、七头蛇神图案及“50000”标识。亮点是贯穿上下的1.2毫米宽安全线,防伪升级。&& 两种新钞均具备多重防伪特征,旧钞继续有效,不影响日常交易。在柬同胞收到大额现金时,不妨对照检查新版特征,安心使用。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@r…
🔥2❤1
#群友吐槽:有的人连饭都吃不上,有的人却连吃饭都不肯赏个脸,我知道这个世界就是这么讽刺 本人在曼谷生活了几年,眼看到中秋节了想约两个在飞机上认识一年多的伙伴吃饭,我是自己做饭,其中一个见过一面, 另一个事先说好了最后又爽约,结果都婉拒,没别的意思,就想吐槽下现在的人文关系都这么浅薄的吗,其实大家即使不明说也能明白无只有一个原因,怕我给你下毒还是怕我给你绑了? 现在这大环境的风评是不好,人身安全是第一位,谨慎小心是没错,但过于谨慎小心错过的就不只是一顿饭了。 希望大家还是少点猜忌吧,出门在外保障自身安全的同时也尽量别给他人泼冷水,着实有点寒心,最后祝大家中秋快乐~~ 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
西港凌晨发生中国籍人员疑似绑架未遂 9月25日凌晨2时40分左右,西哈努克省第4分区(4号分区)靠近“Tajeer Ler”现代市场一带发生一起疑似绑架事件。 据当地消息,一名中国籍男子驾驶一辆黑色丰田 Hilander,试图将另一名中国籍人员强行拉上车,但在实施过程中,被现场柬埔寨民众及时发现并出手干预,最终未能得逞。 事件发生后,引起附近居民及沿街群众的高度关注,现场一度出现骚动。目前,事件具体经过以及涉事人员身份、动机等情况,仍有待进一步调查核实。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
Bitget热钱包突发安全事件,涉及约3.516亿美元 9月25日凌晨2:31,Bitget监测到部分热钱包及温钱包发生异常转账,初步涉及约3.516亿美元。平台表示,冷钱包未受影响,用户账户余额准确,相关损失由规模超过4.64亿美元的用户保护基金覆盖。 目前充币和交易功能正常,提币功能暂时关闭。异常地址已被标记,执法部门及链上安全机构已介入调查。 Bitget将在24小时内公布完整报告,包括事件原因及整改措施。 PS:保护基金确实能兜底,但3.5亿美元不是小数目。现在大家最关心的,还是提币什么时候恢复。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
❤1
一晃,来到东南亚,已经是第四个中秋。 回首这四年漂泊的日子,说不尽的辛酸与浮沉。 当初背上行囊远赴他乡,怀揣着一丝期许奔赴这里,可现实远比想象难熬。在陌生的国度,语言隔阂,人情复杂,无数个难熬的深夜,只能一个人默默扛下所有压力。 有过满怀希望的时候,也经历过跌落低谷的时刻;有过奔波劳碌的日夜,也体会过孤立无援的无助。见过这里喧嚣热闹的市井烟火,也领教过异乡现实的冰冷。多少委屈只能自己消化,多少迷茫只能独自熬过,一路走来,跌跌撞撞,冷暖全部都藏在心底,无人诉说。 日子日复一日在漂泊里向前,以为慢慢会习惯异乡的生活,可每到月圆佳节,心底的思乡就会翻涌得难以抑制。 这边的月亮同样皎洁圆满,夜空也一样明朗,可这里的热闹,终究不属于我。万家灯火璀璨,却没有一盏灯是为我守候。 隔着千山万水,没办法回到家里,不能陪父母围坐一桌吃团圆饭,不能和亲人一起分食月饼,不能听听家里的家长里短。每逢佳节,心里满是愧疚,亏欠家人太多陪伴。 身…
❤1👍1
#群友投稿:能接得住的,才是自己的 如果我的能力,只能让我在东南亚穷困潦倒,那穷困潦倒也是我现阶段的价值。出来混了这么久,见过太多人一夜暴富,也见过太多人一夜之间什么都没了。以前总觉得,只要有人愿意带我,只要有人给我机会,只要有人告诉我怎么赚钱,我就能翻身。 后来才明白,别人给你的东西,你没能力接住,给了也是白给;别人告诉你的道理,你自己没经历过、没悟到,听完也只是一阵热血,你没有那个认知,就算今天有人把路铺到你脚下,你还是会走回原来的路。 真正属于你的东西,不是别人给你的,而是你自己经历过、摔过、疼过,最后一点一点悟出来的。东南亚这几年,U赚过,坑踩过,夜路走过,也见过有人从天堂掉到地下。 现在才知道,所谓上岸,不是赚到多少钱,而是终于明白自己为什么一直上不了岸。只有自己觉到、悟到,才有可能做到。能做到的,才真正是你的。 大彻大悟不是突然想通了,而是有一天,你终于不再幻想靠别人改变自己的命运。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社…
金边奥林匹亚公寓端掉电诈窝点 9月23日,金边玛卡拉区执法人员突查奥林匹亚公寓及商业楼17层一处房间,抓获7名涉嫌从事网络诈骗的越南人,其中1名女性,7人均无法出示护照。 现场查获2台笔记本电脑、12部手机、2.87万美元现金、一辆奔驰汽车,以及一包疑似毒品和吸食工具等物品。涉事房间已被查封,7人移交金边警方调查。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
#马来西亚资讯:警方捣毁吉隆坡两豪华公寓诈骗团伙 逮捕24人 马来西亚吉隆坡警方近日展开两次突击行动,捣毁两个分别针对中国和日本受害者的网络诈骗团伙,并逮捕24人,其中包括23名外国公民。 当旺宜警区警方于9月18日和19日,先后突击搜查位于吉隆坡城中城(KLCC)一带罗弄宾杰(Lorong Binjai)及Persiaran KLCC的豪华公寓单位,逮捕4名女性和20名男性。 当旺宜警区主任苏利兹梅·阿芬迪·苏莱曼助理警监表示,警方于9月18日接获网络诈骗活动举报后,突击搜查罗弄宾杰的两间豪华公寓单位,并逮捕13名外国公民及1名本地公民。 他说,落网者年龄介于18岁至45岁之间,相信是持社交访问准证入境马来西亚,随后租用豪华公寓作为诈骗团伙的呼叫中心。 “警方检查现场发现的电子设备后,证实有关单位涉及网络诈骗活动,并通过虚假平台锁定中国受害者。” 警方在行动中起获数台笔记本电脑、手机、调制解调器、路由器及门禁卡等物…
👍1
#网友投稿:爱在酒店发小卡片的朋友们,最近就别偷偷往我房门塞了 现在大环境不好,没班上,也没钱去消费。 卡片我收到了,心意我也懂了,但人是真的去不了啊,等我哪天重新上班赚到钱了,再来光顾你们。 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
🔥1
#网友投稿:今天上午,南海客房让联合执法一个个房间查,没护照,都不行,很多人走了出来。老子睡着觉给酒店经理敲醒了~~反诈大会还在开,查房依然不能停,西港不给人生存了吗? 🔔 订阅东南亚曝光社频道 ↓ 🔗@BH96666 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料: @gushi981 📊精彩爆料聊天室:@rihantaijiaoliuqun
Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @love3r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“海外国际曝光社” (@love3r), 33,807 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/love3r.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.