Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Любовь и Боль

Channel

Любовь и Боль

@love_kartinki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,028subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299742313
TypeChannel
Username@love_kartinki
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/love_kartinki

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0281,0511,039.56 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,050 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,042 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,035 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,034 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,030 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,028 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,025–1,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:161,028-2
12 Sept 2026, 23:161,030-4
9 Sept 2026, 02:181,034-1
4 Sept 2026, 03:381,035-4
31 Aug 2026, 19:561,039-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:151,041-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:321,042-1
19 Aug 2026, 02:341,043-5
15 Aug 2026, 15:461,048-1
12 Aug 2026, 00:421,049-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:311,050-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:011,051no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:521,051first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 25 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

696 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27239.1%
❤24535.2%
🤮598.48%
🔥284.02%
👎233.30%
👏172.44%
😁131.87%
🥰131.87%
❤‍🔥71.01%
😭50.718%
🤔50.718%
🍌40.575%
😢30.431%
💋10.144%
💯10.144%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 696 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2022 to 9 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2022, 21:20 UTC≈51,400 views318 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍132❤76🤮42🔥23👏13🥰8😁7👎5

3 Mar 2022, 22:22 UTC≈41,300 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤32👍4

3 Mar 2022, 22:22 UTC≈37,800 views82 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖤 @Love_Kartinki 🖤

👍37❤23🤮11😁6👏4💯1

3 Mar 2022, 22:22 UTC≈39,300 views84 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖤 @Love_Kartinki 🖤

❤37👍33👎5🤮5❤‍🔥3💋1

3 Mar 2022, 22:22 UTC≈39,500 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤17👍12🥰3

2 Mar 2022, 19:15 UTC≈35,000 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍31❤21👎13

25 Feb 2022, 08:23 UTC≈31,400 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍23❤21🔥5😭5❤‍🔥4🥰2🤮1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @love_kartinki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сытый Муж 🍽️Рецепты 🥗Салаты 🍢Закуски 🥨Выпечка
@sitiy_muzh · 62,325
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 August 2026
Психология саморазвитие
@Psihologiya_samorazvitie · 50,358
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Любовь и Боль” (@love_kartinki), 1,028 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/love_kartinki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.