Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أحببتكِ

Channel

أحببتكِ

@love_moona

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,855subscribers

-360 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001162716576
TypeChannel
Username@love_moona
Descriptionاحبكِ جدا واعرف اني اعيش بمنفى وانتِ بمنفى وبيني وبينكِ ريح وغيم وبرق ورعد وثلج ونار "للتبادلات" @H13_M_bot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/love_moona

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8557,2157,0357 August 2026 — 7,215 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,215 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,209 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,200 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,189 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,169 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,156 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,139 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,141 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,130 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,116 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,091 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,081 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,070 subscribers1 October 2026 — 7,012 subscribers8 October 2026 — 6,989 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,971 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,949 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,932 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,919 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,910 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,887 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,876 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,855 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net -360. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,801–7,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:266,855-21
2 Nov 2026, 14:096,876-11
30 Oct 2026, 11:146,887-23
27 Oct 2026, 00:286,910-9
23 Oct 2026, 23:466,919-13
20 Oct 2026, 18:476,932-17
17 Oct 2026, 09:046,949-22
13 Oct 2026, 22:596,971-18
8 Oct 2026, 16:016,989-23
1 Oct 2026, 22:567,012-58
16 Sept 2026, 21:017,070-11
12 Sept 2026, 20:367,081-10
8 Sept 2026, 17:387,091-25
3 Sept 2026, 21:157,116-14
31 Aug 2026, 12:177,130-11
28 Aug 2026, 13:537,141+2
25 Aug 2026, 19:597,139-17
22 Aug 2026, 22:177,156-13
19 Aug 2026, 14:577,169-20
16 Aug 2026, 09:067,189first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 6,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
785
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held45 (19 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total10,989
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,240
Videos
≈1,020
Links
≈654

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC200 viewsread 6 November 2026

آهٍ من شعركِ الطويل! من شدّة جماله أتمنّى لو كان الأمر بيدي لوكّلت عليه حرسًا من الملائكةيحرسونه من كلّ عينٍ قد تحسده،وأوّلها عيني أنا..فأنا أكثر العيون أفتتانًا به وأخشى عليه من شدّة ما أُطيل النظر إليه.

3 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC205 viewsread 6 November 2026

أتنفّس..فتدخل رائحتها إلى صدري فيضيق كلّ شيء.. وكأنني أتنفّس من قصبةٍ ضيّقة ثم تعيدني رائحتها إلى النقطة ذاتها التي ظننت أنّني غادرتها.

3 Nov 2026, 12:44 UTC206 viewsread 6 November 2026

كلُّ نفسٍ ذائقةُ الحبّ، أنا وقلبي لعينيك، ونحن إليها راجعون. فما للهوى مرجعٌ، إلّا إلى الذي خلق الهوى.

27 Oct 2026, 06:44 UTC655 viewsread 6 November 2026

قلنا لكم لاتنزلوش تعز فيها وحوش...لكنكم هفل ماتسمعوش 😂😂😂😂

13 Oct 2026, 21:35 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 6 November 2026

«كنت سأخطو إليك مسافة العالم لو اني شعرت بحزنك على حزني حقًا، لكنك غير مكترث، كما لو أن قلبك كامل من دوني»

Signed ♡ 𝓕 ♡

13 Oct 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 6 November 2026

أنا لستُ وحدي، غيرَ أنّي وحيدُ تحيطُ بيَ الوجوهُ ولا أرى أحدَا أحادثُ صمتي كلَّ ليلةِ موحشًا وأدفنُ في صدري الكلامَ أذا بدا ‌ أقولُ‌: أنا بخيرٍ، ويعرفُ داخلي بأنّي أخفي خلفَ صوتي ألفَ نحيبْ تعبتُ من التظاهرِ بالقوةِ أمامهم وأرهقني أن أبتسم كي لا أُسألْ ‌ فهل يُشفى الفؤادُ إذا تعوّدَ أن يعيشَ الألم‌ حتى يصيرَ عاديًا؟.

Signed ♡ 𝓕 ♡

13 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 6 November 2026

- إنّ علامَاتِي هذا العام مُمتازة، شَعري طَال، والهالاتُ تحتَ عينيّ بدأت تتلاشى. لكنّني فقدتُ وَزنِي مُجددًا. إنّها أحادِيثي السخيفةُ كالمُعتاد، لكن لا أجِد أَحدًا أتذمرُ إليه، ويستمعُ لي بالساعات. إنّي أخشى ثقلي عليهم يَ أُبي، وَحدَكَ كُنت أُحِبُ أن أتحدثَ إليك دائمًا، مِزاجيةٌ كمَا تَقول وَلكن، حِدّة مزاجي وعقدة حاجِبّي فور رُؤيتك، تَغدو ابتسامةً شاسعة. مَازلتُ كعادتي؛ حين أعودُ للمنزل، أتفقدُ حِذائك أمَام الباب، أ…

Signed ♡ 𝓕 ♡

10 Oct 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 6 November 2026

تَعال لأغرقك في عيني .. لولا أنك استسلمت لنعاسكَ، لأخبرتكَ بِحُبي لكَ ، وأني قد أصبتُ بكَ من جانبي الأيسر، وأنكَ في عيني وقلبي، وأني أحملكَ في روحي وقد اشتقتُ إليكَ حدَ التلف ولستَ ترضى بتلفي بالتأكيد، ليكن رأسكَ على صدري، سأتنفسُ بشكل صحيح حينها، تَعالَ لأقبلك من عينك، فحسابُ شوقي يتراكمُ ديناً عليكَ .. سأعاقبكَ على نومك قبلَ أنتهاء كلامي أنت تعلم هذا.

Signed ♡ 𝓕 ♡

9 Oct 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 6 November 2026

إنَّ اللهَ ومَلائِكتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ على النَّبِيِّ يَا أيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا» "اللهم صلِّ وسلّم على سيدنا محمد."

Signed ♡ 𝓕 ♡

8 Oct 2026, 22:02 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 6 November 2026

أيُقارنُ الكَون بِصَنعاءَ إِذا سكبَ اللَّيلُ كُحلَهُ علَى جِبالِها.؟❣

Signed ♡ 𝓕 ♡

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @love_moona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

- اقتباسات حزينه 🖤 .
@zxxar · 83,803
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 17 August 2026
الصورة تقول
@iiiii9 · 66,812
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أحببتكِ” (@love_moona), 6,855 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/love_moona.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.