Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ִֶָ ˖࣪ ָ࣪ ۰ᨳ ꪑꪖɾꪜιꫀꪀ ♡

Channel

ִֶָ ˖࣪ ָ࣪ ۰ᨳ ꪑꪖɾꪜιꫀꪀ ♡

@lovechocolatthe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725534236
TypeChannel
Username@lovechocolatthe
Created19 June 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/lovechocolatthe

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 June 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2022 to 9 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2022, 14:57 UTC212 viewsread 28 August 2026

🐱 this secret message for ო⍺rꪜіᥱᥒ 👤 #𝓢𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐚 semangat terus yaa 👤 #athv. kalau kamu sedih jangan pernah berpikir untuk nyerah ya, always be happy and don't forget to smile 👤 #Hæn be happy cutie, aosjeh km gemes yaa hahaha 👤 ⍕. hei 👤 Kosong ya? Masuk boleh lah wkwk 👤 #𝐆𝐒𝐀. be strong whatever the situation 😉🤜🏻 👤 🐭 semangatt terus dan bahagia selalu yaaa 👤 tetap semangat dan jangan pernah lupa untuk bersyukur 👤

19 Jun 2022, 14:57 UTC220 viewsread 28 August 2026

this first impression for @wittlekim from baby baby 💗 👤 #𝓢𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐚 LUCUU BANGET?? 👤 #a$. damn.. so cute 👤 friendly + humble 👤 Cute 👤 lucuuu 👤 𝄞. cute and friendly 👤 lucu, humble and kind 👤 #ZM lucu & jamet. 👤 #MARV cute and very kind 👤 #𝐕𝕵. seems humble n adorable 👤 •MK lucuuu, maniss, and friendly 👤 #ELVN cutee boy💕 👤 #Kale : cute, like a baby. 👤 #lokā. Cutie 👤 #RZ gemas 👤 #𝐆𝐒𝐀. KAMU GEMES BANGETT 👤 🐨

19 Jun 2022, 14:54 UTC236 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤh⍺ᥣᥣ𝘰uuu ๑>◡<๑ , i want to introduce — mуsᥱᥣ𝖿 ᥲ ᥣі𝗍𝗍ᥣᥱ っ ‌ -⸝⸝˘♡ , ᑲᥱ𝖿᥆rᥱ mу ᥒᥲmᥱ іs mᥲrvіᥱᥒ , ძ᥆ у᥆ᥙ kᥒ᥆ᥕ? і𝖿 ᥒ᥆𝗍 , ᥴ᥆mᥱ ᥆ᥒ , gᥱ𝗍 𝗍᥆ kᥒ᥆ᥕ mᥱ , і rᥱᥲᥣᥣ𝘺 ᥣіkᥱ ᥕᥲrო hᥙցs , i also rᥱᥲᥣᥣу ᥣіkᥱ і𝗍 ᥕһᥱᥒ mу һᥱᥲძ іs ⍴ᥲ𝗍 – ⍴ᥲ𝗍 ᥣіkᥱ ᥲ kі𝗍𝗍у ฅ^._.^ฅ🐱 , would у᥆ᥙ gі᥎ᥱ mᥱ ᥲᥣᥣ 𝗍һᥲ𝗍? һᥱһᥱһᥱ ૮₍ ๑•᎑<๑ ₎ა i will be very happ – іᥱ !! 。 ᥲᥒძ у᥆ᥙ kᥒ᥆ᥕ? і rᥱᥲᥣᥣу ᥣ𝘰vᥱᥱ𝘴 mᥲ𝗍ᥴһᥲ ᥆һ —

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lovechocolatthe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“ִֶָ ˖࣪ ָ࣪ ۰ᨳ ꪑꪖɾꪜιꫀꪀ ♡” (@lovechocolatthe). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovechocolatthe.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.