Photo, posted without a caption
π53β€39π€©14π₯°6π3
Signed .β’β«β’β¬β’π₯π€β’β¬β’β«β’.

Channel
@loveispurple1
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
11,803subscribers
-352 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001374048752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loveispurple1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 7 August 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loveispurple1 |
Ecommerce storefront β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 11,803 | -35 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 11,838 | -15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 11,853 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 11,865 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 11,875 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 11,881 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 11,896 | -20 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 11,916 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 11,929 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:24 | 11,935 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:14 | 11,946 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 11,959 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 11,966 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 11,975 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 11,982 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 11,989 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 11,995 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 12,003 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:20 | 12,016 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 12,030 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2021 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
239 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 145 | 60.7% | |
| β€ | 70 | 29.3% | |
| π€© | 14 | 5.86% | |
| π₯° | 6 | 2.51% | |
| π | 3 | 1.26% | |
| π | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2021 to 5 January 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
π53β€39π€©14π₯°6π3
Signed .β’β«β’β¬β’π₯π€β’β¬β’β«β’.
Quite β yet so loud..... @loveispurple π
π19β€8
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
Hello, if you guys want to order anything : electronics, clothes, cosmetics .... anything you need please make sure to contact us @whisperz @Edlawit345 Thank you so much
π5β€4
Signed NebAbdi
@loveispurpleπ
π7β€4
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
My dad told me, "You shouldn't have to threaten to leave in order to receive the love you need"and wow. @loveispurple
π6
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
You cant give up some one coz situations not deal. Great relationships aren't great coz they have no problems .they are great because both ppl care enough about the other person to find a way to make it work @loveispurple
π5β€3
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
@loveispurpleπ
β€4π1
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
Dogs will always love you more than Rose loved Jack. @loveispurple
π5
Signed NebAbdi
@loveispurple
π8β€3π1
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
Imagine if message had a memories too "1 year ago today: i wont leave You baby"π @crazy_thoughtsss
π3
Signed οΈΨ±Ψ§ΩΩΨ§π₯
https://t.me/joinchat/oIkjM_wSERJhNzg8 Join
Signed .β’β«β’β¬β’π₯π€β’β¬β’β«β’.
Sunset π
π14
Signed .β’β«β’β¬β’π₯π€β’β¬β’β«β’.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @loveispurple1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@loveispurple1 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βLove πβ (@loveispurple1), 11,803 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loveispurple1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.