Channel
@loversfaith
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
6,075subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001065970527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loversfaith |
| Created | 4 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loversfaith |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 6,075 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 6,072 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 6,066 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:34 | 6,082 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 6,079 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 6,073 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 6,084 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 6,079 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 6,075 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 6,078 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 6,076 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 6,076 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 27 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🔅علم در ساحت قیامت به مثابه ی اوصاف.. ×اتحاد وصف و واصف و موصوف ×علم و جهل در احادیث همان صفات خوب و بد است ×علم در احادیث از سنخ مفهوم[ ِ ذهنی و عقلی] نیست از سنخِ وصف و صفتِ درونی ست #ماه_رمضان_سال_١٣٥٤ 🕰 ۷ دقیقه #اصالت_صفت 🔸برشی از گفتارهای #مرحوم_سید_مرتضی_جزایری @loversfaith
ادامه👆 ۲۱ـ فرزند حاصل از ازدواج دو اسیر نیز بنده شناخته شده، و در اختیار مالک آن زن و شوهر است. ۲۲ـ مالک زن و شوهر اسیر میتواند هر وقت خواسته آنها را از هم و از فرزندانشان جدا کند. ۲۳ـ قاضی نه بر اساس علم و یقین خود بلکه فقط بر اساس شهادت باید حکم کند. ۲۴ـ شهادت جز در موارد حسّی قابل قبول نیست. ۲۵ـ قضاوت یک دفعه است، و با حکم قاضی نتیجه حکم هر چه باشد اجرا میشود. ۲۶ـ کیفر دزدی بریدن دست است. ۲۷ـ کیفر شرابخواری در …
ادامه👆 شب تاریک و بیم موج و گردابی چنین هائل کجا دانند حال ما سبکباران ساحلها تازه پس از خارج شدن از دریائی از این افسانهها که کاری آسان نیست، و هر کسی توان چنین آزاداندیشی را نداشته و ندارد ولی فرضاً که قدرت چنین پرشی بود، هنوز موانع دیگری چون سدّ سکندر بر سر راه میباشد، و تا آن موانع برداشته نشود دسترسی بدان چشمهٔ حیات امکانپذیر نیست، و در صدر این موانع نارسائی قرار دادههای دینی است (احکام شرع: از واجب، حرا…
بنام خدا نامهای به دوست ✍ #سید_مرتضی_جزایری هنوز به یاد ندارم کاری را که قصد انجامش را کردهام دیگری کرده باشد، و از کسی هم چنین چیزی نشنیدهام. نامههای ادبی و فلسفی و عرفانی بسیاری در سطح خیلی بالا فراوان دیده و شنیدهام، و حتی تعدادی از آنها را تاریخ و منشورات ادبی ضبط و نقل کردهاند، ولی هیچیک از آنها تأمین مقصود من را نمیکنند. قصد من تعریفی است از دین؛ در سطحی از یک ذهنیت عالمانه، در حقیقت میخواهم از لاب…
@loversfaith
🔹تقابلِ اضداد در کربلا... سال ۱۳۷۴ #کربلا #عاشورا #امام_حسین 🔸بخشی از گفتار مرحوم سید مرتضی جزایری @loversfaith
https://t.me/SeyedmortezajazayeriQuran
تقریر ۵ جلسه ابتدایی محرم ۱۴۱۶ قمری بیانات مرحوم سید مرتضی جزایری #محرم #متن #سید_مرتضی_جزایری @loversfaith
حب الحسین علیه السلام @loversfaith
▪️غربت و مظلومیت سیدالشهدا ع بخشی از گفتار #سید_مرتضی_جزایری ✔️محرم ۱۴۲۰ @loversfaith
▪️روایت اخلاقی و تربیتی حادثه عاشورا بخشی از گفتار #سید_مرتضی_جزایری ✔️محرم ۱۴۲۱ @loversfaith
.......🔸🔸🔸
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @loversfaith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@loversfaith edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال رسمی سید مرتضی جزایری” (@loversfaith), 6,075 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loversfaith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.