Channel
@ls_zabito
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,541subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002070894561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ls_zabito |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ls_zabito |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 1,541 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 1,546 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 1,549 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 1,553 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 1,555 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,558 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 1,557 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 1,559 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 1,560 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 1,556 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 1,556 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 34.7% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 30.7% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 22.7% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😼 Конечно я не пропущу выход Seedance 2.5 🔥😅 Но на старте скажу: с русским всё ещё печаль, стало ДОРОЖЕ (из-за этого заметно меньше тестов на первых порах, чем обычно) и беда с доступом (сейчас можно погонять на Dreamina, который я так и не победил с разными впн), но скоро он разойдется по агрегаторам (наценку страшно представить 😂). А ещё ложка дегтя: судя по работам, Seedance 2 порой выигрывает звуком и атмосферо…
🔥5👍4
🔥 Fish.audio выпустили обновленную модель S2.1 PRO, которая создаёт аудио из текста. Важно, что потестировать можно бесплатно у них на сайте. Можно даже клонировать голос бесплатно, но всего до 90 секунд. И когда вы нажмете на кнопку "Генерировать речь" не пугайтесь, если вылезет окошко с тарифами, просто закройте его и нажмите еще раз на кнопку. Видимо эту модель они не планируют уже выпускать в опенсорс, т.к. соб…
😁6👍3🔥3
Привет, дорогой читатель 👋 Введу на всякий случай в курс дела, почему канал «умер» и больше месяца посты не выходят. Я неоднократно говорил, что не хочу писать тогда, когда не выходит ничего интересного) И, по моему стойкому мнению, из интересного за последние 1,5 месяца не было НИ-ЧЕ-ГО, что можно было бы осветить или поделиться каким-то видеоуроком. Даже больше скажу - стало ХУЖЕ, но на мой, опять же, субъективн…
👏17👍12🔥10🙏2😁1
🔥 Что-то я совсем заработался, погнали по мини-новостям: 1️⃣ Unity выпустили "ИИ-вайбкодинг агента" для создания игр. Есть бесплатное демо, но нужна зарубежная карта. А так, всё к этому и шло, но 100% это работает сейчас очень криво. А ещё есть доступ за 10$/месяц. Если кто-то тестил, будет интересно почитать/посмотреть игру 🕹 🔗 Ссылка для теста. 2️⃣ Canva обновилась до AI Version 2 (ещё 23 апреля). Подробнее чита…
🔥8👍4
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ls_zabito. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Личка забита ✉️” (@ls_zabito), 1,541 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ls_zabito.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.