Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Людмила Личи

Channel

Людмила Личи

@ludmilalichy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,181subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001618693496
TypeChannel
Username@ludmilalichy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ludmilalichy

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,14615,18315,164.57 August 2026 — 15,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,157 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,155 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,148 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,146 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,149 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,157 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,158 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,150 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,159 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,164 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,169 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,170 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,172 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,171 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,166 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,167 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,176 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,180 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,175 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,176 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,183 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,178 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,169 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,174 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,179 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,177 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,181 subscribers15,1817 August 202619 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,140–15,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:4015,181+4
14 Sept 2026, 20:1715,177-2
13 Sept 2026, 03:2115,179+5
11 Sept 2026, 07:1815,174+5
8 Sept 2026, 09:3815,169-9
5 Sept 2026, 07:3915,178-5
3 Sept 2026, 14:4015,183+7
2 Sept 2026, 04:4315,176+1
1 Sept 2026, 07:2715,175-5
31 Aug 2026, 04:5315,180+4
30 Aug 2026, 06:2715,176+9
29 Aug 2026, 06:0415,167+1
28 Aug 2026, 09:0715,166-5
27 Aug 2026, 07:2315,171-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:2715,172+2
25 Aug 2026, 04:0415,170+1
23 Aug 2026, 22:3415,169+5
20 Aug 2026, 19:0515,164+5
19 Aug 2026, 21:1815,159+9
18 Aug 2026, 17:5215,150first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 15,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,810
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held33 (12 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total19,070
Reactions total1,044
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 08s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,791 reactions across 33 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,33129.9%
👍1,62320.8%
😁1,57820.3%
🔥1,05613.6%
🤣4125.29%
🤔1952.50%
🙈1672.14%
🤓791.01%
👌720.924%
💯580.744%
🎃400.513%
🤝330.424%
🥰250.321%
💋200.257%
🐳160.205%
💔160.205%
❤‍🔥130.167%
🦄130.167%
😍110.141%
🤗90.116%
6 further kinds240.308%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC≈2,370 views138 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Опять Книжный клуб ЛичиКо проголосовал за самую, казалось бы, неочевидную книгу. В сентябре мы читаем «Дом Эльмиры» Виктора Гранта. Это мистический детектив вот с такой аннотацией: «Виктор Левандер, психотерапевт с необычной репутацией, приезжает к морю отдохнуть от рутины и побыть в одиночестве. Он поселяется в доме недавно умершей женщины, умной, холодной, раздражающей и, как выясняется, слишком живой, чтобы так …

❤69👍51😁13🤔5

2 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC≈2,710 views191 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Дочитываю «Ревматологию в лицах». Сначала относилась к содержанию чуть скептично, потому что книга похожа на миллион подобных изданий, только с ревматологическим уклоном. Построена она по следующему принципу: сначала дается биография известной исторической персоны, включая состояние ее здоровья. Затем идёт небольшая справка о том, какой бы диагноз поставили ей в наше время и можно ли было оказать какую-то существенн…

❤105🔥53💔16👍12🤓5

1 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC≈3,410 views200 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пожалуй, 1 сентября - лучшее время для отмены «синдрома отличника». Не дочитывать неинтересные книги - это нормально. Не все книги нам подходят. Если мы что-то не дочитаем, двойку никто не поставит и родителей в школу не вызовет. 😁 Я вот, например, бросила так любимые многими «Ацтек» Гэри Дженнингса и «Корни» Алекса Хейли. Кстати, ничего страшного при этом не случилось. 🤷‍♀️ Расскажите, какую книгу вы решили не …

👍131🔥37❤28💘4

31 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈3,900 views200 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пока я в деревне, перешла в режим чтения электронки. Наметила на неделю: Елена Выставкина «Ревматология в лицах» Прочитано 40%. Очень неплохо. Ревматологии мало, биографий много 😁. Книга идет бодренько. Сиран Джей Чжао «Железная вдова» Прочитано 24%. Неожиданно увлеклась. Точно не ждала такого. Думала, это ромфант, но нет. Или вернее, ПОКА точно нет. Константин Куксин «Хозяин белых оленей». Прочитано 31%. Да, …

👍130❤58🔥12

27 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈6,680 views315 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Заело… 🤪

😁219❤53🤣43

25 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈7,310 views160 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Помните, говорила вам, что мой FitStars всегда со мной, даже если я не тренируюсь, лопаю пироженки и при мысли о тренировках морщу нос? И вот - паба-ба-бам! - час настал, решение созрело, я просто протянула руку к телефону и… уже танцую латину, делаю растяжку и подумываю о силовых. А если бы у меня не было подписки Fitstars, пришлось бы морально настраиваться на похода в тренажерку, выкраивать деньги на абонемент, з…

❤118🥰19😁7🙈6😍5👌4💋1

24 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈5,670 views255 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Какой-то август у меня получился вялый в читательском плане. Зато текущее чтение вдохновляет. 😍 Кстати, рассказала об этом на Boosty. Обязательно посмотрите! Там и про прочитанное - негодую (как можно серийного маньяка сделать героем-любовником), и делюсь первыми впечатлениями от начатых книг (вот эти красавчики на картинке 👆), и раскрываю меркантильные книжные планы. 😁 А еще на всех каналах вышло новое видео с про…

❤155👍78👌22

20 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈8,230 views198 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Тот случай, когда книга мимо Читаю сейчас книгу, которая рассказывает о героях, попавших в сказку: сказочные декорации, волшебный мир, мрачные приключения… Ощущается как история, условно, для девочек 12+. Но! По уровню жесткости это совершенно точно 18+. На обложке, кстати, тоже стоит соответствующая маркировка, так что претензий к издательству ноль. В общем, читаю и ловлю себя на мысли, что это может быть огромно…

❤123👍65👌5🤔3🎉1🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈7,370 views271 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А я сегодня новый опыт переживала. Сходила на арт-практику. Понятия не имела, что это такое, но я всегда за любой движ и расширение горизонтов. В итоге поразмышляли о способах достижения личных целей через творчество Сезанна. Рисую я примерно никак, но гору свою изобразила. Если что, в нижнем левом углу не синее пятно, а моя голова в капюшоне с опушкой. 😁 Необычное и интересное мероприятие получилось. И главное, о…

👍136❤98🔥18👌15❤‍🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC≈8,480 views238 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

И еще одно задание со звездочкой. Найди в кадре полтергейст. 🙈 P.S. Если что, целиком видео выйдет завтра.

😁150🎃40🤓21❤19🔥7👌1

17 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC≈8,280 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Очередная задачка со звёздочкой. Требуется помощь знатоков уровня Продвинутый. Содержанию какой книги может соответствовать это изображение? Правильных ответов нет. Просто скажите, какая книга первой приходит в голову. У меня сейчас в черепной коробке только звуки сверчков.

❤82🤔13🙉3🎉2

17 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈7,020 views185 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Друзья, какой замечательный бокс пришёл мне от организаторов проекта «Инженеры слова». 😍 Это литературный конкурс, объединяющий писателей, инженеров, чтецов и художников. Проводится с 2022 г. Изначально назывался «Проект особого значения», а с 2026 г. получил новое имя - «Инженеры слова». P.S. При распаковке я почему-то упорно называю конкурс премией 🙈, так как являюсь большим любителем что-нибудь напутать. Не будь…

👍89🔥51❤36😁7❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @ludmilalichy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTCAnonymous Poll1,340 voters approx.

Вопрос только для заядлых читателей: Вы говорите Нечитай или Нечитун?

  1. Нечитай36%
  2. Нечитун50%
  3. Не знаю, что это5%
  4. Использую другое слово10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книга в Ухе. Аудиокниги
@kvuhe · 150,613
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 August 2026
Bookspace
@anya_bookspace · 27,301
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Николай Жаринов 💀
@litsomel · 30,536
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
Books around me
@booksaroundme · 21,787
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
Кулинарим с Таней 🌸 ЛУЧШИЕ РЕЦЕПТЫ🌿
@kulinarimstanej · 86,048
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
PunkMonk
@punkmonkprod · 21,002
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Людмила Личи” (@ludmilalichy), 15,181 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ludmilalichy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.