Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LUM

Channel

LUM

@lum4mem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,841subscribers

+103 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002091009054
TypeChannel
Username@lum4mem
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lum4mem

Growth

3,7383,8413,789.56 August 2026 — 3,738 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,738 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,745 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,757 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,774 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,797 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,792 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,790 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,796 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,812 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,831 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,841 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,723–3,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:403,841+10
4 Sept 2026, 01:193,831+19
31 Aug 2026, 18:483,812+16
28 Aug 2026, 11:173,796+6
25 Aug 2026, 04:063,790-2
21 Aug 2026, 15:563,792-5
18 Aug 2026, 09:033,797+23
15 Aug 2026, 19:143,774+17
12 Aug 2026, 03:143,757+12
8 Aug 2026, 23:343,745+7
6 Aug 2026, 05:153,738no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:083,738first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 47 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,593 reactions across 27 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁95059.6%
custom 533249138736972206717410.9%
custom 5332478644201754989875.46%
😭734.58%
664.14%
🔥472.95%
🫡422.64%
💅332.07%
🤝271.69%
🌚201.26%
💩161.00%
🗿140.879%
70.439%
🤯60.377%
50.314%
😈50.314%
🥴50.314%
😍40.251%
🤡40.251%
20.126%
5 further kinds60.377%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,593 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC952 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Гарних вихідних 🥰

custom 5332478644201754989197😁5🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC960 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁59💅3🤡3😭1custom 53324786442017549891

7 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,010 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁49🔥7💩4custom 53324786442017549893🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,020 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А давайте вислідкуємо відписників і влаштуємо між ними петушіні підпільні бої ?

😁34💅4🔥2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC907 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @JustYourBPhoto

мої підписники ❤️

😁4772custom 53324786442017549892🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,170 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LUM

custom 533249138736972206725🔥6😍4custom 53324786442017549891

7 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,250 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁81custom 53324786442017549899💅4

7 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,810 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пора заводити профспілки фуристів

custom 533249138736972206720custom 53324786442017549897🔥52

7 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,240 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А пахне як

custom 5332491387369722067276custom 53324786442017549896🙏1

7 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,340 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁49custom 53324786442017549896💅4💩4

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @lum4mem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LUM” (@lum4mem), 3,841 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lum4mem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.