Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for lunafawn

Channel

lunafawn

@lunafawn_exr

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002835649944
TypeChannel
Username@lunafawn_exr
Descriptionexpress, not impress ᡣ𐭩 анонимка: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=lunafawn
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
On Telegramt.me/lunafawn_exr

Previous handles

@lunafawn_exr was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@notlunafawn
held 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026

Growth

38403912 August 2026 — 38 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40 subscribers12 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:4540no change
28 Aug 2026, 21:3040+2
12 Aug 2026, 18:3338no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:3138first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.0%
avg views ÷ 40 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
58.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held22 (20 May 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total24
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
51
Videos
2
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52517316999638001405931.1%
❤4423.2%
custom 52514648450557636012513.2%
💔147.37%
❤‍🔥105.26%
👍94.74%
custom 541146907136964856984.21%
🫡52.63%
😢42.11%
custom 543162189973607442331.58%
🍓31.58%
💋31.58%
💘21.05%
🤬10.526%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC24 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

japanese coded 📿🍵

custom 525173169996380014011❤1💋1custom 52514648450557636011

18 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC50 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

мои кадры ꒰ᐢ. .ᐢ꒱₊˚⊹ с днем рождения, ❤️🥹 jocals 🥹❤️

custom 52517316999638001409❤3custom 52514648450557636013

18 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC25 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @top_dopsVideo

🌕 DRUM SHOW FAN ANIMATION (telegram version) #допс_проекты

❤4

10 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC12 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gspdsbkkPhoto

🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 🔫🔫My blood 🔫🔫жмурка |-/ 🔫🔫lunafawn 🔫🔫маркоф 🔫🔫лает, но не кусает 🔫🔫rest!¡ yo яблоко убрали из выборов, но внизу можно хотя бы за понравившуюся работу проголосовать👇

❤3custom 52517316999638001401

10 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC22 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

быстро быстро рисую тренд пока он не закончился 🤍

custom 52514648450557636015❤2custom 52517316999638001402

7 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC65 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

произошел котенок

custom 525146484505576360111custom 52517316999638001407❤2

6 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC31 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

зацените прайм кликарта из 2019

custom 52517316999638001406custom 52514648450557636013❤1

3 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC68 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

с днем хейта я решила сделать все три варианта тренда про скилл (пока ток низкий выложила) и хейта настолько много, что тт сам массово сносит комменты, а я вижу только "а вот не надо мои коммы удалять" мне кажется абсолютно очевидно, что такая подача существует просто чтобы набрать просмотры. я и сама не в восторге от превью картинок с нытьем и подобных трендов, но к сожалению хоть какие-то просмотры набирает тольк…

👍8💔2🤬1

3 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC43 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❌️ посмотреть таймлапс и убедиться что не обмазка ✅️ я больше тебя разбираюсь в искусстве я сам художник

🫡4

29 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

кстати, если вам меня не хватает (ну вдруг 😳) приходите в тикитоки , я выкладываю видео каждый день вот такой хиатус у меня, понятно у кого училась

❤1👍1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @lunafawn_exr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“lunafawn” (@lunafawn_exr), 40 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lunafawn_exr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.