Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lunarch🌙

Channel

Lunarch🌙

@lunarch768

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001957979027
TypeChannel
Username@lunarch768
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lunarch768

Growth

217246.56 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers13 August 2026 — 71 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25 subscribers256 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:2125+3
7 Sept 2026, 15:2222+1
21 Aug 2026, 01:0421-50
13 Aug 2026, 13:0771-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:4672no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:3572first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3836.9%
3433.0%
🔥1716.5%
custom 538003599243662152354.85%
🥰32.91%
custom 544526589414396160221.94%
custom 531898183832309409910.971%
custom 536633027934868229010.971%
👍10.971%
💋10.971%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTCviews —

Lunarch🌙 pinned «Ребятки, что-то я так посидела, подумала, в общем хочу устроить чистку. Пишите в комментарии "+" если хотите остаться в канале, кто не отметиться я буду удалять, по этому вот так вот. Отмечайтесь до 14 августа включительно, а 15 я уже буду чистить.»

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ребятки, что-то я так посидела, подумала, в общем хочу устроить чистку. Пишите в комментарии "+" если хотите остаться в канале, кто не отметиться я буду удалять, по этому вот так вот. Отмечайтесь до 14 августа включительно, а 15 я уже буду чистить.

❤‍🔥3

1 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC120 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

5❤‍🔥1🔥1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC55 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

мье-хе-хе, вот и мои близнецы-эмпаты, хыхыхы 🥹

custom 53800359924366215235🔥1🥰1custom 53663302793486822901custom 54452658941439616021

26 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥4🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC64 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ураураура. вот и мой парнишка

❤‍🔥7🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @SnoWMoth_KorPhoto

Сидела скетчила, ужасно устала Потому что одновременно пишу Рай когда допишу, вы можете прочесть в канале по инфе о мире или же в беседе специальной ;) Зато шутка про двух Терр, ееее

4❤‍🔥1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC67 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

утиии, мою Виндрочку нарисовали)❤️

❤‍🔥61👍1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC68 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я уже забываю что это всего лишь скетчи...🙂 Ну что, остались последние два бога, вот с ними у меня небольшие проблемки, но решим, ничего не поделать.

5❤‍🔥2🔥1🥰1

19 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC54 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот, закончила ещë Ниэроса с Террой🥺

5❤‍🔥1🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC62 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Готова вам представить первого из Пантеона Древних — Ауриэля) Да может он не очень смахивает на олицетворение света, но я решила раскрасить его под цвета самого солнца, а там очень много красного, вот собственно он тут и присутствует, тёмный, почти чёрный ассоциируется с его характером, что он готов принимать самые жестокие методы, что бы ясный только ему самому порядок сохранялся. В общем у меня ангелочки и их Бог-

3🔥2❤‍🔥1💋1custom 53189818383230940991custom 54452658941439616021

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lunarch768. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lunarch🌙” (@lunarch768), 25 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lunarch768.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.