Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,908. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 04:56
8
-1,763
16 Sept 2026, 00:41
1,771
-5
15 Sept 2026, 02:22
1,776
no change
15 Sept 2026, 01:47
1,776
+1,766
9 Sept 2026, 07:16
10
-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:34
11
-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:48
12
+7
17 Aug 2026, 13:06
5
-1,889
14 Aug 2026, 10:57
1,894
-36
10 Aug 2026, 19:55
1,930
+9
7 Aug 2026, 14:12
1,921
+5
6 Aug 2026, 17:48
1,916
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 47 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
523 reactions across 46 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
245
46.8%
🍓
72
13.8%
💘
62
11.9%
❤🔥
54
10.3%
custom 5346304345791045418
26
4.97%
🔥
22
4.21%
⚡
21
4.02%
💋
8
1.53%
🕊
6
1.15%
🤩
6
1.15%
🍾
1
0.191%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ищу художника который сможет отрисовать несколько баннеров для оформления канала за робуксы
Нужно 3-4 арта с незамысловатыми роблокс персонажами в блокси стиле (прикрепленные картинки)
Можете скинуть в коммы/лс примеры ваших работ и дедлайн. Подходящим художникам отпишу в лс и обговорим подробности.
Оплату я могу скинуть по плюсу (от вас никаких действий не требуется) или по геймпассу (нужно создать геймпасс). Такж…
Animal Hospital confession pinned «Розыгрыш 10-ти пассов Head Nurse в игре Animal Hospital 10 победителей получат по 1 классу Главная медсестра на свои аккаунты в Roblox (или просто то количество робуксов которое стоит этот пасс) Единственное условие - быть подписчиком этого канала: @AnimalAnomaly…»
Розыгрыш 10-ти пассов Head Nurse в игре Animal Hospital
10 победителей получат по 1 классу Главная медсестра на свои аккаунты в Roblox (или просто то количество робуксов которое стоит этот пасс)
Единственное условие - быть подписчиком этого канала: @AnimalAnomaly
Не хочу, чтобы вы сильно расстраивались из-за того, что тематика канала меняется. Здесь часто будут проходить розыгрыши робуксов, на которые можно будет …
быстрый скетч с моей дурехой и табличка отношений с другими персами (иу очередная сьюха девушка барни фу как так можно)🍓🍓
неанон хоряшко ураган @choreycane
#Тейк | @animalanomaly | @AnimalHospitalTAKESbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @luqzu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
3
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@luqzu named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@jen1f0r named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 24 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@kustar_0off named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@yaumstvennootstalyyyy named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 30 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Castelvaynia” (@luqzu), 8 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luqzu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
