Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Luzhetsky

Channel

Luzhetsky

@luzhetsky_v

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

325subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001608635532
TypeChannel
Username@luzhetsky_v
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luzhetsky_v

Growth

3173253216 August 2026 — 317 subscribers6 August 2026 — 317 subscribers20 August 2026 — 320 subscribers26 August 2026 — 323 subscribers4 September 2026 — 325 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 316–326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 04:58325+2
26 Aug 2026, 22:16323+3
20 Aug 2026, 22:36320+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:16317no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:36317first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

275 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 608887304846154733412445.1%
custom 52311278184269426633211.6%
custom 52355921534632692223111.3%
😁269.45%
custom 5339314746078276018207.27%
custom 5305561336833385030196.91%
custom 5339467870252338032114.00%
custom 5407048618014174253114.00%
💔10.364%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC116 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖖

custom 523112781842694266312custom 60888730484615473346😁5custom 52355921534632692223

30 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC157 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

"Запретный город", Пекин 🐉

custom 608887304846154733422custom 540704861801417425311custom 52355921534632692228custom 53055613368333850304💔1

28 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC174 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩

custom 608887304846154733432custom 523559215346326922215custom 53393147460782760187custom 53055613368333850301

26 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC196 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пекин

custom 608887304846154733431custom 533931474607827601813custom 53055613368333850308custom 52355921534632692223

13 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC303 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😋

😁19custom 608887304846154733416custom 523112781842694266315custom 53055613368333850305

8 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC346 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐰

custom 608887304846154733417custom 533946787025233803211custom 52311278184269426635😁2custom 52355921534632692222custom 53055613368333850301

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @luzhetsky_v. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Luzhetsky” (@luzhetsky_v), 325 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luzhetsky_v.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.