Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lys Blanc 🌙

Channel

Lys Blanc 🌙

@lys_blanc_cos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003726161914
TypeChannel
Username@lys_blanc_cos
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lys_blanc_cos

Growth

334036.58 August 2026 — 33 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35 subscribers23 August 2026 — 38 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:5540+2
23 Aug 2026, 22:2838+3
16 Aug 2026, 19:0435+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:0134no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:3134+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:1733first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53192889585495226582151.2%
custom 53189069598632455961434.1%
custom 5319191540101311282512.2%
custom 531459036740690990012.44%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53192889585495226581

8 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53192889585495226582

8 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53192889585495226583

8 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53192889585495226582

4 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC50 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Я уже не знаю, как это выносить 😭 Я сам на это согласился

custom 53189069598632455967

1 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC53 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мне просто предложили проект... Я просто согласился... А теперь вся галлерея, весь тик-ток и все чаты завалены одним единственным персом. Еле держусь, чтобы не бросить все и не начать его шить 🫠🫠🫠

custom 53192889585495226586custom 53145903674069099001custom 53189069598632455961custom 53191915401013112821

28 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC60 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот и подошел к концу мой первый полноценный фестиваль... И я, пожалуй, начну в хронологическом порядке. День 1. Мы приехали в пятницу сонные на фотосессию сразу из другого города. Из минусов: я умер в костюме на крыше. Из плюсов: люди и атмосфера. Фотосет у невероятной Dio вышел просто восторг, а также отдельно хочу поблагодарить обеих наших помощниц и Вэл, которая каждые 15 минут проверяла, жив ли я, чем очень сил

custom 53192889585495226585custom 53191915401013112824custom 53189069598632455963

28 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC41 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @gegesha_mainPhoto

Немного фоточек с крыши @Syndrigasty_86 (Хуго — Папа 1) @AlexShab8 (Ликаон — Папа 2)

custom 53189069598632455963custom 53192889585495226582

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lys_blanc_cos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lys Blanc 🌙” (@lys_blanc_cos), 40 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lys_blanc_cos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.