#q
👍10

Channel
@m16mkII
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,010subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001610643290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @m16mkII |
| Description | Be Nice 聊天在這 https://t.me/m16chat 二氧化氯相關報告 https://t.me/m16ClO2Journals |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/m16mkII |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:19 | 6,010 | +4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 6,006 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:05 | 6,017 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 6,010 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 6,011 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 6,013 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 6,011 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 6,012 | -4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 6,016 | -15 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 6,031 | -11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 6,042 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 6,048 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 6,047 | +18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 6,029 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 6,028 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 6,023 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 6,011 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 6,006 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 6,003 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 6,000 | first reading |
83 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 10,076 |
| Reactions total | 296 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,167 reactions across 83 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 350 | 30.0% | |
| 👍 | 318 | 27.2% | |
| 🤣 | 173 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 88 | 7.54% | |
| 💯 | 76 | 6.51% | |
| 😁 | 65 | 5.57% | |
| 😱 | 63 | 5.40% | |
| 🎉 | 25 | 2.14% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.428% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.343% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (26.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#q
👍10
覺得德州有任何可能翻盤的要去看看腦子. 繼續看吧, Panicans. #electionfraud
👍9🔥2
這遊戲帥的…是敵人 #videogames
🤣4
加州開票4分鐘, 計票0%, 各媒體宣布民主黨獲勝. #electionfraud #ca
🔥15😁3🤣1
這次是更進一步的選舉舞弊, 看接下來幾個月了. #q
🔥11
MS NOW 又開始說, 選舉結果可能需要數週才能出爐. 民主黨又想要作弊了. Rachel Maddow, "任何試圖告訴你選舉結果有可疑之處的人, 都是想騙你." 惡人先告狀. #electionfraud
🔥18
這是在 New Hamster 的 TDS 病患, Libtard 怎都這個樣? 情緒不穩+暴力. 快抓起來喔! #libtard #newhempshire
🔥11
能烙人圍毆就是開心
🤣7
好巧, 通關都48小時 😂 這應該是我的 Game of the Year 🌝 #videogames
😁5
在國會大廈附近, 親巴勒斯坦人士扯下並焚燒了美國國旗, 換上了巴勒斯坦國旗, 並噴塗了 Hamas 字樣, 還寫上毀了美國. 這些人就是恐怖份子. #terrorist
🔥18
就是這個咖啡豆, 不換了 🥰 #qoffee
👍9🙏1
支持穆斯林的女性真的是腦子壞掉 😂 #muslim
💯18🤣4
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @m16mkII. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“好奇害死貓” (@m16mkII), 6,010 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m16mkII.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.