Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for M4和平官方频道(无敌稳定中)

Channel

M4和平官方频道(无敌稳定中)

@m416loader

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,190subscribers

+1,966 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004352324100
TypeChannel
Username@m416loader
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/m416loader

Growth

4,2246,1905,2077 August 2026 — 4,224 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,264 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,375 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,520 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,569 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,744 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,035 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,680 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,998 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,076 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,190 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +1,966. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,929–6,485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 18:186,190+114
1 Sept 2026, 15:336,076+78
29 Aug 2026, 11:165,998+318
26 Aug 2026, 16:175,680+645
23 Aug 2026, 17:545,035+291
20 Aug 2026, 12:364,744+175
17 Aug 2026, 12:174,569+49
14 Aug 2026, 09:454,520+145
11 Aug 2026, 10:224,375+111
8 Aug 2026, 02:284,264+40
7 Aug 2026, 14:474,224first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.43%
avg views ÷ 6,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
275
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held12 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,098
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5995.2%
34.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC272 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

这就是用了M4的效果,用了之后爆率真高,一天上3个亿

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC498 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @m416kingPhoto

重要通知:M4和平版本无永久卡密也没有永久版本 所谓的内部版本皆为虚假版本和虚假宣传 特别是像这种的要拓展组件的就是圈钱 买完钱就被骗走了!还有说不同地方买的有的地方有效果有的地方没效果 自己想想被骗的搞不搞笑 发现这种诈骗行为欢迎向我举报 @fzdzking 我会把他们的宣传渠道一个个封杀干净

👍142

Signed 𝐾𝑖𝑛𝑔 IP 中国上海

7 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,130 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC806 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3

Signed 24h在线客服

7 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC694 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍5

Signed 24h在线客服

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @m416loader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“M4和平官方频道(无敌稳定中)” (@m416loader), 6,190 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m416loader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.