Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
الشيخ عبد الرحمن ناصر البراك
@mAlBraak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,701subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001444737714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mAlBraak |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mAlBraak |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 7,701 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 7,709 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 7,703 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 7,693 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 7,686 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 7,675 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 7,670 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 7,663 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 7,654 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 7,653 | first reading |
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.55%
- avg views ÷ 7,701 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 350
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (1 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,463 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15m 14s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
التعليق على كتاب: أحكام القرآن لابن العربي المالكي الدرس رقم 055 لفضيلة الشيخ عبدالرحمن بن ناصر البراك -حفظه الله-
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
التعليق على كتاب: درء تعارض العقل والنقل الدرس رقم 028 لفضيلة الشيخ عبدالرحمن بن ناصر البراك -حفظه الله-
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @mAlBraak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ktbalbadr · 30,744
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
@droselmyh · 38,258
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
@Rawa3_IbnTaymia · 40,692
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@al_khotab · 32,674
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
@ktbmB_othaimen · 33,842
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 September 2026
@albadr9 · 30,551
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
@dorarnet_telegram · 108,695
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
@binothaimeen · 40,046
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
@abntaymia3 · 51,221
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@Drsalehs · 40,413
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
@twjehdm · 36,761
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
@aladwey · 52,882
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@alsseerah · 103,574
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sualruhaily · 62,843
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
@abdulazizatarefe · 59,066
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
@dralfawzann · 40,742
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
@mtoon_aqeeda · 36,342
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
@M_shangiti · 31,079
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
@mnmhln · 36,026
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
@Talam_Hadith · 50,139
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
@ktbibnalqaim · 87,122
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@saadalkhthlan · 35,734
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
@jobstaif · 41,287
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@MishrefAqidah · 35,214
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشيخ عبد الرحمن ناصر البراك” (@mAlBraak), 7,701 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mAlBraak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.