Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الأخصائي النفسي: محمد الأسطى

Channel

الأخصائي النفسي: محمد الأسطى

@maalastaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,104subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001598700007
TypeChannel
Username@maalastaa
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maalastaa

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,1044,1654,134.56 August 2026 — 4,165 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,161 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,156 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,152 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,154 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,148 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,141 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,133 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,132 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,130 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,125 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,120 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,121 subscribers27 September 2026 — 4,104 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 52 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,095–4,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 05:214,104-17
17 Sept 2026, 19:404,121+1
13 Sept 2026, 23:574,120-5
10 Sept 2026, 00:184,125-5
4 Sept 2026, 14:184,130-2
1 Sept 2026, 05:144,132-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:134,133-8
26 Aug 2026, 20:434,141-7
24 Aug 2026, 03:544,148-6
20 Aug 2026, 02:334,154+2
16 Aug 2026, 20:244,152-4
13 Aug 2026, 01:264,156-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:214,161-4
6 Aug 2026, 16:404,165no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:184,165first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17779.4%
👍4520.2%
😢10.448%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maalastaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC326 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ليست كل المشاعر تحتاج إلى إصلاح... بعضها تحتاج فقط إلى أن نفهمها، ونتعلم كيف نعيش معها دون أن تقود حياتنا.

❤8

2 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC402 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

الذكاء الاصطناعي أصبح داخل غرفة العلاج... حتى لو لم تستخدمه أنت. ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ وفقًا للجمعية الأمريكية لعلم النفس (APA)، أفاد 77% من الأخصائيين النفسيين أن مرضاهم يستخدمون أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي، وأكثر من ثلثهم قالوا إن بعض المرضى يتعاملون معها كمصدر إضافي للدعم النفسي. لذلك توصي APA بأن يسأل المعالج مرضاه بشكل مباشر: هل تستخدم أي أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي لدعمك النفسي؟ ليس بهدف المنع، بل لفهم: - ما الذي يح…

❤9👍4

12 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2076177736326951383

👍4

26 Jun 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,420 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://substack.com/@maalasta/note/c-283325616?r=4khmu9

❤1

13 Jun 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,530 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/1759245878869557707

❤4👍1

10 Jun 2026, 05:27 UTC≈1,580 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في تشريح العزلة: حين يلتقي قلق الوجود بأسر الموروث ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ​يبدأ الأمر دائماً بنوع من الحيرة الصامتة؛ تلك اللحظة المباغتة التي يتوقف فيها ضجيج الحياة اليومية، فيجد الإنسان نفسه وحيداً أمام عري كينونته. في تلك العتمة الاسترجاعية، يرتطم الوعي بأسئلته العتيقة والمؤجلة: قلق الفناء، عبء الحرية، والبحث المضني عن معنى يملأ فراغ الوجود. بيد أن هذه المواجهة السيكولوجية، التي تبدو في ظاهرها تجربة فردية محضة…

❤8

8 Jun 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في تشريح الأزمة الوجودية: من استقالة الوعي إلى استعادة الكينونة ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ​إن حلول الأزمة النفسية في الذات الإنسانية ليس مجرد اضطراب موضعي في المزاج، بل هو – في تقديرنا البنيوي والوجودي – "مأزق في الفهم" و"مواجهة حادة مع حقائق الوجود المخرومة"؛ حيث يصطدم الإنسان فجأة بحقائق يالوم الأربع: (الموت، والحرية ومسؤوليتها، والعزلة الوجودية، وغياب المعنى الجاهز). ​وقت الأزمة، يقع العقل في فخ التشتت والاستقال…

❤9

7 Jun 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,200 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في نقد البنية التفاعلية: العلاقة العلاجية كفضاء معرفي وإنساني آمن ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ​في الممارسة العيادية النفسية، نقع كثيراً في فخ ميكانيكية العلاج؛ إذ يُظن خطأً أن الشفاء هو نتاج حتمي لتطبيق "استراتيجيات معرفية وسلوكية معزولة". لكن التدقيق البنيوي في شروط التغيير النفسي يثبت أن العلاقة العلاجية ليست مجرد وسيلة أو حامل خارجي للعلاج، بل هي بنية العلاج ذاته؛ إنها تلك المساحة الآمنة التي تعيد صياغة الوعي بالذا…

❤8😢1

11 May 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,470 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

مساء الخير يا أصدقاء في داخل الإنسان ميلٌ خفي إلى تأجيل ما يعلم يقينًا أنه نافع له… ليس جهلًا، بل مفارقة نفسية عميقة: أن تعرف الطريق… ولا تسلكه. نحن لا نؤجّل لأننا لا نملك الوقت، بل لأن في داخلنا مقاومة دقيقة لكل ما يتطلب انضباطًا. كأن النفس—بطبيعتها—تميل إلى الراحة القريبة، حتى لو كان ثمنها قلقًا بعيد المدى. ولو تأملنا هذه الظاهرة بعين تحليلية سنجد أن التسويف ليس مجرد عادة سيئة، بل محاولة لتجنّب شعور أعمق: الخوف…

❤34👍6

9 May 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,360 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/maalasta/p/5fa?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4khmu9

❤1

8 May 2026, 20:45 UTC≈3,470 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في وقت أصبح فيه المحتوى سطحيًا وسريع الاستهلاك، يظهر تطبيق Substack كمساحة مختلفة تمامًا… مساحة تُعيد للكتابة قيمتها، وللفكرة عمقها. سبستاك ليس مجرد منصة نشر… هو بيئة فكرية كاملة: - تكتب ما تؤمن به، لا ما يطلبه الترند - تبني جمهورًا حقيقيًا مهتمًا بما تقول، لا مجرد أرقام - تتحكم في محتواك وعلاقتك مع المتابعين بدون وسيط ما يميّزه فعلًا: أن العلاقة بين الكاتب والقارئ هنا “علاقة مباشرة”، أشبه بجلسة صادقة… بدون تشويش ا…

❤9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maalastaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جامعة الملك فيصل KFU 🎖️
@KFU_P · 23,729
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الأخصائي النفسي: محمد الأسطى” (@maalastaa), 4,104 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maalastaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.