Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for macnzi

Channel

macnzi

@macnzi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

69,645subscribers

+48,992 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002740284770
TypeChannel
Username@macnzi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/macnzi

Growth

20,19469,64544,919.56 August 2026 — 20,653 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,635 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,592 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,473 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,412 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,392 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,292 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,214 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,212 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,194 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,209 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,660 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,192 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,381 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,704 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,013 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,233 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,362 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,445 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,618 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,726 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,758 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,784 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,558 subscribers3 September 2026 — 41,066 subscribers4 September 2026 — 48,678 subscribers8 September 2026 — 69,645 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net +48,992. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,776–77,063 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 07:2069,645+20,967
4 Sept 2026, 23:1848,678+7,612
3 Sept 2026, 10:0241,066+11,508
2 Sept 2026, 05:3629,558+6,774
1 Sept 2026, 08:4422,784+26
31 Aug 2026, 05:3922,758+32
30 Aug 2026, 02:4522,726+108
29 Aug 2026, 02:3322,618+173
28 Aug 2026, 00:5622,445+83
27 Aug 2026, 00:4622,362+129
26 Aug 2026, 01:3822,233+220
25 Aug 2026, 04:1622,013+309
23 Aug 2026, 22:1321,704+323
22 Aug 2026, 04:0721,381+189
20 Aug 2026, 17:3421,192+532
19 Aug 2026, 14:5720,660+451
18 Aug 2026, 15:2220,209+15
17 Aug 2026, 13:2820,194-18
16 Aug 2026, 05:3420,212-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:5620,214first reading

Engagement

221 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 69,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,350
182 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
182
of 221 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held221 (3 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total1,520,350
Reactions total95,026
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32m 53s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 111 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113,237 reactions across 221 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣104,27592.1%
💔2,6762.36%
👍1,9081.68%
👎1,7061.51%
1,6211.43%
🔥1,0510.928%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 221 of the 221 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113,237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 221 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
162
across the posts below
Posts paid on
33
of 221 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @macnzi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 221 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 18:17 UTC≈5,230 views384 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

@macnzi

🤣354👎18💔6🔥5👍1

Signed PEPSI

7 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈7,480 views632 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

@macnzi

🤣610👍173🔥2

Signed Abas

7 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTC≈9,090 views552 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

@macnzi

🤣517💔20🔥6👎52👍2

Signed PEPSI

7 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈9,120 views597 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

@macnzi

🤣577👍116🔥3

Signed Abas

7 Sept 2026, 06:38 UTC≈11,100 views601 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

@macnzi

🤣58215👍3💔1

Signed Abas

7 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC≈9,410 views656 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

@macnzi

🤣608👍443🔥1

Signed Abas

6 Sept 2026, 20:29 UTC≈12,100 views584 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

@macnzi

🤣516💔52🔥104👎2

Signed

6 Sept 2026, 18:01 UTC≈14,100 views763 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

@macnzi

🤣580👍132👎2216🔥8💔5

Signed

6 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC≈14,900 views768 reactions2 Starsread 7 September 2026
Video

@macnzi

🤣71040👎6👍5💔4🔥3

Signed PEPSI

6 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC≈14,300 views895 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

@macnzi

🤣86911👍7👎4💔2🔥2

Signed Abas

6 Sept 2026, 11:34 UTC≈15,100 views896 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

@macnzi

🤣730👍83👎4129💔8🔥5

Signed

6 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC≈15,600 views592 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

@macnzi

🤣5768👍4👎3💔1

Signed Abas

Showing the 12 most recent of 221 posts we hold for @macnzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@macnzi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“macnzi” (@macnzi), 69,645 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/macnzi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.