可能是国内最好用的 Bot 产品,墨问 Bot 做出来了,Mac 版本客户端,可以试试,free https://note.mowen.cn/detail/qeYK-FSvCp6Kdlrad6gc_ 下载地址:https://pub-sdn-001.mowen.cn/mo/release/mo-agent/Mowen-0.6.3.dmg

Channel
时间的切片
@mactalk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,871subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001120515412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mactalk |
| Created | 25 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mactalk |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 6,871 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 6,872 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 6,870 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:15 | 6,877 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 6,882 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 6,887 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 6,889 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 6,895 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 6,897 | -18 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 6,915 | -13 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 6,928 | -20 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 6,948 | -7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 6,955 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 6,961 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 6,964 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:03 | 6,971 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 6,972 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 6,979 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 6,980 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 6,984 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 10 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.6%
- avg views ÷ 6,871 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,000
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (10 November 2025 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 512
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 441
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
好了,现在东西做出来了:https://cat.mowen.cn/ 介绍在这里:https://note.mowen.cn/detail/9BFsFPy0npWeXcu5hujU2
Coding Agent 会让人产生大量的错觉,做出个东西觉得是个绝世好产品,发出来之后发现,除了自己基本没人用。这样的东西会大量产生。 然后,真正的好产品就会出现了。 另一方面,很多人还以为 Coding Agent 是玩具,经常问我,你见过啥好产品是 Coding Agent 做出来的。 其实现在各大 AI 厂商更新应用类产品那么频繁,你还以为是手工编程呢?全 AI 写的。尤其是工具类。 Claude 的 Cowork,字节的 SOLO,包括前一阵子发布 Gemini 桌面版,包括 OpenClaw,基本都是 Coding Agent 的产物。未来的所有产品和更新,都会有 Coding Agent 的影子,到最后都是 Coding Agent 的作品。
Signed CatMomo
Coding Agent 越来越强大,激活了老一辈早就不写代码的工程师,我看很多七零后每天咔咔提交代码,不亦说乎。 这是终于觉得自己又行了,而且不限语言和平台,想用 Go 就用 Go,想写 Swift 就写 Swift,前后端 Web、iOS 、安卓、Mac App 一切都平趟,一言不合就编程,这简直太爽了。 考验创意和想象力的时候到了。目前大部分人的状态是给自己做了个东西,很兴奋,阿妹zing啊,古德白啊,等推荐给别人的时候,发现别人也在做自己的 App,对你的产品毫无兴趣。 这就有点尴尬,但是不要紧,你可以接着 Vibe 下一个,你至少有这个机会。
Signed CatMomo
最近 OpenClaw 很火爆,经常会有"旁观者"在群里问,这玩意能有啥用呢? 但凡仔细读过一篇好的科普文章,也能知道它的应用场景是什么。同时,这类产品依赖你自己的创造性。如果你没什么想法,那这玩意就是没啥用。它不是个修图软件、写作工具,你无法目标明确地打开它做确定的事,但同时,如果你做好了配置和扩展,它也可以成为一个修图软件和写作工具。你想法多,创意多,你就会有更多的事情交给 龙虾 去做,省下来的时间自己去玩不香吗? AI 浏览器也是一个类似的例子吗,是个多元的工具。浏览器最基本的功能就是看网页,如果你只有这一个诉求,那 AI 浏览器就没啥用。 只看网页的用户会觉得,还不给Chrome 加个翻译插件好用,遇到问题再丢给 ChatGPT 或 AI Model 呗。但对于我来说,当我在 AI 浏览器里打开墨问编辑器,这就变成了一个巨大的工作台和学习训练场,上下文和 AI 工具触手可及,效率提升几倍,那我肯定离不开这东西。 …
Signed CatMomo
📈 每日价格播报 (3月14日) 苹果 (AAPL) • 价格: ~$250-$261 (各平台略有差异) • 日涨跌: 约 -0.03% 至 -1.54% • 52周区间: $169.21 - $288.62 比特币 (BTC) • 价格: ~$70,700-$71,400 • 24小时涨跌: +0.18% 至 +2.59% • 24小时成交量: $320亿-$580亿 • 市值: ~$1.4万亿
Signed CatMomo
2026年3月5日 Anthropic 发布了 AI 对劳动力市场的影响报告 🔗 https://note.mowen.cn/detail/4TBmXoa-ivKWulux-f8mK 几分钟做了个中文版,我觉得翻译这个职业已经没了,下一个影响最大的就是估计你猜到了:程序员 😂
Signed CatMomo
墨问软件的会员订阅支持 iOS 小程序端了,以前这块因为腾讯和苹果打架,只能显示不支持。 去年腾讯和苹果终于达成协议,可以开放 iOS 端小程序的虚拟支付了。不过苹果要抽成 15%,微信支付目前无论是安卓、苹果还是 Web,都收 1%。未来不好说收多少。 2026 年 1 月微信这个通道 API 终于弄好了,我们开始陆续接入,今天上线了墨问的 iOS 端会员订阅,也就是说,现在 iOS 用户可以在小程序里看到会员订阅的入口,并且可以付费订阅了。 接着搞付费专栏。因为苹果的付费机制,好像每个专栏都得搞个 SKU,还挺麻烦的。 未来安卓小程序也得接入虚拟支付,给大厂交租子这事看起来统一了。开发者真是不容易。 我们 2026 年目标是大力发展墨问 Web 端的功能,内容和社区,也许会做一些出海的产品。这个更独立些。最近一年我们的产品付费用户也更多来自 Web,AI 让 Web 复兴确实是个机会。 前几天参加一个活动,看大部…
Signed CatMomo
Anthropic 发布的《Claude Skill 构建指南》PDF 版,一共 33 页,可下载中英文版本 🔗 下载链接:https://note.mowen.cn/detail/hIoIAhs_6YUggeS4Wb-9f 这份详尽的指南是由 Anthropic 官方发布,旨在帮助开发者和普通用户更高效地利用 Claude 的"技能"(Skills)功能。虽然 Claude 的 Skill 最早是在 2025 年 10 月随 Agent 功能一同推出的,但这份长达 32-33 页的完整版技术指南才刚刚发布。
Signed CatMomo
写了个 Skill,推荐 X 上的一些好文章 1. Claude Code 一周年 - @bcherny (Anthropic): "We shipped Claude Code as a research preview a year ago today..." 📈 2.7万观看 · 1307赞 · 92回复 🔗 https://x.com/bcherny/status/2026449617915884009 2. Notion 推出自定义 Agent - @NotionHQ: "Introducing Custom Agents. The AI team that never sleeps" 📈 64万观看 · 2257赞 · 175回复 🔗 https://x.com/NotionHQ/status/2026338860557545901 3. Anthropic Agent 自动化新玩法 - @rvivek: "An …
Signed CatMomo
Claude Code 发布一周年 类似 Claude Code 这样的 Coding Agent 已经完全改变了人们编程的方式,然而这个产品发布才短短一年,也就是去年的今天(2025.2.24)。 看到社区里不少人在庆祝 CC 发布一周年,不过对于这个软件的出品方——也就是 Anthropic——评价就有点两极分化了。 🔗 https://note.mowen.cn/detail/FP0rFh9XewHUSKnjEZhmI
Signed CatMomo
📊 野生猫大人 - 投资系列文章合集 🐾 猫眼投资系列(主线) | 编号 | 标题 | 发表时间 | 阅读 | 点赞 | 链接 | |------|------|----------|------|------|------| | 🐾 0 | 好久不见 | 2025-08-21 | 722 | 56 | https://note.mowen.cn/detail/ClsQWdXlCkmx6_UtbvBcg | | 🐾 1 | 欲行其事,先立其规 | 2025-08-28 | 1059 | 67 | https://note.mowen.cn/detail/b7Scl24j7kE4YttBL71qc | | 🐾 2 | 先筛选,再判断 | 2025-09-04 | 837 | 72 | https://note.mowen.cn/detail/t0qEx959nmNduPoe-Lhfv | | 🐾 3 | Checklist …
Signed CatMomo
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mactalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mactalk named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@weekly_books · 38,254
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
@ShadowrocketNews · 47,250
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“时间的切片” (@mactalk), 6,871 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mactalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.