Связь: @buyer_inna (рекламу не предлагать, сразу чс)
Каталоги: https://t.me/made_in_italy_msc/25509
Отзывы: @made_in_italy_otzyvi
Делись с друзьями своей «находкой», резервный канал: @made_in_italy_rezerv
Created
21 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net +514. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90,681–91,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 10:20
91,302
+132
18 Sept 2026, 21:17
91,170
+44
16 Sept 2026, 11:58
91,126
+105
14 Sept 2026, 18:58
91,021
+56
13 Sept 2026, 04:02
90,965
+7
11 Sept 2026, 02:56
90,958
+17
8 Sept 2026, 02:56
90,941
+16
5 Sept 2026, 02:14
90,925
+23
3 Sept 2026, 11:41
90,902
+8
2 Sept 2026, 03:28
90,894
-18
1 Sept 2026, 06:03
90,912
-35
31 Aug 2026, 05:43
90,947
-9
30 Aug 2026, 05:18
90,956
+15
29 Aug 2026, 07:07
90,941
-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:26
90,944
-9
27 Aug 2026, 07:23
90,953
-21
26 Aug 2026, 06:33
90,974
-14
25 Aug 2026, 07:42
90,988
-20
24 Aug 2026, 04:58
91,008
+32
22 Aug 2026, 10:35
90,976
first reading
Engagement
237 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.07%
avg views ÷ 91,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
981
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.299%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
135
of 237 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 85 of 134 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
237 (7 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
131,426
Reactions total
267
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 23:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,500
Videos
≈1,960
Links
≈1,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 01s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
435 reactions across 145 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
279
64.1%
🔥
80
18.4%
👍
45
10.3%
😍
31
7.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 161 of the 237 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 435 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 237 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 236 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @made_in_italy_msc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 237 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
‘Раз вы ведете борьбу за качество…’
Недавно мне написали по лоферам CELINE с замечанием: ‘краска внутри окрашивает кожу’
Это понятно, первая реакция, конечно 'Почему новая обувь красится? Значит, она некачественная'
Но здесь есть важный нюанс, о котором мало кто знает
Речь идет о коже с натуральным красителем.
При контакте с теплом, влагой, потом и трением часть красителя действительно может переходить на кожу но…
Инвестиция в гардероб: Стоит ли покупать CHANEL Slingbacks или выбрать Hermès Lovely?
Нас долго приучали к тому, что красивые туфли должны быть на высоком каблуке
А вот CHANEL Slingbacks и Hermès Lovely Slingback доказывают обратное
*практически нет каблука, но при этом выглядят элегантно, чтобы стать полноценной частью гардероба
Все работает на универсальность:
*каблук всего 1-2 см - ноги точно не устанут
*откры…
Заехала в офис сделать отправки
Показываю вам только небольшую часть того, что уезжает к вам каждый день
Просто оставлю здесь ваши заказы - пусть они говорят за меня
А классические лоферы точно нужны?
Когда-то лоферы были просто удобной обувью без шнурков-
Сегодня это та деталь, легко меняющая настроение образа
Обращаю ваше внимание на Saint Laurent LE LOAFER SUPPLE in suede:
*не выглядят слишком ‘правильно’
*мягкая замша
*расслабленный силуэт
*ручная прострочка мыска
*фирменная Cassandre
Рекомендую их за мягкость и комфорт ( если давно хотели лоферы — YSL идеальный вариант)
…
‘Почему так дорого?’
‘У других дешевле..’ - Пришел мне такой вопрос на ювелирные украшения
В ювелирке не бывает одинакового украшения с разницей в цене несколько раз
Если Cartier Juste un Clou стоит дешевле, чем у меня, первый вопрос должен быть не ‘где дешевле?’, а ‘что именно там за изделие?’
Цена ювелирного изделия складывается из конкретных вещей:
1. проба и вес золота
2. характеристики бриллиантов (частота, …
Когда будет доставка?
Вы знаете, как это бывает:
вчера +15, а сегодня уже достаешь зимнюю обувь
Материал на фабрике (пока что) есть, но количество ограничено
И часто бывает так, что приходится ждать новую партию, а вместе с ней и отправку
А хочется CHANEL с подиума - я бы выбирала между этими моделями (или купила бы сразу две для разной погоды и настроения)
CHANEL AW26–27 PRE-COLL WOOLLY LAMB - черная, объемная, …
На Chanel слишком высокая цена
До сих пор не утихает хейт на произведения Матье Блази
- уничтожили жесткую структуру
-слишком высокая цена за расслабленность
- стерли ДНК бренда
И несмотря на волну хейта в бутиках солд-аут
Молодое поколение в восторге- Chanel больше не ‘бабушкин’
Так брать или не брать?)
НЕ БРАТЬ:
если вы ищете классику, которая должна держать каркас до 2050 года.
• БРАТЬ: если вы устали от пред…
300.000₽ выгоды на сапоги?
Да, новые Chanel из пре-коллекции осень зима 2026 уже отшивает моя проверенная фабрика
Пара эффектная и точно стоит вашего внимания, но есть несколько тонкостей:
1. визуально это ‘трубы’, и должны сидеть свободно, но в этом сезоне бренд преподнес несколько сюрпризов ✨
1. переход от щиколотки к икре сужен сильнее обычного
( эта пара для узких лодыжек)
2. Мысок стал более аккуратный, но…
Повседневная роскошь*
Или городская сумка, которую рекомендую
Лаконичная Loro Piana Extra Pocket L19 люблю ее и в текстиле, и в кашемире, шелке, коже страуса
Показатель статуса без логомании, с высоком качеством материалов (своей фабрикой loro piana очень горжусь)
Долгое время искала нужное мне качество:
заказывала на тест с разных фабрик, но многие ‘не попадали’ то в материалы, то цвет и геометрию, у некоторых в…
‘Святая троица’ Hermès Birkin 30
У бренда есть так называемая святая троица базовых оттенков:
Black (черный)
Самая ‘классическая классика’ черный с золотом
Gold (кэмэл)
фирменный, благородный коньячно-рыжий оттенок; Старейший цвет модного дома
Étoupe (серо-бежевый) хамелеонит, и при разном освещении будете видеть разный оттенок
У фабрики в наличие заказала gold с золотой фурнитурой в коже togo*
Один из лучших о…
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 237 posts we hold for @made_in_italy_msc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@made_in_italy_msc edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Made in Italy"” (@made_in_italy_msc), 91,302 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/made_in_italy_msc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
