Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 41 days, net +18,815. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 17:42
20,336
-85
15 Sept 2026, 12:22
20,421
-50
13 Sept 2026, 17:59
20,471
-14
11 Sept 2026, 20:56
20,485
-98
9 Sept 2026, 12:57
20,583
-137
6 Sept 2026, 08:20
20,720
-62
4 Sept 2026, 00:19
20,782
-112
2 Sept 2026, 12:54
20,894
-110
1 Sept 2026, 09:56
21,004
-99
31 Aug 2026, 08:44
21,103
-163
30 Aug 2026, 10:12
21,266
-191
29 Aug 2026, 07:34
21,457
-926
28 Aug 2026, 06:34
22,383
-485
27 Aug 2026, 04:42
22,868
-213
26 Aug 2026, 01:32
23,081
-718
25 Aug 2026, 04:54
23,799
-163
24 Aug 2026, 05:43
23,962
-684
22 Aug 2026, 15:17
24,646
-982
21 Aug 2026, 07:27
25,628
-186
20 Aug 2026, 10:13
25,814
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 16s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,082 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
631
58.3%
⚡
253
23.4%
custom 5467891257873289677
111
10.3%
🤯
48
4.44%
👾
39
3.60%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,082 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ДАРИМ 10.000 НА ПОКУПКУ MADFIT 💸
В честь выхода MADFIT на OZON запускаем большой розыгрыш!
Разыгрываем 10 промокодов на покупку MADFIT:
🔥 1 промокод на 10 000 ₽
🔥 9 промокодов по 1 000 ₽
🛒 Промокодом можно оплатить до 99% суммы заказа на Ozon.
Как участвовать? Всё просто:
• подпишись на наш Telegram-канал
• нажми «Участвовать»
Разыгрывать промокоды будем в течение 3 недель. А первых 3 победителей выберем уже в э…
ДЕРЖИТЕСЬ!! MADFIT теперь на OZON 😎
Даже АССОРТИ туда дропнули 😻
В честь такой новости дарим –10% на весь MADFIT на OZON по промокоду MADFIT10 🔥
➡️ ЗАКАЗАТЬ
Промокод: MADFIT10
🚨 ВНИМАНИЕ
На сайте Bombbar –20% на все батончики MADFIT ⚡️
Можно наконец взять не один вкус, а все, на которые давно смотрел. Пока акция на месте — действуй ➡️ Bombbar.ru
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @madfitru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@madfitru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@kokssi_ named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MADFIT” (@madfitru), 20,336 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madfitru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.