Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Очень надо!” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 50 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,004–8,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 21:39
8,015
-12
16 Sept 2026, 20:36
8,027
-7
13 Sept 2026, 00:58
8,034
-6
9 Sept 2026, 08:40
8,040
-8
3 Sept 2026, 20:59
8,048
-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:24
8,050
-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:25
8,052
-6
25 Aug 2026, 19:47
8,058
-4
22 Aug 2026, 13:08
8,062
-3
19 Aug 2026, 11:13
8,065
-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:48
8,066
-6
12 Aug 2026, 18:07
8,072
-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
8,078
-9
6 Aug 2026, 22:53
8,087
-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:04
8,091
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:20
8,091
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,426 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,039
72.9%
🎉
265
18.6%
😢
86
6.03%
🤔
36
2.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,426 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 12 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @madwomen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не так давно знакомый пожаловался на то что, он раньше писал жене фанфики чтоб она на них дрочила. А теперь, она секститься с твитерским Grok и не притрагивается к творчеству муженька.
Спустя пару недель решила протестировать Грока, так ли он хорош. И вот, спустя пол часа и пару оргазмов, дрожащими руками оплатила подписку на два месяца…
Кароч, если вы любите сальные корявенько написаные рассказы в качестве контент…
Когда я работала в офисе большой веселой порно-корпы, меня иногда сдавали в аренду в другие продукты под крылом бренда. И вот однажды меня сдали в штуку, которой пользуются чтобы без палева смотреть всякое в интернете. На мне была задача: написать серию рассылок для юзеров чтобы (я не помню что). И я тогда написала ДИКО угарные рассылки, которые конечно-же никто не апрувнул и я их переписала на скучный и сдержанный л…
Представляете, спустя три веселых года существования на рынке у нас появился сайт))))))))
https://elfie.agency/
балансировали между моим неудержимым желанием ебанутого дизайна и прикладными нуждами. Вышло нарядно, все хвалят.
Вы тоже похвалите пожалуйста.
Это было великое приключение.
За 5 месяцев без банкинга я пообщалась и проходила бесконечные KYC наверное с 30 людьми из условной "серой зоны".
Знаете, вот эти все, Мальтийские банки, приватный фемили офис в Лихтенштейне, офис на Кипре но iban будет немного ебаный, да мы сейчас в Дубае одобрили вам банк за какие то смешные 8% от годового оборота и открытие счета будет стоить сущие гроши 10-20 тысяч долларов. Нет, о…
Но в то же время, адалт это мой панк-рок и я горяче люблю эту индустрию и всех в ней. Но я влетала в нее не из нужды, а очень осознано с желанием делать лютый угар.
Но из того что я увидела за это время, это скорее исключение, к сожалению.
Самое тупое и бесящее осознание последнего времени это то что нельзя совсем все делегировать. Есть ряд неприятных жизненных штук которые будут ну очень "платные" если забить, посыпать деньгами и оставить без присмотра.
Например: психотерапию можно делегировать до определенного момента, пока ты сама не научилась себя урегулировать и закрывать все протечки крыши. Современные методы психотерапии это 1-2 года усиленой …
Ну шо, с днем когда наше предприятие открывает двери для свежей крови. Это уникальная возможность поработать в порно не снимая штанишек.
Вакансия: Менеджер по холодным продажам в Elfie Agency. Она подойдет для тех кто хочет попробовать стартануть в новой для себя нише. Либо для опытного аутричера которому хочется новых угарных свершений. Работа зачастую монотонная, но благлдаря сфере не скучная :)
Кто нахуй:
Elfie …
Подъехало официальное заявление ФАС. Официально запрещается реклама в Телеграм, на Ютубе, в Вотсаппе, в Инстаграме (по поправкам к закону о рекламе от 1 сентября 2025 года). Полная цитата ниже.
Я думаю, рынок будет переходить на новые форматы рекламы: нативную, скрытую и так далее. Без еридов, без меток. Сейчас такое активно происходит в инстаграме. Рандомные штрафы станут нормальной практикой для рекламодателей и б…
8 марта для меня самый важный праздник в году, исключая личные.
Очень трепетно люблю и вдохновляюсь всеми девами, которые меня окружают.
Дамы, мы сила и мощь, которая возрождает этот мир, пока безумные дядьки тащат его во мрак.
Желаю вам простого женского счастья: мирного неба, свободы политических заключённых и чтобы этатистская машина перестала мешать вашему бизнесу и повседневной жизни.
С днём солидарности женщ…
❤258🎉34😢6
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @madwomen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Очень надо жить изо всех сил” (@madwomen), 8,015 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madwomen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.