Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хвост сороки

Channel

Хвост сороки

@magpielongtail

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

462subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001503761572
TypeChannel
Username@magpielongtail
Created24 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/magpielongtail

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4584624605 August 2026 — 458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 458 subscribers13 August 2026 — 459 subscribers19 August 2026 — 460 subscribers11 September 2026 — 462 subscribers5 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 36 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 457–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 08:41462+2
19 Aug 2026, 22:59460+1
13 Aug 2026, 07:49459+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:04458no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:13458first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5377.9%
😁811.8%
😢34.41%
🔥22.94%
👎11.47%
💯11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Reuters: США использовали "почти все" свои высокоточные дальнобойные ракеты во время конфликта с Ираном. Вооруженные силы США использовали в ходе конфликта с Ираном почти все имевшиеся в их распоряжении высокоточные ракеты типов ATACMS и PrSM. Какой из этого можно сделать вывод? В конфликте средней и высокой интенсивности высокоточного оружия много не будет и закончится оно быстро. Из этого следует первый вывод: в

👍4

1 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Потопление БЭКами росатомовского контейнеровоза «Янина» в Черном море неприятно двумя вещами: 1️⃣ Впереди явно маячит тотальная война с тоннажом 2️⃣ Имя владельца судна. Хотя чисто ядерные грузы «Росатом» грузит через Санкт-Петербург, охота может начаться и за судами, которые перевозят именно их, хотя несколько радует, что среди них все же много не под российским флагом

👍2💯1

1 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Как все актуально звучит, как будто вчера посмотрел эфир, тем более «Международное обозрение» как раз по пятницам. Судя по упоминанию 19-го съезда ВЛКСМ, эфир вышел между 21 мая и 10 ноября 1982 года

👍2

31 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC172 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«10 лет НАТО» — швейцарский карикатурный рисунок (май 1959 г.), посвященный десятой годовщине Североатлантического договора. На карикатуре Хрущев смеется над маленьким мальчиком 1949 года, но паникует перед взрослым мужчиной 1959 года. Рисунок немецко-голландского карикатуриста Фрица Берендта для журнала Nebelspalter. Показательно, что к моменту создания НАТО у «мальчика» уже была ядерная бомба, чего не было у «сол

👍4

30 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC154 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Поговорили сегодня о морской войне в Черном море и ВМФ России

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC168 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Советские пропагандисты в 1986 году зрили в корень

👍6

24 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC262 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Современных российских авторов заинтересовала тема постапокалипсиса ака Третьей мировой войны

👍3

23 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC220 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пожурчали (с) о ядерной программе Саудовской Аравии и других потенциальных юниоров

👍2

22 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC218 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это прямо-таки хороший американский юмор

👍2

22 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC185 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Любопытная история с учений «Союз-87». Объединенный Балтийский флот Варшавского договора состоял из объединенных военно-морских сил стран-членов договора: СССР, Польской Народной Республики и Германской Демократической Республики. Военно-морские силы стран-союзников СССР были неотъемлемой и полностью подчиненной частью этих сил — организационно, материально-технического и оперативного — до такой степени, что даже обо

👍3🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC208 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Удивительный европейский феномен конца 19 - первой половины 20 века - предвидение событий будущего, причем в деталях. На ум сходу приходит роман Моргана Робертсона «Тщетность, или гибель «Титана» 1898 года. В ней рассказывается о гигантском пассажирском лайнере «Титан», который считался «непотопляемым», но в апреле (!) столкнулся с айсбергом и затонул. На всех также не хватило мест в шлюпках. Ну и пара иллюстраций Т

👍4

20 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC≈8,990 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хорошо, на самом деле, что России японское ядерное оружие не сильно карты путает. А сыграть в нашу пользу может

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @magpielongtail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хвост сороки” (@magpielongtail), 462 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magpielongtail.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.