Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mahmud Usmon

Channel

Mahmud Usmon

@mahmud_usmon

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,702subscribers

+17,820 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203421177
TypeChannel
Username@mahmud_usmon
DescriptionUstoz Mahmud Usmon Ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi rasmiy sahifalarimizni kuzatib boring: Taplink.cc/mahmud_usmon Savol va takliflar uchun: @mahmudusmon_aloqabot
Created28 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mahmud_usmon

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

55,600 average views per post against 27,702 subscribers — an engagement rate of 200.8%. Across the 15,891 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,005–31,622 subscribers — the middle half sit between 3.17% and 17.0%, with a median of 7.83%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (30 September 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled611,800
Mature posts only200.8% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers27,702 measured 30 October 2026
Cohortb10000 · 15,891 channels · p10 1.15% · p25 3.17% · p50 7.83% · p75 17.0% · p90 31.9%
Position in cohort99.868th percentile · 25.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.105% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageTurkish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 30 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,88227,70218,7927 August 2026 — 9,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,882 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,892 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,894 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,899 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,908 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,914 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,929 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,968 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,991 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,992 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,092 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,123 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,136 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,153 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,171 subscribers24 September 2026 — 10,172 subscribers3 October 2026 — 10,261 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,284 subscribers12 October 2026 — 10,344 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,342 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,348 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,346 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,348 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,347 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,351 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,362 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,363 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,367 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,370 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,979 subscribers27 October 2026 — 24,497 subscribers28 October 2026 — 26,172 subscribers29 October 2026 — 26,582 subscribers30 October 2026 — 27,702 subscribers7 August 202630 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 84 days, net +17,820. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,209–30,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Oct 2026, 09:2627,702+1,120
29 Oct 2026, 06:2826,582+410
28 Oct 2026, 02:4626,172+1,675
27 Oct 2026, 04:3624,497+13,518
26 Oct 2026, 01:1810,979+609
24 Oct 2026, 23:2910,370+3
24 Oct 2026, 00:1010,367+4
22 Oct 2026, 22:2610,363+1
20 Oct 2026, 18:4010,362+11
19 Oct 2026, 15:3110,351+4
18 Oct 2026, 13:4610,347-1
17 Oct 2026, 13:3710,348+2
16 Oct 2026, 11:5710,346-2
15 Oct 2026, 11:2710,348+6
14 Oct 2026, 12:3610,342-2
12 Oct 2026, 21:2910,344+60
8 Oct 2026, 08:5810,284+23
3 Oct 2026, 20:3910,261+89
24 Sept 2026, 22:3910,172+1
18 Sept 2026, 18:1710,171first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 18 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
208.4%
avg views ÷ 27,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
57,700
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held32 (18 July 2025 – 30 October 2026)
Views total692,700
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Oct 2026, 15:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
251
Videos
525
Links
777

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
34m 17s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC≈14,600 viewsread 30 October 2026
Video

#Ekspert_fikri 📌 Sönggi kunlarda ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda keng muhokama qilinayotgan IMAN INVEST loyihasi yuzasidan ekspert fikri. ⚖️ Mazkur vaziyat yuzasidan öz fikr-mulohazalarini moliya bozorini xalqaro huquqiy tartibga soliş böyiça ilmiy darajaga ega mutaxasis, Toşkent davlat yuridik universiteti professori, amaliyotçi advokat va mediator Narziyev Otabek Sa’dieviç bildiradi. 📥Bepul huquqiy yordam oliş uçun Telegra…

28 Oct 2026, 16:19 UTC≈28,700 viewsread 30 October 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfAUi77oslI/?vrfl=b2Q5bG9reWx0bHcx

26 Oct 2026, 05:06 UTC≈68,200 viewsread 30 October 2026

Mana bu xalqning puliga 129 ming AQSh dollariga qimmatbaho avtomobil sotib olib, hech qanday toʻlov qilmay, minib yurgani haqida hujjat. E'tibor bering, bularning barchasini u tan olgan, endi nega tonadi!?

26 Oct 2026, 05:04 UTC≈66,900 viewsread 30 October 2026
Photo

Bu qarorda xalqning millionlab pullari nohaq ishlatib yuborilgani aniqlangani aytilgan va uni Rustam Rahmatov tan olib, imzolagan. Tez orada o'sha suhbatning zoom videosini ham yuboramiz. Bu yerda belgilangan joyi uning o'z imzosi.

26 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC≈65,800 viewsread 30 October 2026

Assalomu alaykum va rohmatulloh! Iman invest kompaniyasi rahbari uyatsizlarcha bizga tuhmat bilan chiqish qilibdi. Bu uning qanchalik umidsiz ahvolga tushib qolganini ko'rsatib beradi. Alloh taolo xalq pulini yegan har qanday kimsani dunyo va oxiratda jazolasin! Qiziqi, xalq pullarini noto'g'ri sarflab yuborganini gapirmay, bizning shaxsimizga tuhmat qilib, jamoatchilikni chalg'itishga urinibdi. Biz siz azizlarga u…

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @mahmud_usmon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Husayn Buxoriy
@husayn_buxoriy · 33,372
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 4 September 2026
Toothbook
@dentistrytextbooks · 20,164
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mahmud Usmon” (@mahmud_usmon), 27,702 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahmud_usmon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.