Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mAia

Channel

mAia

@maia_earlybird

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,636subscribers

+1,165 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003737872791
TypeChannel
Username@maia_earlybird
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 9 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maia_earlybird

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4711,6361,053.56 August 2026 — 471 subscribers6 August 2026 — 471 subscribers13 August 2026 — 475 subscribers20 August 2026 — 499 subscribers28 August 2026 — 502 subscribers4 September 2026 — 857 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,439 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,636 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–1,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:401,636+197
13 Sept 2026, 15:571,439+582
4 Sept 2026, 22:18857+355
28 Aug 2026, 15:53502+3
20 Aug 2026, 18:52499+24
13 Aug 2026, 08:04475+4
6 Aug 2026, 19:02471no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:56471first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6857.1%
👍3226.9%
🤔75.88%
😱65.04%
👏21.68%
🤯21.68%
👎10.84%
🤬10.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maia_earlybird. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Neuromancer Только мы с вами поговорили о книжках. А тут в январе 27-го выйдет первая экранизация Neuromancer. В 1984 году Уильям Гибсон напечатал «Нейроманта» на портативной Hermes — и придумал слово «киберпространство» до того, как впервые вышел в сеть. В Голливуде его объявили «неэкранизируемым», и при этом все эти 40 лет растаскивали на части: «Матрица», «Призрак в доспехах», да вообще эстетика киберпанка целиком…

🔥6👍2

1 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC227 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥7😱6👍1🤔1

26 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC251 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я несколько отвлеклась на развитие и придумывание инсты для этого проекта, не такая это простая работа, знаете ли. Изучаю пока что, но можно уже заглядывать вот сюда https://www.instagram.com/maia.earlybird/. А вот по итогам последних дней меня зацепили две регуляторные инициативы в сфере AI и я прокопалась в них пару часов, чтобы понять, что к чему. Довольно крышесносительно, куда это всё будет двигаться — не ясно, …

🔥5

14 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC297 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не опять, а снова. В принципе, на таких скоростях маркетинг больших ИИ-компаний должен был бы лажать даже чаще. Но тут получилось прямо ух. Anthropic, мягко скажем, перегрел свою модель Fable 5. Сначала было это кокетство про почти неуправляемую мощь: модель настолько сильная, что её будто бы нельзя просто взять и спокойно выпустить в публичный релиз. Суеты напустили столько, что в итоге возбудили американских чиновн…

🔥7

13 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC276 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

AI + нон-профит + заумная инфографика + карта — буквально всё, что я люблю! Помните, Маск пенял в суде Альтману — где, мол, обещанный нон-профит; Амодей ушёл из OpenAI строить свою мессианскую компанию — а на выходе у всех почему-то рекордный бизнес. И вот красивая мысль: может, благо и нон-профит-часть нельзя укладывать в одну компанию? А лучше возложить её на сеть? Ровно так устроен Current AI. Не компания, а партн…

👍6🔥1

2 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC351 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Слушайте, ну ведь правда строят суверенный. А это какой значит? Это значит с дата-центрами, а не просто моделька. Mistral может поднять деньги в контексте существующих европейских ограничений только если возьмёт на себя роль инфраструктурного игрока. На этой неделе французская лаборатория закрыла три хода сразу: агент Vibe в режиме Work берётся за многошаговые задачи — разбирает почту и календарь, делает ресёрч, го…

🤔1

2 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC303 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Призрак коммунизма или... OpenAI предлагает правительству США долю ~5% — примерно $42,6 млрд при нынешней оценке компании. Официальная формулировка красивая: «фонд общественного богатства», граждане получают долю в росте AI. Но можно прочитать и иначе: компании нужно снять политическое давление в Вашингтоне, и акционерный пакет — элегантный способ превратить регулятора в совладельца. И вот по данным FT, чиновники пр…

🤬1

2 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC271 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Anthropic выпустил Claude Science — рабочую среду для учёных, где к каждому графику и расчёту автоматически прикладывается полная история его получения: код, окружение, шаги. Плюс отдельный агент, который перепроверяет цитаты и цифры. Вообще, это мне напоминает качественную журналистику, ну отчасти так меня учили писать в "Коммерсанте" всякие не эстетские заметки. Сказал суждение – подкрепи цитатой. То, что в академ…

🔥3

29 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC289 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🧩 3. Ха! Вор у вора шапку украл! Прочла, подхихикивая, но и офигевая. Значит, дело такое — в Китае процветает серый рынок доступа к Claude: посредники покупают API-ключи за рубежом и перепродают их через прокси-сети по ценам, которые кажутся просто подарком. Скидка до 90% — это не акция лояльности, это бизнес-модель. (можно мне, пожалуйста) Но это не дотация китайским разработчикам. Реальная валюта здесь — ваши пром…

🤔3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maia_earlybird. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mAia” (@maia_earlybird), 1,636 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maia_earlybird.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.