Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ماجرای جنگ؛ رسانه تاریخی سیاسی

Channel

ماجرای جنگ؛ رسانه تاریخی سیاسی

@majaraa_media

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,041subscribers

-795 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002034591479
TypeChannel
Username@majaraa_media
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/majaraa_media

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

26,500 average views per post against 20,041 subscribers — an engagement rate of 132.3%. Across the 5,822 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.81% and 13.1%, with a median of 6.50%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled371,080
Mature posts only132.3% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers20,041 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 5,822 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 2.81% · p50 6.50% · p75 13.1% · p90 21.7%
Position in cohort99.914th percentile · 20.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.164% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

19,87220,83620,3545 August 2026 — 20,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,833 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,800 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,743 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,707 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,652 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,596 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,560 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,530 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,504 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,435 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,382 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,334 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,296 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,265 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,231 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,193 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,158 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,118 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,084 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,061 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,022 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,984 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,949 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,909 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,872 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,216 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,309 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,331 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,286 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,213 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,191 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,134 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,100 subscribers17 September 2026 — 20,041 subscribers20,0415 August 202617 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 43 days, net -795. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,727–20,981 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:5920,041-59
15 Sept 2026, 16:5620,100-34
14 Sept 2026, 03:4020,134-57
12 Sept 2026, 09:0020,191-22
10 Sept 2026, 08:5920,213-73
7 Sept 2026, 05:1620,286-45
4 Sept 2026, 13:0120,331+22
2 Sept 2026, 22:3520,309+93
1 Sept 2026, 21:2420,216+344
31 Aug 2026, 22:0719,872-37
30 Aug 2026, 22:4819,909-40
30 Aug 2026, 01:5619,949-35
28 Aug 2026, 23:4319,984-38
27 Aug 2026, 21:4520,022-39
26 Aug 2026, 18:4620,061-23
25 Aug 2026, 22:1220,084-34
24 Aug 2026, 23:1820,118-40
23 Aug 2026, 10:2220,158-35
21 Aug 2026, 23:2820,193-38
20 Aug 2026, 17:0320,231first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
132.3%
avg views ÷ 20,041 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,500
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.093%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held34 (8 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total371,080
Reactions total345
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6h 10m
Average length
11m 14s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,584 reactions across 34 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,50058.0%
👍64725.0%
👎34913.5%
👏411.59%
🔥341.32%
🙏60.232%
😎40.155%
🥰30.116%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈5,140 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

جزئیات جدید از جلسه تصویب تفاهم‌نامه در شعام و ماجرای «علی‌الاصول»! 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻سرلشکر عبداللهی هم در رأی‌گیری شرکت کرد. 🔻چند نفر مطلع هم در جلسه حضور داشتند. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و باکیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤18👍3

1 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC≈5,150 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

رئیس سازمان برنامه و بودجه: به دیدار آیت‌الله مجتبی خامنه‌ای رفتم 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻انسداد تنگه هرمز، برنامه‌ریزی شهید پاکپور بود. 🔻شهید پاکپور پیش‌بینی کرده بود که جنگ با ترور او شروع می‌شود. 🔻شهید پاکپور برنامه‌ریزی کرده بود که اگر جنگ آغاز شد و او دستوری صادر نکرد، فرماندهان ۲۰ دقیقه بعد شلیک کنند. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و باکیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤23

1 Sept 2026, 13:46 UTC≈4,760 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

سردار رادان در شورای عالی امنیت ملی گفت: «در هفته اول دی‌ماه، یک تیر شلیک نکردیم و اصلا دست نیروهایمان اسلحه ندادیم.» 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و باکیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤17👎10

1 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC≈273,000 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

در هفت روز جنگ، ۱۵ استان را سرکشی کردم 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻قبل از رسیدن به هر استان، به آنها خبر نمی‌دادم تا متوجه شوم واقعاً در استان چه خبر است. 🔻در همان وسط جنگ، با استاندارها درباره پروژه‌های توسعه‌ای استان برنامه‌ریزی می‌کردیم. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤20👍3👎3

1 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC≈13,400 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

رهبر شهید در ۹ فروردین ۱۴۰۴ در جلسه شعام با تبسمی فرمودند: «دشمن اولین کاری که می‌کند، همین جمع را ترور می‌کند!» 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻رهبری به جمع حاضر در جلسه گفتند: «خود را برای شهادت آماده کنید.» 🔻حواستان به دارو، معیشت و قشر ضعیف جامعه باشد. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤22👍2👎2😎1

1 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈13,100 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

آیا جریانی در دولت کودتا انجام داد؟ 👤 پورمحمدی (عضو شعام) در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻کارمندان دولت مگر اسلحه دارند که کودتا کنند؟! 🔻نیروی نظامی که علیه خودش کودتا نمی‌کند. 🔻رهبر شهید فرمود: «این یک شبه‌کودتا بود.» 🔻رئیس‌جمهور در جنگ، جان خود را کف دست گذاشت. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤15👎8👍1

1 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC≈5,110 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

آیا دولت گفته توان ادامه جنگ ندارد؟ 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻دولت فراتر از حد قانونی هم به بودجه نظامی کشور کمک کرد. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

👏12👎6❤5

1 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC≈5,230 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

آیا نظر شورای‌عالی‌امنیت‌ملی به رهبری تحمیل شد؟ 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻رهبری از همه اعضای شعام خواستند جداگانه نظرشان را در مورد تفاهم‌نامه اعلام کنند. من خودم ۱۵صفحه نوشتم. 🔻در برخی موارد بود که رهبری نظر شورای عالی امنیت ملی را رد کرده است. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤17👎4👍1

1 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC≈5,280 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

آیا رئیس سازمان برنامه و بودجه در جنگ از تهران فرار کرد؟! 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻با هر شیوه‌ای بود با سیدمجید موسوی جلسه گذاشته شد. سیدمجید گفت من الان مشکلی ندارم به باقی بخش‌ها رسیدگی کنید. 🔻سیدمجید چند روز قبل از جنگ مشکل مالی داشت و دولت این تامین مالی را انجام داد. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

👍17❤5👎3

1 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈5,370 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

شهادت آقای خامنه‌ای در جلسات شورای عالی امنیت ملی پیش‌بینی می‌شد؟ 👤 پورمحمدی (عضو شعام) در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻آقای خامنه‌ای اسطوره‌ای شهید شدند. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

❤13👎5👍1

1 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC≈14,100 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

شما پیش‌بینی می‌کردید تصمیم دولت باعث ۱۸دی ‌شود؟ 👤 پورمحمدی در بیست‌ودومین قسمت برنامه ماجرای جنگ۲ 🔻دولت باید تصمیم می‌گرفت دارو و کالای اساسی در بازار وجود داشته باشد حتی به قیمت گران‌تر یا اینکه اصلا وجود نداشته باشد؛ دولت توانست این تصمیم را بگیرد. 🔻اگر دولت این تصمیم را نمی‌گرفت، کشور در جنگ ۴۰روزه کشور کالای اساسی نداشت. 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه کامل و با کیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرامدیا تماشا کنید.

👍14👎13❤8

1 Sept 2026, 10:11 UTC≈9,820 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🔴ماجرای جنگ۲ 👤به‌روایت جواد موگویی 🔗قسمت بیست‌ودوم گفت‌وگو با سیدحمید پورمحمدی؛ رئیس سازمان برنامه و بودجه و عضو شورای عالی امنیت ملی 🌐 @majaraa_media نسخه باکیفیت را از سایت و آپارات ماجرا مدیا تماشا کنید

❤25👍6👎6👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @majaraa_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ماجرای جنگ؛ رسانه تاریخی سیاسی” (@majaraa_media), 20,041 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/majaraa_media.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.