Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НЭП 2.0 - Никита и экономическая политика

Channel

НЭП 2.0 - Никита и экономическая политика

@makarov_finance

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,034subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001709595140
TypeChannel
Username@makarov_finance
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/makarov_finance

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0241,0521,0387 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,046 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,035 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,032 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,026 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,024 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,034 subscribers1,0347 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,020–1,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:411,034+10
14 Sept 2026, 04:191,024-2
10 Sept 2026, 11:181,026-6
5 Sept 2026, 02:011,032-3
1 Sept 2026, 09:431,035-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:581,041+1
26 Aug 2026, 13:031,040-4
20 Aug 2026, 08:591,044-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:141,046-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:481,049-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:321,052no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:201,052first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7433.3%
🔥5223.4%
3415.3%
😁198.56%
🎉104.50%
💋73.15%
👎52.25%
🐳41.80%
🥰41.80%
🤔31.35%
👏20.901%
😍20.901%
🥱20.901%
👀10.45%
🗿10.45%
🤝10.45%
🤩10.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @makarov_finance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 September 2025 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,490
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
819
over 15 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJKaJtg119 December 202519 December 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 25 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC202 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/3D9OrfeNKf4 В этом выпуске подкаста НЭП 2.0 — откровенный разговор с Артёмом Тузовым, директором департамента рынка капиталов Первоуральскбанка (Тг-канал: https://telegram.me/+LRYn3gcqwmYzYjY6 Ютуб-канал: https://youtube.com/@artemtuzovinvest?si=krwde6I0ysxHie74) О самом затяжном падении российского фондового рынка за последние годы. Индекс Мосбиржи обваливается 19 недель подряд — что это: проделки

🔥6👎3👏2

Signed Никита Макаров

5 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,060 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/gFZRyormw0s Назар Щетинин — инвестор, предприниматель и автор одного из самых популярных YouTube-каналов о фондовом рынке «Вредный инвестор». В этом большом интервью говорим не только про российский рынок акций, но и о пути самого Назара: от работы в БКС, Финаме и Открытии до создания IT-компании Tesis.io, которую он продал в 2022 году. Разбираем, как формировался его капитал, почему он отказался от

🔥10👎21🤩1

Signed Никита Макаров

14 Jun 2026, 09:44 UTC408 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @finbazarPhoto

НОВЫЙ выпуск уже на площадках БАЗАР 💸 Гость: Никита Макаров - ведущий программы «Рынки» на РБК-ТВ, магистр экономики, финансовый обозреватель Главная тема выпуска: Что на самом деле происходит с экономикой России: почему при низкой безработице и растущих реальных доходах половина отраслей в рецессии, а население не чувствует улучшений и как обычному человеку действовать в этой неопределённости ? 📉 Почему безработи

👍6🔥2🤝1

Signed Никита Макаров

26 May 2026, 14:47 UTC≈2,900 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/IM-YFhvQ2jo?si=J7HzF2z3k-xd3vwl НЕФТЬ ПО $150? Что на самом деле задумал Трамп? В гостях у НЭП 2.0 Вячеслав Мищенко, экс-глава ценового агентства Argus Media в России, СНГ и странах Балтии, автор телеграм канала "Глобальные энергетические рынки" Нефть, ОПЕК+, Трамп, Иран, Ормузский пролив и новая энергетическая война США против Китая — в этом интервью разбираем, как устроен мировой нефтяной рынок

👍10🔥2🥱21

Signed Никита Макаров

28 Mar 2026, 09:12 UTC≈8,360 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/gfDMeU5gDAQ Русский Уоррен Баффет: кровь на рынках | Максим Орловский В гостях подкаста НЭП 2.0 Уоррен Баффет российского фондового рынка – Максим Орловский Поговорили с Максимом о его пути, как стать после музыкального училища трейдером, инвестором и управляющим, как обуздать свои эмоции, о самых больших потерях и самых успешных сделках, каким был рынок в 90е, в 2000е, 2010е и сейчас, во что вклад

👍18🐳2🔥21💋1

Signed Никита Макаров

26 Mar 2026, 12:12 UTC≈2,790 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Coming soon

👍8🔥43🐳2😍2🗿1

Signed Никита Макаров

15 Feb 2026, 16:21 UTC781 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @selfinvestorVideo

⬜️Любители бондов, нас ждет недетский разговор. Завтра в 16:20 встречаемся на телеканале РБК. Ставьте себе напоминание и смотрите «Облигации.Главное» с Никитой Макаровым. А пока голосуйте в опросе ниже 👇🏼 💱 Подписывайтесь на РБК Инвестиции — разбирайтесь в бондах

16😁10👍7🥰4

Signed Никита Макаров

17 Jan 2026, 08:49 UTC≈4,170 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/yNTB9TN8JWI В гостях у подкаста «НЭП 2.0» Андрей Ванин, без своих официальных регалий, как частный опытный инвестор, хорошо известный в индустрии. Контур – это удобная онлайн среда для ведения вашего бизнеса. Я лично пользуюсь сервисами Экстерн – подача деклараций и запрос справок из налоговой, сверка счетов, Диадок – электронный документооборот. Ознакомиться с продуктами можно тут https://kontur.r

👍137💋2

Signed Никита Макаров

26 Dec 2025, 11:24 UTC≈4,030 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В гостях у НЭП 2.0 начальник управления аналитики по рынку ценных бумаг Альфа Банка Борис Красноженов. Мы очень любим Бориса на РБК и ценим его экспертизу в цветных и черных металлах. Я давно вынашивал эту идею и уже с весны 2025 года приглашал Бориса в подкаст - ждал только удобного момента. И текущее ралли в цветных металлах как нельзя кстати: разговор вышел обстоятельный, в тему и, я уверен, поможет многим инвес

🔥11👍1💋1

Signed Никита Макаров

19 Dec 2025, 11:26 UTC≈7,490 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJKaJtg

https://youtu.be/ZRbeFth5Wuk?si=UQrnFXmKJbm3EqRQ Как торговать геполитические новости на фондовом рынке? Гость подкаста НЭП 2.0 - Игорь Шимко, сооснователь аналитической команды NZT Rusfond. Как создать аналитическую команду с нуля, какой для этого нужен бэкграунд, прибыльный ли это бизнес, что это вообще такое NZT Rusfond, зачем аналитику усы, как финансисту помогают проекты в медиа, что такое «пила Шимко», во что

👍3🔥3💋21👀1

Signed Никита Макаров

14 Dec 2025, 10:05 UTC581 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9🔥2

Signed Никита Макаров

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @makarov_finance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЭП 2.0 - Никита и экономическая политика” (@makarov_finance), 1,034 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makarov_finance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.