Channel
@make_senseeya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
771subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002178772831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @make_senseeya |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/make_senseeya |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 771 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 757 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 746 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 745 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 745 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
102 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 66 | 64.7% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 20.6% | |
| 🫡 | 13 | 12.7% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Неделя прошла в ожидании, ничего интересного для себя не увидел. Считаю поход ниже 61 будет отличным подарком к началу осеннего периода. Все следующие апдейты будут с понедельника. Со следующей недели начинаем дни открытых дверей в рамках нашего Bootcamp, где поговорим о торговой стратегии, а так же торговой рутине вместе с TehBeZ. Немного приоткроем занавес нашей работы, так что приходите, будет интересно. Линк …
❤🔥5
С понедельника в целом ничего не изменилось, всё так же жду снижения. Никаких лонгов не открывал, по стакану перекос в сторону асков остаётся. Есть вероятность получить ещё один закол выше в 65.6, без подтверждений позиций не открываю. В качестве ближайшего таргета рассматриваю уровень 63.8.
❤🔥6
Всем привет и хорошей торговой недели. Дам всего несколько скриншотов, цена находится в нисходящей тенденции относительно большей части ключевых TF, потому здесь не спешил бы с лонгами точно. Огромный пул предиктивов расположен ниже текущих цен как раз в отмеченном диапазоне 61.3, потому готов пробовать искать локальные шорт позиции. 68 остатётся ключевым сопротивлением и если не сможем развернуть его, то продолжи…
🫡12
https://www.tradingview.com/x/glsRolND/
❤🔥10
День в карете, два пешком.
❤🔥14
Логику описывал исключительно в чате нашего Bootcamp, испугался что исход будет таким же как и вчера, скрысил.
😁7🗿2
Video, posted without a caption
😁14
Всем привет. Прошлая позиция по бтс ушла в безубыток и я так же в рамках нашего Bootcamp открывал в лайве и получил стоп, в конечном результате остался в небольшом профите. В целом план остаётся тем же что и был, я всё так же смотрю в сторону 67.3, планировал конечно смотреть позиции завтра через тест дневного дисбаланса, но выглядит так, что уйдём без его теста. Возможно сегодня открою чуть позже, если дадим ещё р…
❤🔥4🫡1
Тут срезал 50% и подтянул стоп лосс на уровень безубытка.
❤🔥14
#ENA https://www.tradingview.com/x/U7DcYrWd/ Уже нет.
❤🔥13
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @make_senseeya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Make Sense!?” (@make_senseeya), 771 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/make_senseeya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.