Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Макс Анапский

Channel

Макс Анапский

@maksanapskii

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,771subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058018020
TypeChannel
Username@maksanapskii
Created1 May 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maksanapskii

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,7266,8186,7726 August 2026 — 6,729 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,729 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,726 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,772 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,803 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,818 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,811 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,789 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,786 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,790 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,777 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,780 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,776 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,771 subscribers6,7716 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,712–6,832 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:366,771-5
12 Sept 2026, 23:406,776-4
9 Sept 2026, 04:026,780+3
3 Sept 2026, 23:006,777-13
31 Aug 2026, 10:176,790+4
28 Aug 2026, 00:286,786-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:546,789-22
21 Aug 2026, 15:546,811-7
18 Aug 2026, 18:386,818+15
15 Aug 2026, 19:076,803+31
12 Aug 2026, 18:066,772+29
9 Aug 2026, 14:136,743+17
6 Aug 2026, 17:336,726-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:216,729no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:026,729first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 67 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19m 17s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,441 reactions across 67 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34323.8%
26818.6%
😁26018.0%
🔥1359.37%
💯896.18%
🤬543.75%
🤣493.40%
🙏443.05%
😱372.57%
🤯342.36%
🙈332.29%
😍261.80%
😢191.32%
🐳171.18%
🤝161.11%
🫡70.486%
💔40.278%
30.208%
😨30.208%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,441 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 67 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maksanapskii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,050 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

В Джемете на Джеметинском проезде рядом с причалом сегодня сел на мель прогулочный корабль. На закате другое судно помогло его отбуксировать на глубину, судно освобождено. Похоже, что какая-то ошибка была при заходе на причал. Видео @makovozovy

🙏9👍1

19 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC596 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @resort_patrolVideo

⭐️ Про фигуры в парке Ореховая роща. Всех неравнодушных ждем в субботу на уборку нашего берега от мусора. Присоединяйся к Курортному патрулю Ждем именно тебя! #чистыйберег #курортныйпатруль

👍10😁71🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC919 views70 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Проезд на Тортуге заварили, сделали ров. По идее сейчас там уже ООПТ, проезд транспорта запрещен. Когда-то давно я иногда с удовольствием ездил на Витязевскую косу на машине, переночевать с палаткой. Теперь уже перегибают. Вместо наведения порядка везде запреты. На Утрише не погуляешь без экскурсии, на Витязевскую, Бугазскую косы не проедешь. Чтобы это делать не для галочки, а для сохранения экологии, то можно было б

💯54👍86😁2

19 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC892 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Райская погодка, море +24, супер чистое! Вспомнил недавно, что я неправильный местный, ибо местные(не переехавшие ради моря) не купаются в море, а зря!

👍27🔥6🤬3💯1

19 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC858 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Доброе утро это когда приплыли в дельфинчики. И так каждое утро кто не ленится пораньше вставать.

10🐳5👍2

18 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,000 views47 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Всем спокойной ночи и добрых снов!

😁33🔥6😱6👍2

18 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Масштабный сбой в рунете, сообщают что из-за проблем с электроснабжением на крупном узле связи. Забавно, ровно два года назад, 18 августа 2024-го произошел "сбой" в телеграме, тогда в конце новости я еще спросил о том, что как вы отнесетесь к замедлению телеграма если это произойдет.

🤝5

18 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈3,650 views64 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Побывал я в Ореховой роще - больше ни ногой!

🤣49🙈9😱6

18 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,040 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Обманул вас с тиной, водорослей наоборот стало меньше, чуть поглубже если зайти! Море кристально чистое. Более того, сейчас идёт низовка, апвеллинг, снизу холодное море, а сверху теплое, откуда такое течение не очень понимаю, возможно, это отголосок отжимных ветров предыдущих.

19👍3

18 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,010 views35 reactionsread 20 August 2026

По предложению о переносе дня города с 15 декабря на сентябрь как было ранее, отказали сегодня на общественных обсуждениях. Эти "обсуждения" не предполагают обсуждения, вы заранее отправляете свои предложения, а потом без всяких обсуждений вам просто отказывают. По всем опросам празднование в сентябре выигрывает с подавляющим большинством, в чем принципиальность позиции, и кто продвинул эту" гениальную" идею про 15 д

🤬23💯9👍2😁1

18 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC983 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Море +26, воздух +26, на один градус ошибся, думал +27 будет. Тины немного пока. Режим сауны начался в Анапе, но у берега он не так сильно ощущается.

👍138

17 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC757 views28 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @More_BlagaVideo

Серия видео о том, как мы с дельфинами закат встречали 🌅 Подписаться | More_Blaga

17😍6🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @maksanapskii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МАКОВОЗОВЫ
@makovozovy · 32,499
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
Юрий Озаровский Анапа Витязево Джемете
@MoreOz · 46,913
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
🇷🇺 ЧП Анапа
@pva_chp · 94,398
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 16 August 2026
🇷🇺ПВА
@pva_anapa · 95,116
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 16 August 2026
Заметки Южанина. Кокорин Роман.
@kokorin_roman · 28,929
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Новости Краснодара | Сочи Анапа
@krasnodar1 · 31,990
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
Юг Край - отдых на юге. Краснодар Крым Кавказ
@yugkray · 22,541
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
Новости Краснодара и края |ЮГ-24
@yug_24_ru · 142,096
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Макс Анапский” (@maksanapskii), 6,771 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maksanapskii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.