Channel
@maksvashin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,106subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001254351416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maksvashin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maksvashin |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 3,106 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 3,101 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 3,102 | +8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 3,094 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 3,086 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 3,083 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 3,078 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 3,082 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 3,083 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 3,084 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 3,087 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 3,087 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 60 | 62.5% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 16.7% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 12.5% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
До и через 6️⃣ месяцев после редукционной маммопластики 🔝 Почему некоторые женщины не сразу делают маммопластику? Потому что большой размер молочных желез предполагает, что птоз появился достаточно рано - обычно еще в подростковом возрасте. И человек уже частично адаптировался к такому внешнему виду груди 🤷🏼♂️ Это с одной стороны, а с другой - внутри всегда живет чувство, что так не должно быть, что идеальная фиг…
🔥3👍2
До и через 3️⃣ месяца после реэндопротезирования круглыми имплантами, объем 295 мл и мастопексии 🔝 Когда-то импланты старого поколения придется поменять на новые. У данной пациентки прошло 22 года после первой маммопластики, когда стало очевидным, что придется делать реэндопротезирование. Как вы можете заметить, грудь абсолютно потеряла форму, также был диагностирован разрыв импланта, капсулярная контрактура - прав…
🔥5👍1👏1😍1
До и через 1️⃣ месяц после верхней и нижней трансконъюнктивальной блефаропластики 🔝 Прошел всего месяц после блефаропластики, а перемены уже очевидные. Это тот эффект, который я обычно называю "вроде ничего не произошло, просто съездила в отпуск и как следует выспалась" 😌 В данном случае хочу заметить, что мы провели также операцию на верхнем веке, хотя никаких серьезных жалоб не было. Но это было сделано в, скаже…
🔥7👍1👏1😍1
🔝4 месяца после операции 🔘🔘Круглые импланты, объем 295 мл ▪️Установка dual plane (под мышцу и под железу) ▪️Мастопексия
🔥4👏1
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
До и через 1️⃣ год после увеличения молочных желез круглыми имплантами, объем 240 мл 🔝 Многие считают, что маммопластику нужно отодвинуть на более поздний возраст, потому что операцию стоит проводить, когда уже условно "все плохо".. С одной стороны я с этим согласен, а с другой стороны - смотря какие обстоятельства! Потому что если пациент уже в позднем возрасте осознал, что ему нужны внешние изменения, то это впо…
🔥8👍2👏1😍1
Channel photo updated
Channel photo removed
До и через 5️⃣ месяцев после увеличения молочных желез круглыми имплантами, объем 275 мл 🔝 Моя главная задача, когда я вижу красивую грудь - не испортить то, что есть, а улучшить, деликатно устранив небольшие недоточеты.. В данном случае дело не столько в объеме, сколько в улучшении формы - она должна была стать более четкой и округлой. Но несмотря на то, что были нюансы, над которыми мы работали, я всегда стараюс…
🔥5👍1
1 сутки после операции 🔝
😍8🔥5
https://t.me/ama_surgery
👍4🔥3
🔝1 год после операции 🔘🔘Круглые импланты, объем 350 и 375 мл ▪️Установка dual plane (под мышцу и под железу)
🔥7👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @maksvashin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вашин Максим Петрович” (@maksvashin), 3,106 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maksvashin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.