Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Травма отвержения

Channel

Травма отвержения

@malashinapsi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

164subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882468191
TypeChannel
Username@malashinapsi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/malashinapsi

Growth

1641681667 August 2026 — 166 subscribers8 August 2026 — 166 subscribers24 August 2026 — 168 subscribers31 August 2026 — 166 subscribers9 September 2026 — 164 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:57164-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:55166-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:47168+2
8 Aug 2026, 16:01166no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:55166first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2552.1%
🔥1225.0%
custom 540888090689722574948.33%
❤‍🔥48.33%
🥰24.17%
😍12.08%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026

Как ценно когда тебя рекомендуют такие масштабные люди 🤍Благодарю за доверие 🤍

7 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC12 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psy_superchat

Самое ценное, что у нас есть, — это люди. И мне в этом очень повезло. Я правда богата. Вокруг меня собрались потрясающие люди: сильные, профессиональные и с большим сердцем. А еще я не люблю держать хорошее при себе. Почти каждый день мне пишут в личные сообщения с просьбой порекомендовать психолога. И я всегда делаю это с большим удовольствием. Поэтому сегодня хочу поделиться одной из таких рекомендаций и здесь.

4

7 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC25 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Боже как страшно ! Я сегодня думала о том, как я начала вести этот блог. И я так боялась)) Я просто сидела и смотрела на пустой экран и боялась. Что те кто будет читать пост скажут, что я пишу ерунду.Скажут что я плохой психолог и что мне самой нужна помощь. И я перечитывала каждый пост по десять раз. Кучу раз редактировала, потому что мне казалось, что если я напишу что-то не так, кто-то подумает что я плохая😀А п

❤‍🔥4custom 54088809068972257491

5 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026

МАК-карты 🔥 Устали от мыслемешалки в голове? Один и тот же вопрос крутится по кругу, а ответа нет? Попробуйте поговорить со своим подсознанием. Без слов, без долгих размышлений. Через образы. Метафорические ассоциативные карты (МАК) — это не гадание. И не карты судьбы. Это просто инструмент, который помогает: ✨ заглянуть туда, где ум уже зашёл в тупик ✨ увидеть то, что вы и так знаете, но не решаетесь признаться

4 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC39 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Куда ты лезешь?» У меня внутри живёт маленький критик,который комментирует всё, что я делаю. Когда я хочу написать пост, он говорит: «Кому это нужно? Ты пишешь ерунду. Все увидят, что ты ничего не понимаешь». Когда я хочу провести вебинар, он шепчет: «Ты не готова. Ты недостаточно знаешь. Ты опозоришься». Когда я радуюсь, он добавляет: «Не радуйся раньше времени. Сейчас всё испортится». Когда я ошибаюсь, он кри

8

2 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какое платье нравится больше ?

  1. 157%
  2. 236%
  3. 314%
  4. 421%
  5. 57%
  6. 614%
  7. 736%
  8. 821%

The shares total 206%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC44 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Выбираем платье на свадьбу 😃 Какой вариант нравится больше ?

1 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC46 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Готовлю для вас два новых поста на тему моего осуждения, как у меня проявлялся страх осуждения, что я делала)Это про блог и не только🙌 И второй пост на тему того как мне жаль что все так в мире сейчас, и как я в очередной раз убеждаюсь в важности выбранной профессий🙏 Интересно вам такое ?

🔥6custom 54088809068972257493

29 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

МАК-карты 🔥 Устали от мыслемешалки в голове? Один и тот же вопрос крутится по кругу, а ответа нет? Попробуйте поговорить со своим подсознанием. Без слов, без долгих размышлений. Через образы. Метафорические ассоциативные карты (МАК) — это не гадание. И не карты судьбы. Это просто инструмент, который помогает: ✨ заглянуть туда, где ум уже зашёл в тупик ✨ увидеть то, что вы и так знаете, но не решаетесь признаться

3

27 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3😍1

25 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC58 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3🔥3🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @malashinapsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Какое платье нравится больше ?

  1. 157%
  2. 236%
  3. 314%
  4. 421%
  5. 57%
  6. 614%
  7. 736%
  8. 821%

The shares total 206%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Травма отвержения” (@malashinapsi), 164 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malashinapsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.