Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дневник мусульманина

Channel

Дневник мусульманина

@mamedblog

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,650subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001557857859
TypeChannel
Username@mamedblog
Created2 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mamedblog

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,6508,6818,665.56 August 2026 — 8,681 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,681 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,670 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,676 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,668 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,664 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,656 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,653 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,650 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,655 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,662 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,663 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,650 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 50 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,645–8,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:228,650-13
17 Sept 2026, 04:178,663+1
13 Sept 2026, 03:578,662+7
9 Sept 2026, 07:588,655+5
28 Aug 2026, 13:588,650-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:558,653-3
22 Aug 2026, 19:368,656-8
19 Aug 2026, 06:458,664-4
16 Aug 2026, 05:588,668-8
12 Aug 2026, 23:038,676+6
9 Aug 2026, 20:528,670-11
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,681no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:448,681first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,065 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤61858.0%
👍29027.2%
🔥14513.6%
😁90.845%
👎30.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,870 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Про воспитание детей классное видео https://youtu.be/w37IukAz7fE?si=bMWH8paFz3m-VhNQ

❤20👍10

30 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC≈4,270 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«Я верю в Коран, но не верю в Хадисы» Последнее время появилось очень много людей, которые говорят эту страшную фразу. На самом деле они не верят в Коран, они его не читают, не изучают и не живут по нему. Они враги Корана и сунны, просто не понимают этого. Они не могут просто уничтожить Коран, но уничтожив Сунну - смогут добиться этого. Да и название этой секты «Кораниты» им не подходит, потому что они не имеют ни…

❤33👍8

11 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC≈5,370 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Можно ли в шутку принять ислам? А можно ли не верить в хадисы, но верить в Коран? А вы знали что иудеи говорят ля иляхя иль Аллах – значит они мусульмане? В этом видео я рассказал об условиях принятия шахады – в каких случаях он недействителен и как его нужно правильно понимать ⤵️ https://youtu.be/iFfJdnsYWVU?si=5e5IBvdfDU3F6CKq

🔥13❤9👍5

8 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC≈3,460 views137 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я смотрю на то, как летит моё время, и мне хочется себя оплакивать. Как много ошибок, как много грехов, как много проблем создано собственноручно мною на мою же голову Неужели мы не одумаемся? Когда же мы проснёмся? Сколько ещё мы собираемся грешить и ослушаться нашего Господа? Когда мы станем верующими? Нам нужно себя оплакивать

❤94👍33🔥9👎1

7 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC≈4,890 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ПАРАДОКС 12:00 Язычники времён Пророка мир ему и благословение верили в Аллаха!!! Почему же они тогда воевали с Пророком? Потому что они понимали ШАХАДУ лучше большинства мусульман сегодня Что вы знаете о ля иляхя ильАллах? https://youtu.be/dSNZCdRqEM0?si=0DLRxG13X2nSUqwd

❤24👍8👎2😁2

6 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC≈4,460 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Есть один хадис его называют “МАТЬ СУННЫ» Как вы думаете почему? Потому что в ней есть все базовые основы нашей веры !!! Подробнее рассказал в этом видео ⤵️ Зашёл человек в белоснежной одежде без следов пути - ангел Джибриль https://youtu.be/2uvvqWWni4w

❤31🔥3👍2😁1

1 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC≈5,190 views73 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Рай без намаза – реально? Отправьте это всем своим родственникам, которые бьют в грудь, свидетельствуя о своей вере, но оставили намазы и другие поклонения Вот полное видео обязательно посмотрите его ⤵️ Зашёл человек в белоснежной одежде без следов пути - ангел Джибриль https://youtu.be/2uvvqWWni4w

❤56👍16😁1

30 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC≈4,830 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ты можешь молиться хоть 100 лет, но если ты не соблюдаешь эти два условия – все это будет впустую Почему Аллах не принимает дела? Два условия, без которых всё впустую https://youtu.be/AM16nKlKGBs

❤29👍2🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC≈5,750 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почему так много течений хотя все говорят «Коран и сунна»? Где разделительная черта и как нам ориентироваться, чтобы не заблудиться? Ответ тут ⤵️ Это слово стирают из ислама — а оно решает всё https://youtu.be/VGR9n1xZbfs

❤20👍6🔥5

20 Jun 2026, 10:46 UTC≈6,010 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026

1000 течений в исламе в то время как мы могли бы объединиться на истине без споров и разногласий https://youtu.be/GjQkvq44C50?si=s77tJZGpFB5pyhCP

🔥28👍6❤3

16 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC≈7,580 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Что бы вы посоветовали своему молодому сыну? Что бы посоветовали себе молодому? Молодежи? Я собрал 10 базовых советов, которые помогут молодому человеку найти себя, не потеряв «себя» В 12:00 премьера Делайте обязательно репосты в группах чатах и тд https://youtu.be/z0dvwVlHX7U?si=xEv7U99Z9uoWLXzd

👍21🔥9❤8

13 Jun 2026, 11:38 UTC≈6,980 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Мой старый аккаунт заблокировали - я завёл новый Кто пользуется Instagram и хочет следить за коротким контентом вот ссылка 👇🏼 https://www.instagram.com/mamedblogofficial Подписка

👍22

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mamedblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Мохамад Хамед
@doctorMohamadhamed · 28,358
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Юсуф Абу Закария
@yusufabuzakariya · 24,133
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Ruslan Kurbanov
@ruslankurbanovTG · 26,702
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневник мусульманина” (@mamedblog), 8,650 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamedblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.