Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 88 days, net -1,320. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,483–9,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 21:39
7,681
-14
31 Oct 2026, 12:46
7,695
-19
28 Oct 2026, 06:05
7,714
-16
24 Oct 2026, 23:05
7,730
-25
21 Oct 2026, 22:27
7,755
-22
18 Oct 2026, 21:00
7,777
-26
15 Oct 2026, 16:06
7,803
-10
12 Oct 2026, 16:59
7,813
-35
5 Oct 2026, 20:54
7,848
-84
28 Sept 2026, 00:56
7,932
-323
18 Sept 2026, 16:20
8,255
-49
14 Sept 2026, 00:18
8,304
-552
10 Sept 2026, 02:20
8,856
-30
4 Sept 2026, 20:58
8,886
-18
1 Sept 2026, 08:43
8,904
-37
28 Aug 2026, 22:44
8,941
-12
26 Aug 2026, 09:18
8,953
-1
23 Aug 2026, 08:06
8,954
-9
19 Aug 2026, 12:14
8,963
-15
16 Aug 2026, 22:24
8,978
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.07%
avg views ÷ 7,681 subscribers
Avg views / post
620
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
31 (8 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
8,676
Reactions total
171
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 00:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
877
Videos
26
Links
640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
395 reactions across 31 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
201
50.9%
🔥
74
18.7%
👍
71
18.0%
🙏
18
4.56%
😁
8
2.03%
✍
5
1.27%
👏
4
1.01%
🤝
4
1.01%
🤩
4
1.01%
🤗
3
0.759%
🥰
2
0.506%
🎉
1
0.253%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
9.68%
3 of 31 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
903
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
814
over 28 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
5jtCeReNx12oajzfVtbb7EW
1
15 July 2026
15 July 2026
5jtCeReNx12oak2qzSvtMUb
1
24 October 2026
24 October 2026
CQH36pWzJqMVHkTNq7pyUeYDrXeRDm1r8CRTDUtmgQMPbi
1
30 July 2026
30 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Заметки консультанта: про болтающиеся ноги и один стульчик
Приходит ко мне мама почти годовалого малыша. Запрос: «Ничего не ест. Отказывается от всего, кроме макарон. Что делать?»
Начинаем разбираться. Ребёнок здоров, вес в норме, пищевой интерес был. Но где-то месяц назад начались отказы. Мама перепробовала всё: новые рецепты, красивые тарелки, уговоры, мультики (не одобряем, но и не осуждаем). Ничего не работало.…
Вода, соки, соль, сахар, мёд
Давайте поговорим о том, что попадает в тарелку и чашку к малышу помимо основной еды. Вода, соки, соль, сахар, мёд — вокруг этих продуктов столько мифов и противоречий, что немудрено запутаться. Одни говорят «можно всё», другие — «до трёх лет ничего». Истина, как всегда, где-то посередине. Давайте разложим по полочкам.
🔘 Начнём с воды — когда её предлагать и сколько
🔘 Соки — нужны ли о…
Битва мнений: докармливать vs недокармливать
Сегодня в нашей рубрике — спор, который, кажется, никогда не закончится. И который я слышу почти на каждой консультации.
Ситуация обычная: малыш поел кусочки, съел немного, но кажется, что он не наелся. Или отказался от еды через пять минут. Или просто встал из-за стола. И тут у мамы возникает вопрос: стоит ли докармливать?
Лагерь первый: «Конечно, докармливать»
Аргумент…
😄🥲🙂😇😍😀🥲😍🥹
У нас для вас важные новости! 📣
Из-за участившихся технических сложностей и замедлений в работе Telegram и риска полной блокировки, мы открыли официальное сообщество ВКонтакте!
Почему это здорово? Теперь у нас будет:
🔔 Стабильность: Чтобы наши материалы всегда были у вас под рукой, даже если где-то что-то «легло».
💬 Удобные чаты: Мы создали уютный бесплатный чат поддержки прямо внутри сообщества, где мо…
Еда руками после года: почему это не «отставание»
Пост для вас подготовила консультант по комплексному уходу за детьми Анна Николаева
«Ему уже год и два, а он всё ещё хватает всё руками. Когда уже научится есть ложкой?»
Этот вопрос я слышу часто. И каждый раз вижу за ним тревогу: «Мы что-то упустили? Он отстаёт? Пора как-то приучать?»
Давайте разберёмся спокойно.
Рука — это первый инструмент, которым ребёнок нач…
Игрушечный вопрос 🥕
На прошлой неделе я рассказывала, как игра с «продуктами» помогает поддерживать пищевой интерес — особенно когда у малыша период «ничего не хочу» или просел аппетит после болезни.
И обещала показать, что мне самой нравится.
При составлении подборки я смотрела на материал — чтобы был безопасный, без запаха, без острых краёв. На то, как продумана сама игрушка: «режется» ли она, держится ли на лип…
Мы хотим продолжить рассказывать вам о себе и нашем пути. Хотим лишний раз напомнить о том, что прикорм бывает разный и вовсе не всегда похож на идеальную картинку из нельзяграма.
Первой свою историю от первого лица расскажет Анна Николаева
Меня зовут Анна, моей дочери Алисе почти 4,5 года, давайте знакомиться! А может кто-то меня и помнит как Лёлю? 😉
Мой путь в самоприкорме неразрывно связан с этим каналом, которы…
Прикорм и ГВ/СВ. Особые случаи
Дорогие мамы, этот пост для тех, кто кормит грудью или смесью и переживает: а как же всё это совмещать? Не помешает ли прикорм кормлению? Не придётся ли выбирать?
Спокойно. Ничего выбирать не нужно. ГВ и прикорм — не конкуренты, а партнёры. Они прекрасно сосуществуют, если знать несколько нюансов.
🔘 Начнём с главного — как выстроить баланс между прикормом и ГВ или смесью
🔘 Если ваш …
Лайфхак по питанию: про еду и ощущения 🖐
Сегодня — про то, что выходит за рамки «полезно или вредно».
Еда — это сенсорный опыт
Мамы часто ругают детей, когда те размазывают пищу по столу, мнут хлеб или перебирают макароны. А я предлагаю: не ругайте. Это не вредность. Это исследование.
Ребёнок до 3-х лет познаёт мир через тактильные ощущения. Когда он мнёт, трогает, размазывает — он изучает текстуру, температуру, ф…
📋 Чек-лист настроения: когда кажется, что сил больше нет
Сегодня с вами психолог проекта Анастасия Васина.
Иногда мы просыпаемся уже уставшими. Когда ночь была беспокойной, когда день начинается с капризов, когда внутри — тревога или опустошение.
В такие моменты мы чаще всего говорим себе: «Я должна держаться», «Всё нормально», «У других мам тоже сложно, но они справляются».
А если не держаться? Если разрешить се…
Как знакомить малыша с едой вне тарелки, а главное — зачем?
Пост для вас подготовила консультант по прикорму и питанию детей первых лет жизни Мария Золочевская
Мамы часто думают, что пищевой интерес — это про «хочу есть». Ну то есть пришло время, поставили тарелку, ребёнок заинтересовался. Но на самом деле всё начинается гораздо раньше. И совсем не за столом.
Ребёнок знакомится с едой задолго до первого кусочка. О…
❤11👍3🔥3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @mamochkavteme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @mamochkavteme as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вкусные тарелочки. Детские рецепты @vkysnayatarelochka · 25,421 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
DOC.POPOVKIN’ы @docpopovkina · 90,862 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
nataly_frol @nataly_frol · 20,148 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 September 2026
Доктор Владислав Ченчак @glavmamarf · 85,886 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
Новокриницкие/развитие 0-12 мес @massagist_novokrinitskii · 87,884 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
Рediatric family | Громовы @pediatricfamily · 38,059 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Polina for baby @polinaforbaby · 48,582 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Доктор Молодой @doctor_dmolodoy · 61,477 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
DocDeti & DocMed @docdeti_docmed · 62,965 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“САМОПРИКОРМЩИКИ” (@mamochkavteme), 7,681 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamochkavteme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.