Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МАМР | Академия медицинской реабилитации

Channel

МАМР | Академия медицинской реабилитации

@mamrkurs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,623subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735574980
TypeChannel
Username@mamrkurs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mamrkurs

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,6239,6859,6547 August 2026 — 9,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,681 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,679 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,672 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,664 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,660 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,656 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,655 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,651 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,644 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,638 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,631 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,629 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,623 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,614–9,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:219,623-6
14 Sept 2026, 07:169,629-2
10 Sept 2026, 21:419,631-7
5 Sept 2026, 18:419,638-6
1 Sept 2026, 18:469,644-7
29 Aug 2026, 20:099,651-4
26 Aug 2026, 11:489,655-1
23 Aug 2026, 13:259,656-4
20 Aug 2026, 05:139,660-4
16 Aug 2026, 18:589,664-8
13 Aug 2026, 15:489,672-7
10 Aug 2026, 12:449,679-2
7 Aug 2026, 20:529,681-4
7 Aug 2026, 05:459,685first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 12s
Average length
2m 48s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 28 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5743.2%
👍3325.0%
🔥3325.0%
🙏43.03%
🤔21.52%
🤩21.52%
👌10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
71.0%
22 of 31 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
22
posts carrying an erid · 22 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
695
over 22 measured posts
Median views · rest
555
over 9 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VfnxvPhsm5122 July 202622 July 2026
2VfnxvPib1M18 August 20268 August 2026
2VfnxvhW6uZ110 August 202610 August 2026
2Vfnxvitha311 August 20261 August 2026
2VfnxwDGXWb117 July 202617 July 2026
2VfnxwTsxyh114 July 202614 July 2026
2VfnxwYHxkT15 August 20265 August 2026
2VfnxwctHjR123 July 202623 July 2026
2VfnxwoErn7121 July 202621 July 2026
2VfnxwshCPV17 August 20267 August 2026
2Vfnxwx6pF5111 August 202611 August 2026
2Vfnxx3z1wZ116 July 202616 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 10 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC457 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Рабочая зона — область черепа. Изменения видим на уровне стоп 🦶 🤍Не самый очевидный клинический кейс из практики Екатерины Дьяковой. На фотографиях «до» заметна асимметрия положения нижних конечностей: стопы находятся на разном уровне и визуально выглядят разными по длине. После инструментальной работы их положение стало более симметричным. ВАЖНО: кости стопы не стали длиннее или короче. Изменились положение конеч

🔥4👍32

20 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC479 viewsread 29 August 2026

Коллеги, запись вчерашнего эфира с Екатериной Дьяковой уже доступна в нашем закрытом сообществе. Тема: «Почему работа там, где болит, не всегда работает? Как искать причину нарушения и выбирать стратегию реабилитации, а не просто воздействовать на симптом» Если пропустили, смотрите по ссылке прямо сейчас 🤍https://mamrkurs.ru/club_mamr?utm_source=TG&utm_medium=PostTG&utm_content=klub_efir190826

20 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC467 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

Медицинский нож сам по себе не меняет движение пациента. ✅Результат появляется, когда специалист понимает, с какой структурой работает, почему выбирает конкретное воздействие и как оценить его эффективность. Именно этому посвящён курс «Функциональные инструментальные техники: Ножи». 🤍Программу ведёт Екатерина Валерьевна Дьякова: невролог, врач ЛФК и спортивной медицины, заместитель главного врача ЦМР «Экзарта». За

19 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC491 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🔪 До / после — смотрите на руки Ровно об этом кейсе мы говорили сегодня на эфире — здесь видно без слов. Разбираем такие случаи на курсе «Ножи: функциональные инструментальные техники» с Екатериной Дьяковой. Офлайн-поток стартует 24–28 августа. 👉 Подробности и запись: https://academy.mamrkurs.ru/knives#pay

🔥42

18 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC592 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Результат работы оценивается не по тому, насколько интенсивным было воздействие, а по тому, как изменилось движение. 🖇️ИТАК: на фото — случай из практики Екатерины Валерьевны Дьяковой. У пациентки было ограничено разгибание в локтевом суставе. В области локтя также виден послеоперационный рубец, который мог влиять на подвижность окружающих тканей. После работы медицинскими ножами амплитуда разгибания увеличилась: и

👍32

17 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC555 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги! Важная новость! 🗓19 августа в 19:00 состоится прямой эфир с Екатериной Дьяковой. 🫐Тема эфира: «Почему работа там, где болит, не всегда работает?» Поговорим о том, как переходить от симптома к клинической гипотезе и осознанно выбирать воздействие. Пациент жалуется на шею, и мы работаем с шеей. Болит плечо, воздействуем на плечо. Ограничено движение, растягиваем то, что кажется напряжённым. Иногда такой п

1

14 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC668 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

«Я в диком восторге от полученных знаний, вдохновения и уже получила первые результаты». Анжела Александровна, благодарим Вас за искренние слова и высокую оценку обучения у Екатерины Валерьевны Дьяковой. 🔗Коллеги, очень вовремя Анжела Александровна (инструктор ЛФК) записала этот отзыв. Он подтверждает: инструментальные техники не заменяют знания и опыт специалиста, а расширяют его возможности и помогают качественне

🔥5👍3

13 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC762 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Благодарим вас за честные ответы в опросе. Они показали, что работа с рубцами остаётся непростой темой даже для практикующих специалистов. Это абсолютно нормально ✅ На самом деле, РУБЕЦ — это не только видимый след на коже, потому что изменения могут затрагивать разные слои тканей, влиять на их подвижность, чувствительность, амплитуду движений и формирование компенсаторных паттернов. Ручные техники, массаж и ЛФК м

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC565 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Коллеги, как вы обычно работаете с рубцами? 🤔

  1. Стандартный массаж + ЛФК (голыми руками)27%
  2. Включаю лимфодренаж и мануальную терапию38%
  3. Честно? Не беру таких пациентов15%
  4. Есть специальные инструменты (ножи, скребки и т.д.)65%
  5. Не уверен (а), как вообще к ним подходить0%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC694 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vfnxwx6pF5Photo

🫐Почему после правильной коррекции мышца иногда становится слабее? Представьте: до коррекции мышца показывала слабость. Вы провели воздействие, и при повторном тестировании она стала ещё слабее. 🫐Ошибка? 🫐Не обязательно. Иногда снижение силы после коррекции — важный диагностический результат. 👉🏻 Оно может показывать, что первоначально мышца работала как компенсатор, а после изменения условий нервная система перест

2👍1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC599 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxvhW6uZPhoto

🫐Почему функциональное мышечное тестирование у одних специалистов становится инструментом диагностики, а у других просто проверкой силы? Потому что опытный специалист оценивает не только результат теста, а понимает, почему мышца ведёт себя именно так. 🫐Слабость может быть следствием боли, компенсации, нарушения биомеханики или защитной реакции. 🫐Пока не найдена причина, работать приходится лишь с последствиями. Им

1👍1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC658 views7 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxvPib1MPhoto

🫐Самая дорогая ошибка при работе инструментальными техниками: думать, что результат создаёт инструмент. Нет. 👉🏻 Результат создаёт специалист. Один и тот же инструмент в руках разных реабилитологов может дать совершенно разный эффект. 🫐Один работает с местом боли и получает кратковременное облегчение. 🫐Другой находит структуру, которая действительно ограничивает движение, и меняет функцию. Поэтому опытные специали

3👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @mamrkurs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Коллеги, как вы обычно работаете с рубцами? 🤔

  1. Стандартный массаж + ЛФК (голыми руками)27%
  2. Включаю лимфодренаж и мануальную терапию38%
  3. Честно? Не беру таких пациентов15%
  4. Есть специальные инструменты (ножи, скребки и т.д.)65%
  5. Не уверен (а), как вообще к ним подходить0%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Епифанов | Невролог| Все о позвоночнике
@epifanovnews · 49,144
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Алесь Улищенко | Врач-остеопат, канд. мед. наук | Автор фейспластики
@dr_ales · 465,399
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МАМР | Академия медицинской реабилитации” (@mamrkurs), 9,623 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamrkurs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.