Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Manko

Channel

Manko

@mankoexpert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

163subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609418834
TypeChannel
Username@mankoexpert
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mankoexpert

Growth

1631651648 August 2026 — 165 subscribers8 August 2026 — 165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 164 subscribers31 August 2026 — 163 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 11:35163-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:57164-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:16165no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:15165first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3928.5%
🔥3324.1%
👍1712.4%
🙈96.57%
😁75.11%
🤝75.11%
🤣75.11%
💯53.65%
🤯32.19%
😈21.46%
😢21.46%
😭21.46%
🤔21.46%
🤬21.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Казалось бы, уже было, и не раз, но, видимо, проблема была не решена) а у меня как раз 18 августа в кассации спор с этим компонентом))

2

Signed Elena Manko

7 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @orpauradio

ВС РФ указал на недопустимость формального распределения процентного вознаграждения между управляющими пропорционально периодам их полномочий (Определение от 15.05.2026 по делу №А40-221705/2015) https://zakon.ru/blog/2026/08/06/vs_rf_ukazal_na_nedopustimost_formalnogo_raspredeleniya_procentnogo_voznagrazhdeniya_mezhdu_upravlya

1

Signed Elena Manko

5 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/84c54e4a-3c93-46fb-9d0c-a0313238ed4f/bd20201e-b6f0-4c67-9151-862445592acf/A40-40700-2024_20260803_Opredelenie.pdf?isAddStamp=True —— по делу Ратникова (это там, где кредитор просудил свои текущие после распределения и завершения процедуры и пошел их взыскивать как убытки с управляющего) - отказано ВС в передаче жалобы. Аж на две страницы отказ)) Это ура, там были прям хорошие вывод

🔥6🤝2

Signed Elena Manko

3 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @probankrotstvoruPhoto

КС: общие долги супругов учитываются при разделе имущества Вадим Коновалов обратился в Конституционный суд с жалобой на нарушение его прав при разделе общего имущества супругов и долговых обязательств. Суды признали за супругами равные доли в праве собственности на заложенное недвижимое имущество, но отказали в признании кредитных обязательств общими долгами супругов и в разделе этих обязательств. Суды отметили, что

2

Signed Elena Manko

7 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC213 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/3a1c823b-a95c-4f9e-90dc-bde95c354bd6/c3bdae40-4d5e-46ce-98d4-38b851631d80/A40-225487-2024_20260703_Opredelenie.pdf?isAddStamp=True —- по спору НЦРБ с Сапфиром оставили в силе 9ААС с таким вот выводом: Применительно к бездействию, выраженному в неоспаривании подозрительных сделок должника, определение момента наступления страхового случая не может быть сведено к какому-либо од

3🤬2

Signed Elena Manko

1 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC246 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всё-таки наши арбитражники - смертнички. Я тут просто подряд сходила на дела по убыткам: 1) за то, что выплатил с нарушением очередности 2) за то, что не выплачивал, пока с очередностью реестра не разберётся после предыдущего коллеги)) Это называется "оба хуже"))

💯5🔥2😈2😭2

Signed Elena Manko

17 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC337 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В коридоре перед заседанием можно услышать немало интересного и полезного) Например, сегодня я услышала, что в АСгМ устранили отдел, который занимался сканированием документов, поступивших в суд через канцелярию. Соответственно, теперь если запрашиваешь документы на ознакомление онлайн, дают только то, что поступало в электронном виде. А то, что в очном - по- старинке, в кабинете ознакомления. В свою очередь, докум

4🤯3👍2😢2

Signed Elena Manko

3 Jun 2026, 08:33 UTC324 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Берегите ваше время, товарищи, дела откладываются на 15 июля и дальше, и мне, чтобы это узнать, пришлось доехать до АС МО))

7🤔2

Signed Elena Manko

26 May 2026, 11:42 UTC330 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А трогать тему выживаемости СРО и страховых в зависимости от того, кто, до кого, и в какой последовательности будет добегать, я даже не хочу))

3🔥2🤣2😁1

Signed Elena Manko

26 May 2026, 11:30 UTC284 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

- У меня на это вот такой взгляд, как ты считаешь? - Считаю я хорошо. Особенно хорошо отнимать и делить (с) https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/3a1c823b-a95c-4f9e-90dc-bde95c354bd6/ce5eaa4b-921a-4125-97b2-a74dd1f615b5/A40-225487-2024_20260522_Opredelenie.pdf?isAddStamp=True Вот что я имею сказать по поводу определения по спору НЦРБ к Сапфиру (№ 305-ЭС26-1334 от 22.05.2026): На мой взгляд, эти судебные процессы выгл

👍73🔥1

Signed Elena Manko

21 Apr 2026, 13:27 UTC374 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И в третий раз закинул старик невод в синее море, а ООО СК "ТИТ" обратилось с жалобой в КС РФ. Прошлый раз у нас закончился Постановлением 30-П от 5 июня 2023 года https://rg.ru/documents/2023/06/21/postanovlenie-ksrf-doc.html?ysclid=mo8np65nbj187255188&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.ru%2F и страховые компании стали привлекать в споры не только об убытках, но и по жалобам на действия/бездействия управляющих)) Т

4🔥2👍1

Signed Elena Manko

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mankoexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Manko” (@mankoexpert), 163 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mankoexpert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.