This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,219–3,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 18:40
3,227
-6
5 Sept 2026, 10:58
3,233
-3
1 Sept 2026, 12:16
3,236
-12
29 Aug 2026, 06:53
3,248
-4
26 Aug 2026, 08:03
3,252
-3
23 Aug 2026, 15:49
3,255
-4
19 Aug 2026, 20:34
3,259
-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:14
3,262
-12
13 Aug 2026, 11:35
3,274
-3
10 Aug 2026, 07:51
3,277
-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:34
3,279
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:29
3,279
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
45
48.4%
👍
28
30.1%
🐳
10
10.8%
custom 5866369239740320716
6
6.45%
custom 5884325029126081591
3
3.23%
🤣
1
1.08%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @many_btc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📈Стабильно забирать иксы на текущем рынке стало для нас уже обычным делом.
Да, иногда приходится ждать. Иногда терпеть. Иногда смотреть, как цена ходит вокруг точки входа, и не закрываться раньше времени. Но именно так и зарабатываются действительно большие движения.
И мы делаем это уже более полугода, пока большинство продолжает искать "идеальный момент".
Вы думаете, это просто удачный анализ?
Нет!
Еще в феврале …
Когда у тебя ничего нет - ты можешь замахнуться на невозможное. Потому что тебе нечего терять.
И это делает тебя опасным.
=
Люди сильно недооценивают сколько попыток можно сделать, когда на кону ничего нет.
🚀 Долгожданный обзор проп-фирмы Upscale уже здесь! — СМОТРЕТЬ
В новом ролике мы разобрали:
📊 Статистику Neocart AI Signals
💼 Как приобрести проп-аккаунт и какие преимущества он дает
🔥 Почему проп-трейдинг может стать отличным инструментом для развития вашей торговой стратегии
Важно!
При покупке проп-аккаунта от $10 000 по нашей реферальной ссылке вы получаете 🎁 бесплатный доступ в канал Neocart AI Signals.
Что в…
🆙 Мой личный проп-счёт и челлендж в Upscale
Рынок проп-трейдинга сейчас переживает настоящий бум. Если в 2021 году это была нишевая история, то к 2025 году объем индустрии достиг $30 млрд, показав рост в 1000% за последние 3 года.
Почему все там? Статистика говорит, что уже более 15 млн человек выбирают пропы. Главный триггер - возможность управлять капиталом до $200,000+, рискуя лишь стоимостью челленджа (от $69),…
🗣 «В рынке нет денег» — говорят одни.
А наши клиенты тем временем показывают вот это 👇
📊 Аккаунт с нами с марта 2026
💰 Баланс: 124 791.74 USDT
📈 За всё время: +68 443.52 USDT (+55.49%)
🔥 Июль: +13 625.82 USDT (+11.05%) — и месяц ещё не закончен
При этом максимальная просадка за всё время — всего 17%.
Не идеальная прямая вверх, не сказки про «иксы за неделю». Реальные красные и зелёные дни, реальная торговля, р…
💱Как я решил вопрос ввода/вывода крипты в рубли без нервов
Тема больная: законодательство вокруг крипты и обменников ужесточается почти везде, многие сервисы либо закрываются, либо попадают под пристальное внимание из-за AML. Расскажу, как организовал это для себя — возможно, кому-то пригодится.
Использую Whitebird — сервис, связанный с Парком высоких технологий Беларуси. РБ в целом лояльна к крипте на законодательн…
🤩 Биржа WEEX не стоит на месте!
Мало того что это биржа с огромной ликвидностью и объёмами — теперь ещё и сотни инструментов TradeFi 📈 (вы понимаете, о чём я).
А с 09.07.2026 00:00:00 по 23.07.2026 23:59:59 — челлендж за торговлю активами TradeFi! Делим призовой фонд в $50,000 ✔️
Регистрация - https://www.weex.com/ru/register?vipCode=neocart
Ждем 70 реакций под данным постом по ссылке https://t.me/neocarttrading/1441
И начнем эксперимент который покажет что при грамотном подходе заработать можно и не плохо 🤩
Долгожданная запись нашей прошлой трансляции!
https://youtu.be/BtU-6guNQWM
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @many_btc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@many_btc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@neocart_result named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Engage ADS on Ton @EngageADS · 320,373 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Артур Ратнер «О Деньгах» @ratner_official · 45,761 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Биткоин с нуля с Александром Виноградовым” (@many_btc), 3,227 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/many_btc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.