Channel
@marble_bread_cookiecalypse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004332258380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marble_bread_cookiecalypse |
| Created | 20 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marble_bread_cookiecalypse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 20 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 22 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 21 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 21 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 68 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
27 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌭 | 27 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[ сапп ] : : забавно, что ирл у меня недавно произошла ТАКАЯ ЖЕ СИТУАЦИЯ 😭😭😭😭😭 у меня родители на столе оставили сухарики, ну я их и съел........ правда они были на вкус как мыло. я потом жалуюсь им, мол, они невкусные, а мне говорят, что сухарики вообще-то на год просрочены.........
🌭3
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤ 🌟ㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🍪 🍁анс встретить самого Директора одинокому и ничем не примечательному сотруднику, работающему в самых низах Департамента, крайне мал. ... Но как показывает ситуация, никогда не равен нулю. 🍪🍪и...ректор? "Это была не... Круассан?" ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ Гораздо приятнее было бы встретить в этих недрах доброжелательную и трудолюбивую Круассан, не раз выручающую и вытаскивающую из различных бед, неже…
🌭2
пусть таймкипер услышит пусть таймкипер придёт пусть таймкипер мне отпишет пост
🌭1
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟 🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤ 🌟ㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🍪🍪 меня влезло ещё несколько сендвичей и вся любовь к хотдогам тут же пропала, сменившись на некоторое отвращение. От сытости. Возможно, я переел... Даже не хочется вставать... Было бы очень неплохо так лечь.. сладко зевнуть.. и провалиться в объятия печеньки Мунлайт, забыв обо всём на свете... Я, по правде говоря, ей очень завидую... мне бы тоже хотелось только постоянно спать и ни …
🌭3
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟 🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤ 🌟ㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🍪 🍪то ж, и теперь я сижу, не в полнейшем одиночестве, как было раньше, а с коробкой из 10 самых свежих, самых румяных и выглядящих очень аппетитно ― хотдогов. Настолько красивые внешне, что невольно в голову приходят мысли "а настоящие ли они?". Нет-нет, я не схожу с ума... Кхм. Весь мир реален, я в том числе. Я в другом смысле... В плане, вы же знаете, какие обычно невзрачные хотдог…
🌭3
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🌟🍪ытаетесь меня накормить чем-то помимо сендвичей?... Хотдогами? Так сильно волнуетесь, что ли?... Я же говорю, меня всё устраивает. Хотя... Не помню, когда в последний раз их заказывал в забегаловках. (сколько реакций хотдогов на этом посте будет, столько хотдогов доставит Хлебу таинственный почтальон. поехали)
🌭11
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟 🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🌟🍪егодня что-то новенькое. На мою почту пришло письмо. Я их, по правде говоря, получаю практически ... м-м ... никогда? Коллеги предпочитают приходить ко мне лично, если им требуется помощь. Иногда ещё звонят... Я отвлёкся, кажется. 🤩 🔸оявились ли проблемы с доставкой сэндвичей, когда начался апокалипсис? ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ 🍪е знаю ... В последнее время коллеги мне посылают сэндвичи с благородн…
🌭4
[ сапп ] : : это последнее вп здесь, меня устраивает количество подписчиков можете обратно включать уведы
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟 🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🌟🍪рошу простить за такую долгую пропажу. Снова. У меня ничего не случилось нового за весь промежуток времени моего отсутствия. Пожалуй, это к лучшему... Пока остальные страдают от накопившейся работы (из-за чего коллеги перестали меня так часто посещать), в моём отделе всё спокойно. Удивительно, не правда ли?... Я занимаюсь привычной уборкой, ем сендвичи, иногда сплю ... Жизнь удалась
сапп : со стримами не задалось переходим в апокалипсис 🥺
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟 🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🌟🍪от, кто ответил "нет"... Боюсь, тобой уже заинтересовался наш Директор. Берегись, ха-ха
😀〰️🤩🩶🩶 )ㅤ🍪ㅤ🌟🌟🌟 🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➖ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌟 🌟🍪овый день, новые успехи?.. К сожалению или к счастью, моя работа остаётся прежней: уборка, уборка и ещё раз уборка... Хотя, знаете, сегодня у меня получилось поспать два часика... Кхм. Прошу прощения, засыпаю на ходу... Эх ... Давно я вам не писал, правда? У меня заканчиваются идеи для писем... Впрочем.. Я никогда не славился огромной фантазией, за этим лучше обращайтесь к кому-ни…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @marble_bread_cookiecalypse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔗🍪так... Вам нравятся, к примеру... Сендвичи?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 739,462 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝” (@marble_bread_cookiecalypse), 20 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marble_bread_cookiecalypse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.