Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرگ هم زیباست(وصال نور)

Channel

مرگ هم زیباست(وصال نور)

@marg_ham_zibast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,432subscribers

-234 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001236016024
TypeChannel
Username@marg_ham_zibast
Descriptionمجموعه ﴿مرگ هم زیباست﴾ ارتباط با ادمین👇 @norshoo اموزشهای رایگان @marg_ham_zibast1 ایتا 🟠 @marg_ham_zibast اینستاگرام @lady.energy7 @marg_ham_zibast2 لینک آرشیو کتابها☝️
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/marg_ham_zibast

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,43217,66617,5497 August 2026 — 17,666 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,666 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,662 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,646 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,641 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,633 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,624 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,611 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,599 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,593 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,579 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,570 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,564 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,556 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,564 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,568 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,551 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,543 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,547 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,546 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,542 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,544 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,548 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,552 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,538 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,550 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,536 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,527 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,516 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,506 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,498 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,487 subscribers30 September 2026 — 17,451 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,461 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,463 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,467 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,466 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,460 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,457 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,453 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,449 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,452 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,455 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,450 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,454 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,457 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,460 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,461 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,457 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,453 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,450 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,440 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,445 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,443 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,438 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,433 subscribers7 November 2026 — 17,432 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net -234. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,397–17,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:1117,432-1
6 Nov 2026, 15:1617,433-5
5 Nov 2026, 16:5617,438-5
3 Nov 2026, 19:0617,443-2
2 Nov 2026, 15:4617,445+5
1 Nov 2026, 15:2617,440-10
31 Oct 2026, 12:1517,450-3
30 Oct 2026, 12:0917,453-4
29 Oct 2026, 13:4717,457-4
28 Oct 2026, 16:2017,461+1
27 Oct 2026, 17:3817,460+3
25 Oct 2026, 15:2717,457+3
24 Oct 2026, 14:0917,454+4
23 Oct 2026, 13:3517,450-5
22 Oct 2026, 15:5817,455+3
21 Oct 2026, 07:3617,452+3
20 Oct 2026, 04:5117,449-4
19 Oct 2026, 03:2017,453-4
18 Oct 2026, 00:2017,457-3
17 Oct 2026, 00:3817,460first reading

Engagement

430 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 17,432 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 430 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held430 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total68,303
Reactions total2,397
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,490
Videos
≈681
Links
≈540

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 13s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,620 reactions across 420 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11,65762.6%
🙏2,11111.3%
👍1,5818.49%
😍8154.38%
👏5572.99%
💯4502.42%
❤‍🔥2741.47%
💋2721.46%
😭2581.39%
😢2421.30%
🤩1290.693%
😱1080.58%
🕊950.51%
🫡330.177%
👀190.102%
🤗190.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 420 of the 430 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,620 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 430 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (9.68%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC242 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026

سلام و وقت بخیر به شما عزیزان و بانوان نورانی یک معجزه از حصار خضری براتون می خوام بگم من پسر عمویی دارم که ۱۰ سال پیش عقد کردن و در نامزدی طلاق گرفتن سن شون بالا بود نزدیک چهل سالشونه و اصلا به ازدواج دیگه فکر نمیکرد آخرای ماه صفر من با زن عموم تو مجلس روضه ی امام حسین (ع) بودم و زن عموم خیلی بی قراری می کرد و میگفت آقا رضا زن نمیگیره اصلا نمیتونیم باهاش حرف بزنیم در این مورد من بهشون گفتم یه گروه هست جشنواره نور دا…

👏15👍1😍1

7 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC931 views29 reactionsread 8 November 2026

سلام و درود خداوند بر بانوان نور . الهی همیشه سالم و سلامت باشید .من چندین ساله با بانوان نور همراه هستم از اینستا آشنایی ام شروع شد .بعد هم تلگرام تا الان حدود ۵ سال یا بیشتر می شه که با این عزیزان همراه هستم و مرتب نوردرمانی ها و روتینها را هر چی بانوان گفتند .بدون شبهه و بدون سوال و جواب انجام دادم . و الحمدالله کما هو اهله راضی هستم . بخوام نتیجه بگم خوب وقت زیاد می گیره. اما جدید ترین نتیجه از نوشتن زیارت عاشور…

😍19❤9🤩1

6 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,770 views51 reactionsread 8 November 2026

گنبدجان درمورد حصار خضری وچله ی نور وذکر الف لام میم میخواستم بگم که واقعا گره گشاهستن واقعا شما نور هستید و خداوند شما رو سرراه ما قرارداده هرکسی لیاقت اینو نداره اگه بخوام از نتیجه ها بگم که نیجه های زیادی دیدیم همین که آرامش درزندگی داریم کنار بچه هامون خودش کلی نتیجه اس نمازهای به موقع و اینکه از غیبت و قضاوت کردن دیگران بتونیم جلوی خودمو بگیریم من فکرمی‌کنم بزرگترین نعمتیه که نصیبمون شده من برانماز صبح هرکاری می…

❤37👏7😍4💋3

6 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,670 views76 reactionsread 8 November 2026

باورتون فقط به خدای مهربان و امن باشد

❤65💋4😍4👏3

6 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,660 views59 reactionsread 8 November 2026

بانو راد آنقدر که به شما و بانوان اعتماد و باور دارم تو کل دوره بارداریم همه نوردرمانی ها رو شرکت کردم الحمدلله راضی بود،دو روز که زایمان کردم

😍45🤗8💋4❤2

6 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,650 views36 reactionsread 8 November 2026

سلام خدمت بانوهای عزیز من شش ماه واردکانالتون روتین هارو مرتب انجام میدم اینقدر این چندماه معجزه ریزودرشت زیاد دیدم فقط شب وروزدعاتون میکنم من اول ازپاکسازی منزل شروع کردم از بعد پاکسازی دیگه گره مشکلاتم بازشد ازبیماری دخترم که چندسال پیش جراحی شد بعد عمل هردفعه میبردیمش دکترمیگفتن چندسال دیگه دوباره جراحی داره اینسری به لطف شما دکترگفت حالش خوبه همین روال پیش بره دیگه نیازی به جراحی نیست واقعا معجزه ازاین بهتر🙏ازخ…

🙏23❤10💋3

6 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,790 views126 reactionsread 8 November 2026

یکی از وضعیت‌ هایی که افراد مبتلا به اضطراب زیاد تجربه‌ش میکنن، حالتِ انتظار است. مثلا اگه قرار باشه ساعت ۷ عصر یه قرار ملاقات داشته باشن، ممکنه در تمام طول روز دیگه نتونن روی هیچ کار دیگه‌ ای تمرکز کنن. مدام ساعت رو چک میکنن، به قرار پیشِ رو فکر می‌کنن و کارهایی رو که باید انجام بدن به تعویق می‌ اندازن. چون مغز اون‌ها اتفاقی رو که قراره در پیش داشته باشن، اون‌قدر از نظر ذهنی بزرگ و انرژی‌بر در نظر می‌گیره که انگار …

👍84😭17❤15👏7🤩2💋1

5 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,970 views100 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ذهن پراکنده، دشمن پیشرفته. تحقیقات روان‌شناسی شناختی نشون می‌ده که جابه‌جایی مداوم بین کارها، بخشی از انرژی ذهنی ما رو صرف بازیابی تمرکز می‌کنه. گاهی مشکل ما کمبود تلاش نیست؛ پراکنده کردن توانایی‌هامون بین مسیرهای مختلفه. ذهنی که مدام مسیر عوض می‌کنه، فرصت عمیق شدن در هیچ مسیری رو پیدا نمی‌کنه.

👍63❤24🙏10💯3

5 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC≈2,140 views73 reactionsread 8 November 2026

از خدمت حضرت علامه طهرانی رضوان الله علیه سوال شد: گاهى بيدار مى‌شويم ولى همّت برخاستن نداريم، برايمان دعا كنيد تا توفيق نماز شب پيدا كنيم. مى‌فرمودند: توفيق يعنى مهيّاشدن أسباب و مقدّمات امور و براى نماز شب خود سالك بايد همّت كند و أسباب و مقدّمات بيدارى خود را فراهم نمايد. و إلّا اگر به دعا باشد اين توفيق نيز خود دعا مى‌خواهد و هَلُمَّ جرّا و تسلسل لازم مى‌آيد. عمده مقدّماتى كه سالك بايد تحصيل كند از اين قرار است:…

❤54🙏17💯2

4 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,370 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026

تلگرامم خیلی ضعیفه اصلا نمیتونم پیاما رو چک کنم حتما ایتا باشید

💯37💋3

4 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTC≈2,400 views50 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

سلام بانو جان صبحتون بخیر وشادی بانوجان برروی فشنگ میشه طلسم بخت بستن من سه سال پیش ی پسر تومحیط کارخیلی بهم علاقه پیداکرد من درخواست رد میدادم واون بهم هیچ حتی ی شاخه گل نداد ی روز اومد ی فشنگ بهم داد بعد من ب مامانم گفتم مامانم برداشتش ببره تیرش کنه پیش یکی من از بد شناسی تاامروز نگهش داشتم آدمایی خیلی خوبی سرراهم قرارمیگرفت یاطرف سرد میشد یامن تاامروز ک من ناخودآگاه یهویی فشنگ تواتو ساکم دراومدم نمیدونم باع…

❤49😱1

3 Nov 2026, 01:58 UTC≈2,850 views235 reactionsread 8 November 2026

دعا کنید دوستان! بعد از دعا،به خود تلقین کنید، دعاهای من همیشه مستجاب میشوند! در دعا کردن، دست و دلباز باشید، برای خودتان، برای دیگران... هیچ فرقی نگذارید! عادت کنید، به دعا کردن! باور کنید، دعا کردن، کار عجیب و غریبی نیست، و از عهده ی هر شخصی، و در هر زمان و مکان و شرایطی امکان پذیر هست. از حساب پس انداز انسان، که چیزی کم نمیشود! پس خوشایند هست همانقدر که انسان برای خودش می خواهد، برای دیگری نیز بخواهد، و یا شاید …

❤167🙏33👍17💯15😢2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 430 posts we hold for @marg_ham_zibast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@marg_ham_zibast edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @marg_ham_zibast as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTCAnonymous Poll127 voters

ختم صلوات هدیه به رسول خدا

  1. صدتا70%
  2. دویست12%
  3. پانصد18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll114 voters

ختم صلوات هدیه به همه اموات گرفتار در برزخ

  1. صدتا82%
  2. دویست تا19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

گل صلوات هدیه به پیامبر اکرم 👇✅

  1. صدتا69%
  2. دویست تا16%
  3. پانصد16%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 430 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚖️ DNA_Pluse⚖️
@dnapluse · 29,873
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرگ هم زیباست(وصال نور)” (@marg_ham_zibast), 17,432 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marg_ham_zibast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.