Channel
@margo_rozanova_trener
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,478subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001325363711 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @margo_rozanova_trener |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/margo_rozanova_trener |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 1,478 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 1,484 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 1,487 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:48 | 1,483 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 1,486 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,490 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,485 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,482 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 1,477 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 1,478 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 1,481 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,480 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 1,480 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 34.6% | |
| custom 5402170394159377493 | 8 | 30.8% | |
| custom 5402168920985593322 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5328217942154831511 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5402320481791535357 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 3.85% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За 1,5 ч я сделала первый в жизни мультик, про Андрея и нашего кота Лосося 😍 с первого раза! У меня столько идей про применение … Мультиковый маркетинг ))) Мультяшный маркетинг)) Это самое душевное что я видела в контенте) Сфера применения так широка 😍 Так, навскидку: 🔹Мультики о вашей семье 🔹Подарки на свадьбу, дни рождения, юбилеи 🔹Сюжеты про вас и клиентов 🔹Игровое донесение сложных вещей И это все я буду …
🔥6
НАШ ПЕРВЫЙ МУЛЬТИК 😱😎😍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Это что за волшебство вообще такое
🔥3❤🔥2💔1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥1custom 53282179421548315111custom 54021689209855933221
Роль фотографий в блоге, ленте и личном бренде Если у вас мало фоток в галерее телефона, и вы не уверены, нужны ли вообще фото в эпоху коротких видео — эфир для вас. Если вы хотите круто влиять через контент — тем более! Короче, рекомендую очень 👌🏻 #маргорозанова #личныйбренд #тренерпоблогерству #блогинг #блогерство
Video message, posted without a caption
Теперь сторис в Максе есть и на айфонах))
custom 54021703941593774931
А раз так … ни слова больше! Эфиру быть 🩷 «РОЛЬ ФОТОГРАФИЙ В БЛОГЕ, ЛЕНТЕ И ЛИЧНОМ БРЕНДЕ» В эфире соединю всё по теме продвижения, продаж, самооценки, репутации, соцрейтинга … сплетем опыт из тренерства по блогерству с модельным и визажным прошлым. И с тем фактом, что я досконально знаю, что такое — притягивать к себе внимание и тригерить визуалом 👑💋👠💄🔥❤️
custom 54021689209855933221
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54021703941593774931
Сторис — самый недооцененный и самый важный тип контента 🩷 Смотрите запись эфира, почему это так. Если видео не загружается, то посмотрите запись на моей странице в Инст 👌🏻 #маргорозанова #тренерпоблогерству #настоящесть #идеидлясторис
Сегодня следующая серия, буду говорить про сторис. Про 25 причин их вести) так же, в инсте у себя https://www.instagram.com/wow_margo_
Вау, я сейчас посмотрела запись вчерашнего спикерства на эфире компании SNC WORLD 🎙 Спикер: Президент компании SNC World Кирилл Ануфриев ⭐ Специальный гость — Я 🩷 ——— Запись доступна на ВК и ютуб: 🔗 VK Видео https://vkvideo.ru/video1050874596_456239022 🔗 YouTube https://youtube.com/live/eysy8yLVZ50?feature=share Просто прямой эфир, прикиньте)) снятый как подкаст))
custom 54021703941593774933
Сотрудничество с сильными брендами — это повод стать ещё сильнее 🧡 Люблю, когда компания ставит перед собой амбициозные задачи. Например, посмотрите на фото. Это студия. Студия компании, специально оснащенная с нуля дорогим оборудованием. Можно было бы и в подкаст-студиях снимать, а можно вот так: сделать студию для самих себя. Это — амбициозно, дорого, и явно не ради пары роликов 😁 Мне интересно в таких местах, с …
custom 54021703941593774933custom 54021689209855933221custom 54023204817915353571
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @margo_rozanova_trener. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В ГОСТЯХ У МАРГО | Блогерство, Личный бренд” (@margo_rozanova_trener), 1,478 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/margo_rozanova_trener.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.