Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мария Куценко Коуч•Энергопрактик

Channel

Мария Куценко Коуч•Энергопрактик

@maria_kutsenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711848721
TypeChannel
Username@maria_kutsenko
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maria_kutsenko

Growth

1081101097 August 2026 — 109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 109 subscribers30 August 2026 — 108 subscribers7 September 2026 — 110 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:38110+2
30 Aug 2026, 09:14108-1
9 Aug 2026, 07:45109no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:09109first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3451.5%
🔥1624.2%
👍69.09%
🥰69.09%
💯23.03%
❤‍🔥11.52%
😁11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2025 to 29 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2025, 09:48 UTC532 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо, что спрашивайте) да, со мной все в порядке. Но совсем нет возможности выделить регулярное время на ведение канала. Кому необходима консультация, в частном порядке смогу предложить варианты)

29 Apr 2025, 09:48 UTC514 viewsread 9 August 2026

Доброго дня, Мария! Куда-то Вы пропали, все в порядке? 🌼

25 Mar 2025, 08:00 UTC608 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

7🥰3👍2

14 Feb 2025, 12:38 UTC647 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Никогда не отмечала 14 февраля, пока не случилось это… Хорошо помню выражение лица моего мужа, когда мы были первый год в отношениях и я сказала, что не люблю всю эту суету с подарками на миллион поводов. Я называю это «подарочным насилием» 😄 Как же ему полегчало, когда я сказала, что 14 февраля для меня всегда был и будет обычным днем. Я вообще не ванильная фея и не люблю слишком сладкую романтику. Но пото

11🥰3😁1

11 Feb 2025, 08:54 UTC386 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Нелюбовь к себе Такая глубокая и такая некорректно преподнесенная нам тема. Все, что вы слышали чаще всего про любовь к себе - маркетинговое искажение, чтобы вы из этой «любви к себе» покупали много всего ненужного. А истинная любовь к себе не заканчивается на «побаловать себя» и «принять такой, какая ты есть». Это значит, разобраться со всем, что вас касается. Если разбирать героиню фильма, то там все начин

🔥5

11 Feb 2025, 08:42 UTC213 viewsread 9 August 2026

Посмотрела фильм. Интересный. Быть всегда красивой, молодой, сексуальной для миллионов телезрителей. Для меня акцентом выразилось не любовь к себе. Готовность пожертвовать своим телом ради признания на публике и её любви.

7 Feb 2025, 10:10 UTC238 viewsread 9 August 2026

Кто уже смотрел, поделитесь как вам?)

7 Feb 2025, 10:06 UTC222 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо за обзор, заинтересовал фильм на основе Вашего мнения, наверное посмотрю

6 Feb 2025, 15:32 UTC257 viewsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Психологический разбор фильма «Субстанция» 00:00 Что за мерзость?! Это Body Horror! 03:18 Что мы о себе думаем и кем на самом деле являемся 06:03 Можно ли заслужить любовь? 08:11 В чем подвох сильного желания «получить здесь и сейчас»

3 Feb 2025, 10:50 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Фильм с глубоким смыслом или просто мерзость? Долго думала смотреть или не смотреть этот фильм. Сам сюжет меня заинтересовал сразу, но после огромного количества отзывов про множество мерзких сцен, да еще вкупе с тем, что это ужасы, я решила воздержаться. Но любопытство плюс доскональное уточнение про моменты, от которых я могу потерять свой и так не стабильный сон, взяли свое. Фильм не оставил меня равнодушно

2

25 Jan 2025, 09:49 UTC202 viewsread 9 August 2026

Причем тут мама и папа? Подробнее в подкасте ⬆️

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maria_kutsenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мария Куценко Коуч•Энергопрактик” (@maria_kutsenko), 110 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maria_kutsenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.