Было, девочки?😭
🔥2🤩2

Channel
@maria_shady
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,337subscribers
-170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001418996108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maria_shady |
| Description | Стилист https://instagram.com/maria_shady , фэшн-блогер. Эксперт Marie Claire, VOICE, ТВ ПЯТНИЦА. На канале - модные образы, тренды, обзоры🔥 По вопросам сотрудничества - @maria_shady_pr Почта [email protected] РКН: https://clck.ru/3LE35v |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maria_shady |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:50 | 13,337 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 13,343 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 13,348 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:45 | 13,353 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:04 | 13,358 | +14 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:28 | 13,344 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:58 | 13,343 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 13,345 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 13,342 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 13,350 | +9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 13,341 | +12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 13,329 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 13,327 | +4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 13,323 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 13,334 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 13,336 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:57 | 13,337 | +3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 13,334 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 13,340 | +7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 13,333 | first reading |
125 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 125 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,714 |
| Reactions total | 364 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,161 reactions across 117 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 384 | 33.1% | |
| 🔥 | 247 | 21.3% | |
| 👍 | 201 | 17.3% | |
| 💯 | 60 | 5.17% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 3.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 41 | 3.53% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 2.93% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 2.93% | |
| 🤩 | 34 | 2.93% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 1.89% | |
| 😍 | 19 | 1.64% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.603% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.603% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.517% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.517% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.345% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.258% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.172% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.172% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.172% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.258% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maria_shady. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 125 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Было, девочки?😭
🔥2🤩2
Мари Краймбрери заинтриговала поклонников новой фотосессией! 🖤 Певица опубликовала свежие кадры и сопроводила их довольно загадочной фразой: «Каждый новый этап требует смелости. Я пока не готова, но мы уже начали». Похоже, за этими словами скрывается нечто большее, чем просто красивые фотографии. Мари явно готовится к переменам, но пока оставляет поклонникам возможность самим строить догадки. Люблю такие небольшие…
👍4❤3🔥2💯1
Что носить зимой 2027: 9 моделей, которые освежат гардероб Зимой хочется уюта, но и про красивые образы забывать не стоит. В новом сезоне обратите внимание на модели, которые легко впишутся в повседневный гардероб: 1. Свитер с высоким горлом. 2. Свитер на молнии. 3. Модели с V-образным вырезом. 4. Лёгкие свитера-паутинки. 5. Пушистый трикотаж и ангорка. 6. Кардиганы с крупными пуговицами. 7. Трикотаж с меховой отде…
❤5👌5👍1🤩1
Лепс в любимчиках у зумеров, а Лазарев и Гагарина — на вершине рейтинга! 🎤 ВЦИОМ представил рейтинг самых популярных исполнителей 2026 года, и здесь есть на что посмотреть. Первое место среди мужчин и женщин заняли Сергей Лазарев и Полина Гагарина — оба артиста давно заслужили свою аудиторию и умеют удерживать внимание слушателей. В мужскую десятку также вошли Филипп Киркоров, Дима Билан, Баста, Akmal’ и Ваня Дмитр…
😁4💯3👏2🤩2❤1🎉1👍1
Милла Йовович в новой съёмке для Flaunt Magazine — настоящая эстетика движения и красоты! ✨ На фотографиях, снятых Грегом Суэйлзом, актриса словно застыла посреди танца: выразительные позы, пластика и особая атмосфера, в которой хочется рассматривать каждую деталь. Милла умеет выглядеть эффектно без лишней вычурности, и эта съёмка — прекрасное тому подтверждение. Получилось очень стильно, артистично и совсем не бан…
🔥7👍3❤2🎉2💯2👏1🤩1😁1
5 лет назад после развода мой мир полностью рухнул. А сейчас я вдруг поняла, что больше не боюсь остаться одна. Меня часто спрашивают, как я переживаю расставание с Максимом. И я наконец созрела, чтобы немного об этом рассказать. Пять лет назад, когда я разводилась, мне казалось, что жизнь буквально разваливается на части. Я не понимала, что будет дальше, за что хвататься и как вообще со всем справиться. Почвы под …
🔥12❤5❤🔥3🎉2👍1💯1🤩1
Наталья Водянова напомнила, как выглядит настоящая вечерняя роскошь! 💙 На гала-ужине NIANCE в Шанхае модель выбрала нежно-голубое платье Zuhair Murad из коллекции весна-лето 2027. Открытые плечи, мягкие драпировки, сверкающий корсаж и высокий разрез создали выразительный силуэт, а золотое колье и сумочка с бахромой добавили образу интересные акценты. Я просто не могу пройти мимо такого сочетания цвета и деталей! В …
❤5👍3🎉1💯1🤩1
Зима 2026/27: 8 головных уборов, которые формируют эстетику сезона Этой зимой головной убор - уже не просто способ согреться, а полноценный fashion-акцент, который способен преобразить даже самый простой образ. Что выбираем? Докеры - лаконичный минимализм. Хулиганские кепки - винтажный шик. Косынки - французская эстетика. Береты - вне времени. Теплые панамы - фактуры и объём. Ушанки - акцент с характером. Балаклав…
❤10👍5🎉2👏2💯2🤩1😁1
Почему вы выглядите ниже ростом? Иногда одежда может «забрать» несколько сантиметров роста буквально визуально. И при этом проблема совсем не в вашей фигуре. Разбираю ошибки в пропорциях, которые дробят силуэт, и показываю, как сделать его визуально более вытянутым. Хотите отдельный разбор приёмов, которые визуально добавляют рост?
👍9👏5🔥3❤1😁1
Хейли Бибер блистала в золоте на CFDA Fashion Awards: образ оказался не таким простым, как кажется На церемонии CFDA Fashion Awards в Нью-Йорке Хейли Бибер появилась в эффектном золотом образе Saint Laurent. Модель выбрала наряд из коллекции бренда, созданный дизайнером Энтони Ваккарелло. На первый взгляд кажется, что на Хейли длинное платье, но на самом деле это сочетание нескольких вещей: расшитая золотистая юбка…
🔥5👏4❤2💯2🎉1🤩1
Я могу всё сама. Но с чего все решили, что я ХОЧУ всё сама? Я привыкла быть сильной. Решать вопросы, строить планы, справляться с трудностями и всё контролировать. Даже когда хочется просто лечь, накрыться одеялом и сделать так, чтобы меня никто не трогал, я собираю себя по частям и делаю то, что запланировала 😅 И знаете, что я поняла? Я не хочу всю жизнь быть той самой девушкой, которая со всем справится сама. Я …
💯8❤7🔥4😁4👍3👏2🤩2
Селена Гомес и Деми Ловато вернули нас в эпоху Disney! Звёзды снялись вместе в образах, вдохновлённых фильмом «Программа защиты принцесс» 2009 года: пышные платья, тиары и чемоданы — настоящая ностальгия по детству. Но это не просто красивая съёмка: Rare Beauty объединился с Деми для выпуска нового набора румян стоимостью около 50 долларов. Коллаборацию посвятили дружбе Селены и Деми, которая длится почти 25 лет, е…
❤6💯3🔥3😁3👍2🎉1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @maria_shady. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Шеди | Стиль, мода, покупки” (@maria_shady), 13,337 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maria_shady.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.