Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,634–15,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 10:21
14,678
-25
15 Sept 2026, 12:18
14,703
-6
12 Sept 2026, 00:20
14,709
-14
9 Sept 2026, 18:37
14,723
-18
6 Sept 2026, 09:39
14,741
-4
3 Sept 2026, 23:41
14,745
+3
2 Sept 2026, 17:12
14,742
-5
1 Sept 2026, 17:17
14,747
-25
31 Aug 2026, 15:44
14,772
-8
30 Aug 2026, 14:05
14,780
-1
29 Aug 2026, 14:38
14,781
-8
28 Aug 2026, 11:47
14,789
-10
27 Aug 2026, 15:13
14,799
-3
26 Aug 2026, 17:48
14,802
-8
25 Aug 2026, 17:34
14,810
-17
24 Aug 2026, 18:28
14,827
-3
23 Aug 2026, 01:17
14,830
-7
21 Aug 2026, 14:27
14,837
-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:12
14,841
-3
19 Aug 2026, 19:42
14,844
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 14,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
13 (29 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
6,610
Reactions total
1,332
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
7,186 reactions across 13 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,790
66.7%
❤🔥
980
13.6%
🙏
465
6.47%
🔥
338
4.70%
😍
167
2.32%
🕊
137
1.91%
🎉
97
1.35%
🤗
60
0.835%
💯
34
0.473%
👏
21
0.292%
👍
19
0.264%
🦄
14
0.195%
💔
13
0.181%
🐳
11
0.153%
🤩
10
0.139%
🤣
6
0.083%
🍓
5
0.07%
🍾
4
0.056%
👌
4
0.056%
💘
4
0.056%
5 further kinds
7
0.097%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
69
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 13 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maridernova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нет чудес, есть та или иная степень знания…
Любимая цитата из одной очень значимой для меня книги.
Знания - инструмент созидания.
Сегодня я держу на руках самое большое чудо в своей жизни и осознаю: ведь оно тоже материализовалось с помощью Знания!
Как и все остальное, что у многих считается «нереальным» в наше время:
Счастливые отношения с искренностью и общими ценностями.
Изобилие во всех проявлениях.
Возможно…
2 месяца в новой роли 💐
Или как прошел мой второй месяц материнства…
Он был сложнее первого для меня, скажу честно. Усталость подошла к пику, местами я чувствовала себя зомби.
На фото можно наблюдать человека, который не спал более 2 х часов подряд уже 2 месяца…
Казалось, вся структура моей прежней жизни разрушилась, как мандала в буддийском храме. А я ее так долго собирала. Не один десяток лет.
На мой взгляд, она…
Вот такая энергия моего лета 2026 🤱🏻
Мы с моим новым другом пока неразлучны совсем)
Сегодня побывали в месте, где 7 недель назад он родился… Кажется, будто год с того момента прошел.
И еще хочу сказать, что очень чувствую, как между вами и мной снова пошла энергия. Рада быть на связи с миром, хоть пока и не на 100%
Поток разворачивается с огромной силой.
Даже интересно, что будет дальше.
Что-то абсолютно новое… у в…
Прошли 40 дней моего послеродового восстановления.
Понимаю, что эта цифра не случайна.
Я ведь действительно только несколько дней как начала чувствовать себя собой.
Как будто мое новое «Я»наконец-то собирается в единую структуру.
Начинаю хотеть созидать, открываться, делиться✨
Множество пазлов-инсайтов складываются в красивые узоры.
Но думаю еще нужно какое-то время чтобы полностью войти в свой поток.
А вот то, ч…
Мои осознания в первый месяц материнства
Во-первых, я не представляла что могу быть одновременно настолько счастливой и настолько же уставшей😄
Я будто в один миг поняла чувства всех мам Планеты. Как будто это одна мама говорит во всех нас. И теперь во мне тоже ее голос.
Я увидела, что роды - это действительно самая сильная и быстрая трансформация, которая может произойти с женщиной.
Уехала рожать одним человеком, …
Сегодня ровно 10 лет со дня нашей свадьбы 🩷
Смотрю на эти фотографии и понимаю, сколько всего произошло с того дня.
Эта съёмка была сделана всего за три недели до родов. У нас дома. В нашей обычной жизни.
А сегодня, спустя три недели после рождения сына, мне захотелось поблагодарить людей, которые помогали на этом пути.
Во-первых, госпиталь MD GROUP Лахта «Мать и дитя», где на берегу Финского залива проходили наш…
Небольшое включение из моего уютного периода👩🏻🍼
Это одно из последних интервью, которое я записала во время беременности. (Была тогда на 7 м месяце и вела группу «Алхимии»)
Оно уже давно опубликовано на YouTube, но в своём Telegram-канале я им так и не поделилась. Как будто было не время…
ВИдение было тогда очень ясным, особенно сильным!
Поэтому и обсуждали вопросы о которых я крайне редко говорю
✔️Будущее челов…
Сегодня Клубничное полнолуние 🌕
Обычно по полнолуниям я записывала для вас аудиопослания, а сегодня передам все текстом. Прежде всего, в этот день я хочу поблагодарить за все ваши пожелания и теплые слова.
Читаю все сообщения.
Жаль, что не могу ответить лично на каждое, но всё чувствую. Наполняюсь…
Начиная с древних времён считается, что восстановление после родов у женщины длится 40 дней.
Поэтому я хочу взять ор…
❤267❤🔥74🙏41😍4💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @maridernova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мастерская Сергея Финько @sverhcheloveksf · 28,749 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Исцеляющие Медитации @livanda_meditation · 30,600 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Тайное Сообщество @secrsociety · 30,412 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
Эра Водолея @AgeofAquariusuncensored · 28,490 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
Переход в ТАК. ДОМ @prostovtak · 25,528 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Ключи Мастерства @kluchimasterstva · 30,801 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
ПОРА ПРОСНУТЬСЯ | Прогрессивная макро психология @vselenamaster_ps · 74,737 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Школа Михаила Агеева @ageevschool · 53,871 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Марина Тушевская. Канал @tushevskaia · 23,197 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Развитие с Игорем Будниковым: марафоны и обучающие курсы @welcomebackhome · 28,079 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Дмитрий Лапшинов ЗОЖ @dmitrii_lapshinov · 24,649 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Ада Кондэ - личный канал - Ada Conde @Adaconde1 · 125,344 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Дернова” (@maridernova), 14,678 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maridernova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.