Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки Марка Твена

Channel

Записки Марка Твена

@mark_twain_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,586subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001937174695
TypeChannel
Username@mark_twain_tg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mark_twain_tg

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5851,5981,591.57 August 2026 — 1,598 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,598 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,596 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,595 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,591 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,589 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,586 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,585 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,586 subscribers1,5867 August 202615 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 39 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,583–1,600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 14:401,586+1
11 Sept 2026, 23:361,585-1
7 Sept 2026, 04:001,586-3
27 Aug 2026, 00:571,589-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:141,591-2
20 Aug 2026, 11:331,593-2
17 Aug 2026, 21:431,595+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:291,594-2
11 Aug 2026, 09:031,596-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:151,598no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:171,598first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,000 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁50525.3%
👍46323.2%
💯27713.9%
21310.7%
🔥20010.0%
🤣1306.50%
🤔723.60%
👏582.90%
🎄231.15%
🥰221.10%
😢211.05%
👌30.15%
👎30.15%
❤‍🔥20.1%
🆒20.1%
💔20.1%
😇20.1%
🖕10.05%
😎10.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2023 to 9 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Nov 2023, 15:41 UTC≈9,260 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Человек не должен критиковать других на той почве, на которой он сам не может стоять перпендикулярно.

😁78👍42💯289🤣7🎄4🆒2🖕1

9 Nov 2023, 10:44 UTC≈9,190 views135 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Человек с характером всегда отвергает первое предложение, каково бы оно ни было.

🤔46😁3416👍14🔥11💯9🥰4🎄1

9 Nov 2023, 08:20 UTC≈9,000 views125 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В жизни каждого настоящего мальчишки наступает время, когда его обуревает неистовое желание найти зарытый клад.

🔥56👍3714😁11💯7

8 Nov 2023, 17:48 UTC≈8,780 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оптимист: человек, путешествующий из Нигде в Ничто в поисках счастья.

👍62🔥23🤔114

8 Nov 2023, 15:00 UTC≈8,220 views104 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть такие прирожденные ворчуны, которые видят только одну перемену к худшему. Я знавал одну такую старую негритянку. Один молодой человек из Нью-Йорка сказал при ней: «Какая у вас здесь чудесная луна». Она вздохнула и сказала: «Эх, милый мой, благослови вас Бог, – посмотрели бы вы на эту луну до войны!» (Эту историю включил в свой репертуар Оскар Уайльд после поездки в Америку.)

😁7112🔥10👍5🤣4🎄2

8 Nov 2023, 12:12 UTC≈6,920 views102 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нет зрелища более грустного, чем молодой пессимист, за исключением старого оптимиста.

👏43😁20🔥159👍4🤣3💔2🥰2

8 Nov 2023, 09:10 UTC≈6,230 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Часто бывает, что человек, который ни разу в жизни не соврал, берется судить о том, что правда, а что ложь.

👍4210😁8🎄2👎2🥰2

8 Nov 2023, 05:13 UTC≈5,730 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прежде всего нужны факты, а уж потом можно делать с ними, что хочешь.

👍42👏109👌3🥰3😁1

7 Nov 2023, 08:01 UTC≈5,780 views128 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Человек – религиозное животное; единственное животное, которое любит ближнего своего, как самого себя, и перерезает ему глотку, если расходится с ним в богословских вопросах.

💯9216👍13🤔4😢2🎄1

7 Nov 2023, 05:15 UTC≈5,000 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Учить себя самого – благородное дело, но еще более благородное – учить других; кстати, последнее куда легче.

💯59😁25👍8🔥87👏1

6 Nov 2023, 18:01 UTC≈4,580 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нет людей более грубых, чем чересчур утонченные натуры.

💯5115🔥10👍8🤔7❤‍🔥2

6 Nov 2023, 14:44 UTC≈4,460 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недостаточную глубину своей проповеди он восполнил ее длиной.

🔥43😁358👍4🤣4🎄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mark_twain_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Азбука Здоровья
@zdorovazbuka · 37,661
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки Марка Твена” (@mark_twain_tg), 1,586 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mark_twain_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.