Channel
@markdietefiko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
355subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001537725241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markdietefiko |
| Created | 14 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markdietefiko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 355 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 357 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 357 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 162 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
197 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404716236024061757 | 55 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 24.4% | |
| custom 5438361523762260852 | 38 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5343569293437052113 | 21 | 10.7% | |
| ⚡ | 16 | 8.12% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 6.60% | |
| custom 5355201662602455096 | 6 | 3.05% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
But the darker the weather, the better the man, You can take all you want, but not who I am. ✨✨✨×✨🥰✨✨✨✨ 🤩 📸: el.shushuru #Тефа_косплеит🔤#SpyXfamily🔤#loidforger
❤🔥9custom 54047162360240617579custom 53552016626024550966custom 53435692934370521134custom 54383615237622608523
Каждое лето делать какие-то крылья, видимо, традиция. Обожаю смотреть этот переход от чертежа к готовому, но мне все еще сложно не забывать снимать процессники, поэтому эпичного эдита не будет. 😔 Это пока самое простое, что я собирала. Только монотонная работа по вырезанию перьев, а потом их текстурированию, формированию, сбору в нужном порядке... Да, я решила усложнить себе жизнь поэтому тут десятки разных форм дл…
custom 54047162360240617579custom 54383615237622608526custom 53435692934370521133
Mark Tefiko и приколы pinned a photo
топ 10 неожиданных развязок
custom 54047162360240617576⚡3
Друзья! Мы прошли на вайбкон 🤩🤩 Будем выступать в женатиках вместе с мужем 😮💨😊 Ph: @steinph
custom 540471623602406175711⚡5
🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 I'm a shadow in the sun with no place to hide You can't fix a broken heart with a broken head 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟: el.shushuru #Тефа_косплеит 🌟 #ClottedCreamCookie 🌟 #cookierunkingdom
❤20custom 54383615237622608525custom 53435692934370521134custom 54047162360240617572⚡1❤🔥1
✨ Фуррина Де Котейн 🐱 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 все белым-бело, ты танцуешь краше, чем всегда. 🌟🌟🌟 ты танцуешь в снежном шаре – я учу движения. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Фоточки с ВК Феста😘 📸: DukVu #Тефа_косплеит🐾#Фурина🐾#геншин
❤23custom 543836152376226085212custom 540471623602406175711❤🔥3⚡1
Самый главный кружочек с феста⬆️⬆️
custom 53435692934370521134⚡2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4⚡2
💜💜 💜💜💜💜 Вот говорят, что полезно опускаться с небес на землю, но я считаю, что полезно с этой земли к небесам подниматься 🥺 Вк фест — это уровень, настолько насыщенный всеми видами развлекух фест, что я не знаю, кем надо быть, чтобы не кайфануть или сказать, что было скучно. У меня была только одна проблема — невозможно разорваться, чтобы поучаствовать везде и посмотреть всё. Хочешь попсу? На. Инди рок? Тоже на. Рэп…
custom 543836152376226085212custom 54047162360240617577custom 53435692934370521136⚡2❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @markdietefiko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 23,077 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mark Tefiko и приколы” (@markdietefiko), 355 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markdietefiko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.