Channel
@marketologvl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
795subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001736029105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marketologvl |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marketologvl |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 795 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 798 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 800 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 799 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 798 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 802 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 802 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 40.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 18.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы много лет работаем с Денисом Гарьевичем, владельцем клиники эстетической стоматологии D’esten, стоматологом-ортопедом, хирургом и гнатологом. А как его пациент я точно знаю: он и его команда классные профессионалы. Поэтому с радостью поддержала идею Дениса Гарьевича запустить собственный подкаст. Моя задача была сделать сложный профессиональный разговор понятным и интересным каждому. На подкасте собрались стомато…
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
Приехала выпить кофе в видом на море. И внезапно встретила Елену Кондрацкую. Ну какой ж тут кофе, когда надо срочно рассказать и про то, что нашла студию для съемок подкастов, и про идеи для блога, и про новую нейросеть для оптимизации всех планерок и встреч🤭
🔥6
YouTube или Instagram? Недавно клиент спросил меня: — Нина, а почему вы рекомендуете нам развивать именно YouTube? Разве клиентов нельзя искать через Instagram? Мне очень понравился этот вопрос. Потому что многие компании выбирают площадку так же, как выбирают витрину магазина: где красивее, современнее или привычнее. Но социальные сети давно перестали быть просто витринами. Они стали дорогами, по которым человек …
Есть очень простой критерий. Если перед покупкой человек ищет ответ на свою проблему, начинает изучать тему, сравнивает варианты и хочет разобраться — начинайте с YouTube. Если решение принимается под влиянием эмоций, визуального впечатления и регулярного общения с брендом, то быстрее и лучше сработает Instagram. В случае с таможенным оформлением ответ для меня очевиден. Люди приходят сюда не за вдохновением. Они пр…
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
Смотрите видео, в котором я показала 3 способа быстро создавать стильные изображения для социальных сетей с помощью искусственного интеллекта. Смотреть тут 👉 https://youtu.be/v5zX3IzruPE
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
Почему у вас нет комментариев в МАКСе (и когда появятся) Вчера клиентка задала мне вопрос А почему в нашем канале в МАКСе нельзя комментировать посты, как в Телеграме? Сразу успокою: ваш канал тут ни при чём, и мы ничего не настроили неправильно. Дело в самой платформе. 26 июня МАКС официально объявил, что запустил тестирование функции комментариев в публичных каналах, и в пилоте участвует чуть больше сотни автор…
👍4😁2❤1
https://t.me/desten_pro_vl
У каждого специалиста есть профдеформация. Моя в том, что я вижу контент во всем окружающем🤭 Сегодня были с Саньком у лора и я подумала как жаль, что в моём агентстве нет детской клиники на продвижении. Ведь такую харизматичную модель для контент-съёмок найти - это задача со звездочкой! И полечились, и подурачились, и подарок от доктора получили. Санёк счастлив. А если нужна модель, вы знаете к кому обращаться😉
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @marketologvl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ты ж маркетолог😎” (@marketologvl), 795 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketologvl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.