Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @marklitvinov blog

Channel

@marklitvinov blog

@marklitvinov_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

783subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788185733
TypeChannel
Username@marklitvinov_blog
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/marklitvinov_blog

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7677837757 August 2026 — 767 subscribers8 August 2026 — 768 subscribers8 August 2026 — 768 subscribers15 August 2026 — 767 subscribers23 August 2026 — 769 subscribers30 August 2026 — 770 subscribers8 September 2026 — 775 subscribers15 September 2026 — 783 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 765–785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 03:37783+8
8 Sept 2026, 08:57775+5
30 Aug 2026, 07:54770+1
23 Aug 2026, 12:08769+2
15 Aug 2026, 20:12767-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:49768no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:35768+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:10767first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

318 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 627833170092989214216451.6%
custom 537075490741238017915448.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marklitvinov_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 October 2025 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,510 views50 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Бронза🥉 Я помню, как начинался мой путь в спорте, когда я был совсем мелким - получил первую бронзовую медаль за 3 место на соревнованиях по Таэквондо. Не сказать, что я особенно готовился именно к соревнованиям, но приложенные усилия привели к результату. За следующие несколько лет я уже завоевал золото на краевых соревнованиях. При этом тренировки были по 3 раза в неделю, а летом мы ездили в спортивный лагерь и тр

custom 627833170092989214228custom 537075490741238017922

29 Mar 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,500 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Разбирал я на прошлой неделе сореву IEEE-CIS Fraud Detection с великими Chris Deotte, Giba, CPMP, Dieter в топе. Хотел посмотреть через такую призму: вот они супер жесткие мужики, все грандмастера кагла. А сколько они сил вложили в эту сореву? Да и вообще - как финальный результат зависел от количества приложенных усилий? Есть ли какая-то взаимосвязь? Как всегда, оговорки: • показывается суммарное количество посылок

custom 627833170092989214211

29 Mar 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,130 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 62783317009298921424

15 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC≈2,380 views24 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Про пищу для ума (Homo est quod est) Пост будет как слоеный пирог, и я попробую вас очень аккуратно провести к самой вишенке на торте. Слои и вишенка в данном случае: Поход к зубному и выбор на вквидео -> Интервью Кримсона от 2022 года для spnsr.ru -> Моя мысль про то что внешние люди и я сам, как LLM-ки, - надо уметь нормально промптить и получать то, что ты хочешь, от других (aka "мы получаем лишь то, о чем можем

custom 627833170092989214217custom 53707549074123801797

15 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,740 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53707549074123801795custom 62783317009298921421

1 Mar 2026, 19:57 UTC≈2,040 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что я рассказываю на встречах, часть 2: месяц работы с openclaw. Когда я в сентябре обсуждал с Славой @decisions_center инстурменты труда для квантов и прогеров, было сложно представить, что они будут прогрессировать настолько быстро. Еще в мае 2025 года я навайбкодил бакалаврский диплом за несколько дней, это было еще в cursor, который я удалил в феврале. Его уверенно заменил claude code, и хоть он круто развивает

custom 537075490741238017926custom 627833170092989214211

15 Feb 2026, 20:54 UTC≈1,960 views34 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Что я рассказываю на встречах, часть 1: качественное понимание. Представь: мы пересеклись на кофе, в бане или просто за обедом. Ты спрашиваешь — ну как, что нового? И я делюсь чем-то из последних инсайтов. Вот один из них. Есть два типа понимания: количественное и качественное. Часто говорят "количество переходит в качество", но мало кто понимает, что это реально значит. Я для себя разобрался так: тот, кто понима

custom 537075490741238017924custom 627833170092989214210

11 Jan 2026, 16:28 UTC≈2,510 views42 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Реальное соревнование Есть у меня давняя гипотеза о том, как на самом деле устроена конкуренция для попадения в top-5%, top-1%. После новогодних праздников было много времени поразмышлять об этом, поэтому и делюсь мыслью. Во многих сферах жизни встречаются одни и те же механизмы, которые работают из раза в раз. И мне уже начинает казаться, что работа, отношения, спорт и здоровье, творчество - всё одно и то же, прос

custom 627833170092989214230custom 537075490741238017912

20 Dec 2025, 19:46 UTC≈2,350 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Первый полумарафон Сегодня с утра проснулся с навязчивым желанием побегать. На прошлой неделе у меня было две силовых на верх и ноги, потому что от предыдущих забегов на 10 и 12 километров на дороже болели стопы. Тут вроде как они уже меня не беспокоили и можно было пробовать. Пришел в в свой ddx я около 7:30, немного разогрелся и встал на дорожку. Поставил себе сразу цель - 21,1 км. Бежал почти 3 часа в комфортном

custom 537075490741238017923custom 62783317009298921425

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @marklitvinov_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Глеб Соломин 🚀 24.05.2025
@gleb_solomin · 59,630
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@marklitvinov blog” (@marklitvinov_blog), 783 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marklitvinov_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.